ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0650

Obinutuzumab Demonstrates Steroid-Sparing Effects and Consistent Benefit In Patients with Lupus Nephritis When Using Multiple Primary Endpoint Definitions: A Secondary Analysis of Phase III Trial Results

Brad Rovin1, Jay Garg2, Richard Furie3, Rachel Jones4, Amit Saxena5, Pasquale Esposito6, Elsa Martins7, Claire Petry7, Nicolas Frey7, Bongin Yoo2, Imran Hassan8, Thomas Schindler7, Theodore Omachi9, William Pendergraft2, Mittermayer Santiago10, Gustavo Aroca Martínez11 and Ana Malvar12, 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 2Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, 4Renal Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom, 5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 6Clinica Nefrologica, Dialisi, Trapianto, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy, 7F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland, 8Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 9Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, 10Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health and UFBA, Federal University of Bahia, and Clínica SER da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 11Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia y Clínica de la Costa, Barranquilla, Colombia, 12Organización Médica de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, glucocorticoids, Lupus nephritis, Randomized Trial, Renal

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0641–0670) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: The Phase III REGENCY study (NCT04221477) demonstrated superiority of obinutuzumab (OBI) over placebo (PBO) in achieving complete renal response (CRR) at Week 76 when added to standard therapy (ST) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus glucocorticoids in patients with active lupus nephritis (LN). Improvement or stabilization of kidney function and improvement of proteinuria are commonly included in the definitions of complete response in recent LN clinical studies, but there is no standardized definition of the CRR endpoint.In these post hoc analyses, we evaluated i) the effect of OBI+ST vs PBO+ST across different renal response definitions used in recent studies, ii) the efficacy of OBI+ST vs PBO+ST on each component included in the REGENCY CRR definition, and iii) the oral prednisone intake over time between the two treatment groups.

Methods: REGENCY, BLISS-LN and AURORA-1 renal response endpoint definitions were used for analysis of the REGENCY dataset at Week 76. Endpoint measure definitions are in Table 1. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test statistic stratified by the IxRS stratification factors, region and race, was used for the two treatment comparisons. All patients met ACR criteria for SLE and had biopsy-proven active LN. As part of ST, all patients received oral prednisone (or equivalent) and followed a standardized tapering schedule to achieve a target dose of 5 mg/day (or equivalent) by study Week 24.

Results: In the OBI+ST (n=135) and PBO+ST groups (n=136), respectively, 46.4% and 33.1% of patients achieved CRR at Week 76 (adjusted difference 13.4%, 95% CI, 2.0 to 24.8%; P=0.0232). The proportions of patients at Week 76 achieving i) a modified BLISS-LN primary efficacy renal response were 51.8% and 39.7% (adjusted difference: 12.1%, 95% CI, 0.5 to 23.8%; P=0.0432); ii) a modified BLISS-LN CRR were 48.7% and 33.1% (adjusted difference: 15.7%, 95% CI, 4.3 to 27.2%; P=0.0084); iii) a modified AURORA-1 CRR were 48.7% and 33.8% (adjusted difference: 15.0%, 95% CI, 3.6 to 26.5%; P=0.0117) (Figure 1).In REGENCY, the proportions of patients achieving the individual components of CRR at Week 76 were numerically higher in the OBI arm compared with the PBO arm for all three components (UPCR < 0.5 g/g: 47.4% vs 36.0%; eGFR ≥85% of baseline: 83.7% vs 75.7%; no occurrence of intercurrent events: 88.9% vs 75.0% for OBI+ST and PBO+ST, respectively). In both arms, the main reasons for not attaining CRR were a UPCR ≥0.5 or an eGFR < 85% of baseline (54.8% OBI+ST vs 65.4% PBO+ST).The mean daily prednisone intake was consistently lower in patients in the OBI arm compared with the PBO arm from Week 24-76, although the 95% CI overlapped at some intermediate visits (Figure 2). The proportions of patients achieving a daily prednisone (or equivalent) dose of ≤5 mg/day were consistently higher in the OBI vs PBO arm from Week 36. This reached a 10-percentage point absolute difference from Week 64-76 (78.5% vs 68.4% for OBI+ST vs PBO+ST, respectively; adjusted difference (95% CI): 10.1% (−0.5 to 20.4), P=0.0589).

Conclusion: In a post hoc analysis of the REGENCY trial outcomes, OBI showed consistent benefit across various patient subgroups, utilizing multiple alternative definitions of CRR, and also exhibited steroid-sparing properties.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: B. Rovin: Alexion, 2, Artiva, 2, 11, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Cabelleta, 2, Century, 2, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc., 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Novartis, 2; J. Garg: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 12, Shareholder, Genentech, Inc., 3; R. Furie: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 12, Investigator, Genentech, Inc., 2, 12, Investigator, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 2, 5, Kyverna Therapeutics, 12, Investigator, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 2; R. Jones: CSL Vifor, 2, 5, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5; A. Saxena: AbbVie, 1, Amgen, 1, AstraZeneca, 1, Aurinia, 1, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, Genentech, 1, GSK, 1, Kezar Life Sciences, 1, Synthekine, 1, UCB, 2, 5; P. Esposito: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, 1, Sanofi, 1; E. Martins: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 3; C. Petry: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 3, 12, Shareholder; N. Frey: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 3; B. Yoo: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 12, Shareholder, Genentech, Inc., 3, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 12, Shareholder; I. Hassan: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, 3; T. Schindler: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 3, 12, Shareholder; T. Omachi: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 12, Shareholder, Genentech, Inc., 3; W. Pendergraft: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 12, Shareholder, Genentech, Inc., 3; M. Santiago: None; G. Aroca Martínez: None; A. Malvar: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Inc., 2, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 2, Kezar, 2, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rovin B, Garg J, Furie R, Jones R, Saxena A, Esposito P, Martins E, Petry C, Frey N, Yoo B, Hassan I, Schindler T, Omachi T, Pendergraft W, Santiago M, Aroca Martínez G, Malvar A. Obinutuzumab Demonstrates Steroid-Sparing Effects and Consistent Benefit In Patients with Lupus Nephritis When Using Multiple Primary Endpoint Definitions: A Secondary Analysis of Phase III Trial Results [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/obinutuzumab-demonstrates-steroid-sparing-effects-and-consistent-benefit-in-patients-with-lupus-nephritis-when-using-multiple-primary-endpoint-definitions-a-secondary-analysis-of-phase-iii-trial-resu/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/obinutuzumab-demonstrates-steroid-sparing-effects-and-consistent-benefit-in-patients-with-lupus-nephritis-when-using-multiple-primary-endpoint-definitions-a-secondary-analysis-of-phase-iii-trial-resu/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology