ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2636

No Strong Evidence Supporting Predictors for Successful Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of a Biologic in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review

L. Tweehuysen1, C.H. van den Ende2, F.M.M. Beeren2, E.M.J. Been2, F.H.J. van den Hoogen3,4 and A.A. den Broeder3, 1Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 4Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologics, Biomarkers, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tapering of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is based on a trial-and-error disease activity guided strategy, because it is not known in advance which patient can successfully taper. Prediction of successful dose reduction or discontinuation of a biologic could prevent flares and save drug exposition. In the last years, several cohort studies have investigated biomarkers for predicting successful tapering. However, these results have not yet been systematically summarized. The objective of our study was to systematically review studies that address prediction of successful dose reduction or discontinuation of a biologic in RA patients.

Methods: A broad literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library (November 2015). Studies that examined the predictive value of biomarkers for successful dose reduction or discontinuation of a biologic in RA patients were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. A biomarker was classified as potential predictor if the univariate association was either strong (odds ratio or hazard ratio > 2.0 or < 0.5) or statistically significant. If these data were not provided, other association measures or textual conclusions were used. Qualitative best-evidence synthesis for biomarkers studied multiple times was performed separately for the prediction of successful dose reduction and discontinuation. Biomarkers that were defined in ≥ 75% of the studies as potential predictor were regarded as ‘Predictor’.

Results: Out of 3029 non-duplicate articles, 16 articles on 15 cohorts were included. In total, 17/52 and 33/64 biomarkers were studied multiple times for the prediction of successful dose reduction and successful discontinuation of a biologic. Three predictors were identified: higher adalimumab trough level for successful dose reduction (Figure 1); and lower Sharp/van der Heijde erosion score and shorter symptom duration at the start of a biologic for successful discontinuation. Noteworthy, those three biomarkers were only studied twice, meaning that more frequently investigated biomarkers yielded no consistent predictors.

Conclusion: The predictive value of a wide variety of biomarkers for successful dose reduction or discontinuation of a biologic in rheumatoid arthritis has been investigated. We identified only three biomarkers as predictor in just two studies. The strength of the evidence is limited by the low quality of included studies and the likelihood of reporting bias and multiple testing. Figure 1  Biomarkers for the prediction of successful dose reduction of a biologic


Disclosure: L. Tweehuysen, None; C. H. van den Ende, None; F. M. M. Beeren, None; E. M. J. Been, None; F. H. J. van den Hoogen, Celltrion, 9,Sandoz, 9,Biogen Idec, 9; A. A. den Broeder, Amgen, 5,ABBVIE, 9,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tweehuysen L, van den Ende CH, Beeren FMM, Been EMJ, van den Hoogen FHJ, den Broeder AA. No Strong Evidence Supporting Predictors for Successful Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of a Biologic in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/no-strong-evidence-supporting-predictors-for-successful-dose-reduction-or-discontinuation-of-a-biologic-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/no-strong-evidence-supporting-predictors-for-successful-dose-reduction-or-discontinuation-of-a-biologic-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-systematic-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology