ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2598

Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Levels Measured By Cell Free Nucleosome ELISA in Serum Are Highly Specific and Sensitive for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Paul Hasler1, Stavros Giaglis1, Ulrich A. Walker2, Erik Deman1, Christoph Hemmeler1, Christina Ryser1, Samuel Kretzschmar1, Guenther Schaefer3, Juliane Franz1 and Sinuhe Hahn4, 1Rheumatology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland, 2Rheumatology, University Hospital, Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 3Dept. of Biomedicine, Laboratory of Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 4Dept. of Biomedicine, Laboratory for Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Diagnostic Tests, Neutrophil Extracellular Traps, nucleosomes and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster Session III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) detection have limited clinical utility for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as the specificity and sensitivity of RF is low and ACPAs seem restricted to a subgroup of RA patients. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, the extracellular extrusion of chromosomal components from the nucleus upon specific stimulation, reported principally as a response to infectious agents, has also been linked to the pathogenesis of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases such as preeclampsia (PE), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and recently RA1,2. We have previously observed that serum samples from RA patients showed significantly higher cell-free DNA levels than those of healthy controls and that the serum concentration of cell free nucleosomes (cfNucs) is a surrogate marker for NET formation3,4.

Our aim was to validate cfNuc measurement in the serum for the diagnosis of RA and to assess its potential to differentiate rheumatoid arthritis cases from similar autoimmune inflammatory conditions and healthy controls.

Methods: Serum from healthy controls and groups of patients with RA, SLE, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were analyzed for cfNuc levels by ELISA. Healthy and disease control groups were compared by one way ANOVA. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated with the standard errors. The results presented are from an interim analysis of a targeted 120 cases with RA and 30 each with SLE, PsA and AS.

Results: The mean cfNuc level of the healthy control group (n=47) was 0.3244, of the RA patients 1.813 (n=64), of the SLE patients 0.5753 (n=18), of the PsA patients 0.4684 (n=6) and of the patients with AS 0.6328 (n=10).

The difference between healthy controls and RA was significant at P<0.0001, between RA and SLE 0.0011, between RA and PsA 0.0007, and between RA and AS 0.0001.

Significance between RA and all disease controls and between RA and all controls was P<0.0001. The ROC area under the curve (AUC) for RA versus healthy controls was > 97%, the sensitivity and specificity being 87.5% and 91.5%, respectively, at a 0.58 cutoff. The ROC AUC for distinguishing RA from SLE was 88%, from PsA 92%, from AS 86% and disease controls as a group 88% (sensitivity 81.25%, specificity 80-89% at a cutoff of 0.78). For RA versus all controls, the ROC AUC was 93% (sensitivity 81.25%, specificity 93% at a cutoff of 0.78).

Conclusion: The detection of cell free nucleosomes in the serum of patients with autoimmune conditions can be utilized to discriminate between healthy controls and cases with RA with remarkable sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity and specificity against disease controls, albeit less, were in a similar range. Upon reaching our target case numbers, we intend to analyze whether cfNuc could provide a tool to monitor and/or predict the response of RA patients to treatment with biologics and to optimize the ELISA assay.

References 1. Mantovani, A et al. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;25;11:519-31; 2. Dwivedi N et al. Arthritis Rheuma. 2012;64:982-92; 3. Sur Chowdhury C et al. Arthr Res Ther 2014;16:R122


Disclosure: P. Hasler, Patent application, 9; S. Giaglis, Patent application, 9; U. A. Walker, None; E. Deman, None; C. Hemmeler, None; C. Ryser, None; S. Kretzschmar, None; G. Schaefer, None; J. Franz, None; S. Hahn, Patent application, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hasler P, Giaglis S, Walker UA, Deman E, Hemmeler C, Ryser C, Kretzschmar S, Schaefer G, Franz J, Hahn S. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Levels Measured By Cell Free Nucleosome ELISA in Serum Are Highly Specific and Sensitive for Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neutrophil-extracellular-trap-levels-measured-by-cell-free-nucleosome-elisa-in-serum-are-highly-specific-and-sensitive-for-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neutrophil-extracellular-trap-levels-measured-by-cell-free-nucleosome-elisa-in-serum-are-highly-specific-and-sensitive-for-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology