ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1087

Nonmemory B Cell Signature Alterations in Belimumab Patients

Karina Marianne D. Torralba1, Vaneet Sandhu2, Abigail Benitez1 and Sheila Lezcano3, 1Rheumatology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, 3Rheumatology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: B cell memory, B cell targeting, belimumab and flow cytometry, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: B Cell Biology and Targets in Autoimmune Disease - Poster I: SLE and Sjögren's

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Insight into B cell subset dynamics and homeostasis can provide a biological rationale for use of B cell targeted therapies in SLE patients. Using our B cell signature (BCS) approach we wanted to assess whether treatment with Belimumab would result in a unique BCS that reflects a reduction in B cell subsets that are most sensitive to B cell activating factor (BAFF) depletion. Our BCS used the CD21/CD24 model that delineates analogous mouse and human nonmemory B cell subsets. Mouse studies have used CD21 and CD24 co-expression to identify which subsets are susceptible to BAFF depletion.

Methods: PBMCs were isolated from healthy donors, and SLE patients on Belimumab or standard of care therapy (SCT). Cells were stained for flow cytometry to identify nonmemory and memory subsets. BCS were determined based on the frequency of each B cell subsets within the nonmemory and memory pools and compared across treatment groups. One-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s post-hoc test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Our evaluation of BCS showed that Belimumab (n=13) patients had significantly higher proportions of nonmemory transitional 1 cells (p = 0.0062) compared to SCT (n=24) patients and healthy controls (n=14). Alternately, Belimumab patients had significantly lower proportions of nonmemory transitional 2 subset (p=0.0014) compared to healthy controls. FM (naïve) cells displayed no significant differences between the three groups. When we assessed the ratio of T1 to T2, Belimumab B cells had a larger ratio compared to both healthy and SCT (p=0.0033), but healthy and SCT were not significantly different. We also evaluated total transitional B cells to FM cells and noted no significant differences.

Conclusion: Our results show that B cell subsets must be stringently assessed as indicated by the transitional B cell subset data. BCS from Belimumab patients display unique profiles compared to both SCT and healthy donors. Our future studies will consist of a longitudinal evaluation of BCS in pre-Belimumab treatment and at subsequent time points in order to correlate BCS alterations with specific patient clinical characteristics.


Disclosure: K. M. D. Torralba, GlaxoSmithKline, 9,ACR, USSONAR, 9; V. Sandhu, None; A. Benitez, None; S. Lezcano, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Torralba KMD, Sandhu V, Benitez A, Lezcano S. Nonmemory B Cell Signature Alterations in Belimumab Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/nonmemory-b-cell-signature-alterations-in-belimumab-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/nonmemory-b-cell-signature-alterations-in-belimumab-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology