ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0377

New efforts to incorporate patient-reported outcomes into clinical trials for lupus therapeutics

Patti Katz1, Anca Askanase2, Nandan Baruah3, Wen-Hung Chen4, Nicole Cooper5, Anna Fisch3, Lili Garrard6, Meenakshi Jolly7, Veronica Vargas Lupo8, Carla Menezes9, Judith Mills3, Hoang Nguyen10, Teodora Staeva5, Josephine Park11 and Zahi Touma12, 1UCSF, San Rafael, CA, 2Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 3Lupus Voices Council, Lupus Accelerating Breakthroughs Consortium, New York, 4GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, 5Lupus Research Alliance, New York, 6FDA, CDER, SIlver Spring, MD, 7Rush University, Chicago, 8Lupus Voices Council, Lupus Research Alliance, New York, NY, 9Lupus Therapeutics, New York, NY, 10Lupus Research Alliance, New York, NY, 11EMDSerono, Boston, MA, 12University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Patient reported outcomes, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0357–0386) Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Lupus Accelerating Breakthroughs Consortium (Lupus ABC) was formed by the Lupus Research Alliance as a public private partnership of people living with lupus, investigators, pharmaceutical companies, and the FDA to accelerate lupus drug development in a precompetitive, collaborative setting and ensure that the perspectives of people with lived experience of lupus are incorporated into the drug development process. We report on the first meeting to convene broad representation of lupus community voices to focus on better integration of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in lupus clinical trials.

Methods: A public meeting with representatives from all Lupus ABC stakeholders was held October 16-17, 2024. The current use of PROs in lupus clinical trials was presented and breakout groups discussed 4 primary topics: 1) the important concepts of interest or PRO domains to measure; 2) questionnaire burden, modes of administration, and sharing results; 3) selection of reliable and valid PRO measures for trials; and 4) steps needed to advance the goal of wider PRO incorporation into trials. Results from breakout groups were presented and discussed; these are summarized below.

Results: Pain, fatigue, and cognitive function/brain fog were the most frequently recommended primary domains by participants with lupus and were corroborated with other stakeholders (Table 1). Ideas on questionnaire burden varied, and persons with lupus suggested potential adaptations of how PRO measures are currently administered depending on frequency, mode of administration and context, including a preference for electronic administration. There was strong consensus to return information on PROs and trial results to participants and involve all stakeholders early in the trial design process to identify the appropriate PRO domains and measures. While PROs are collected in most lupus clinical trials, participants felt that they may be underutilized as primary or secondary/exploratory endpoints. A desire to change the focus in trials from disease activity and signs to include PROs to highlight patients’ voices was noted. The need for balance between the mechanisms of action of a product, what is important to patients, and what aspect(s) of disease that could be changed from treatment was also discussed as a critical issue. The potential lack of concordance between standard clinical measures and PROs was felt to be a challenge to the acceptance of PROs as potential endpoints. The group noted specific steps that are needed to incorporate PROs into endpoints for regulatory decision-making: encourage PRO data to be made public and accessible to researchers; come to consensus on domain(s) and best measure(s) of those domains; and involve people living with lupus in selection of PRO domains and measures and trial design (Table 2).

Conclusion: The group, with broad lupus community representation, identified a number of steps needed to incorporate PRO measures into endpoints for regulatory decision-making. For these actions, collaborations among industry, researchers, regulators, payors, and people living with lupus are needed.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: P. Katz: None; A. Askanase: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Aurinia, 2, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Idorsia, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, NKARTA, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 2, 5; N. Baruah: None; W. Chen: AstraZeneca, 3, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 3; N. Cooper: None; A. Fisch: None; L. Garrard: None; M. Jolly: LRA, 1, Rush University, 9, 10; V. Vargas Lupo: None; C. Menezes: None; J. Mills: None; H. Nguyen: None; T. Staeva: None; J. Park: EMD Serono, 3, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 3, Novartis, 3; Z. Touma: AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Merck KgaA, 2, Novartis, 1, Roche, 2, Sarkana Pharma Inc, 2, UCB/Biopharma, 1, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Katz P, Askanase A, Baruah N, Chen W, Cooper N, Fisch A, Garrard L, Jolly M, Vargas Lupo V, Menezes C, Mills J, Nguyen H, Staeva T, Park J, Touma Z. New efforts to incorporate patient-reported outcomes into clinical trials for lupus therapeutics [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/new-efforts-to-incorporate-patient-reported-outcomes-into-clinical-trials-for-lupus-therapeutics/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/new-efforts-to-incorporate-patient-reported-outcomes-into-clinical-trials-for-lupus-therapeutics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology