ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 930

Neurostimulation for Treatment of Drug Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis: A First-in-Human Study Using a Novel Vagus Nerve Stimulator

Norman Gaylis1, David Sikes 2, Alan Kivitz 3, Diane Horowitz 4, Charles Peterfy 5, Yaakov Levine 6, David Chernoff 6 and Mark Genovese 7, 1Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease Specialties, Aventura, FL, 2Florida Medical Clinic, Land O Lakes, FL, 3Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 4Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 5Spire Sciences Inc, Boca Raton, 6SetPoint Medical, Valencia, CA, 7Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: clinical trials, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pilot study, non-pharmacologic intervention, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: 3S109: RA – Treatments II: Novel Treatments for RA (927–932)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: The inflammatory reflex is an endogenous neuroimmune circuit that helps regulate innate and adaptive immunity (Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012; 30:313). Activation of this reflex by electrical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) reduced systemic inflammation and disease activity in a 17 patient rheumatoid arthritis (RA) proof-of-concept study using a reprogrammed epilepsy stimulator (PNAS 2016; 113(29):8284). Here we report on the safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized neurostimulator, the “MicroRegulator” (MR), in a first-in-human, double-blind pilot study of VNS in multi-drug refractory RA patients. 

Methods: The MR was implanted on the left vagus nerve in 14 patients with active RA and prior insufficient response to ≥2 bDMARDS or JAK inhibitors with ≥2 different modes of action; all patients remained on a stable background of MTX (n=12) or HCQ. Three weeks after implantation, the first 3 subjects were stimulated 1 min QD and, following safety review board approval, the remaining 11 patients were implanted with the MR and randomized to 1 min: sham, QD, or QID VNS for 12 weeks (primary endpoint; PE). Patients, rheumatologists, joint assessors and monitors were fully blinded to treatment arm. Patients randomized to sham had their devices activated after the PE was reached. The pharmacodynamic response to VNS was assessed in blood using cytokine production in an ex-vivo bioassay (TruCulture). Clinical efficacy was measured by DAS28-CRP and CDAI responses and by wrist MRI (RAMRIS OMERACT).  Vagus nerve activity (tone) was extracted from heart rate variability assessments of Holter-captured ECG.

Results: 14 patients were enrolled (mean prior bDMARDs = 4.8, mean DAS28-CRP= 5.94). Implantation and stimulation were generally well tolerated. There were no device or treatment-related SAEs and 2 notable surgery related adverse events (left vocal cord paralysis, Horner’s syndrome) that resolved without clinically significant sequelae. Confirming activation of the inflammatory reflex, the pharmacodynamic response of VNS was observed in both actively stimulated groups with >30% decrease from baseline in bioassay levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α at PE, with minimal change in the sham group. Mean DAS28-CRP change at PE was: combined QD= -1.34, QID= 0.38, Sham= 0.16. Of QD stimulated patients, 4/6 had a EULAR good or moderate response vs. 1/4 QID and 0/4 shams. Both DAS28 and CDAI response was achieved by 5/10 actively stimulated patients at PE, with 2 in DAS28 remission. MRI inflammation measures did not change by PE. RAMRIS erosion scores correlated with EULAR response (change in responders = -2.2 vs. 2.4 in non-responders). Mean vagal tone in the stimulated patients was increased 2.75-fold relative to sham stimulated patients.

Conclusion:

The novel MR device and stimulation was well tolerated independent of the two surgery-related events. MR associated VNS reduced signs and symptoms of RA in a meaningful number of highly drug-refractory patients. No clinical improvement was observed in the sham group. These initial pilot data support the use of the MR for QD VNS in a larger blinded sham-controlled study in patients who have failed biologics or targeted oral therapies as a novel approach for treatment of RA.


Disclosure: N. Gaylis, SetPoint Medical, 2, BMS, 2, AbbVie, 2, GSK, 2, Janssen, 2, Amgen, 2, Pfizer, 2, Regeneron, 2, UCB, 2, Sanofi, 2, ImmunPharma, 2, Astra Zeneca, 2, Sandoz, 2, Novartis, 2, Gilead, 2, electroCore, 5; D. Sikes, SetPoint Medical, 2, Pfizer, 2, Actelion, 2, Abbvie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Myriad, 5; A. Kivitz, AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 1, 4, 5, Boehringer Ingeleheim, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 8, Flexion, 5, 8, Flexion Therapeutics, 8, Genzyme, 5, 8, Gilead, 1, 4, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 4, Horizon, 8, Janssen, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Merck, 8, Novartis, 1, 4, 8, Pfizer, 1, 4, 5, 8, Regeneron, 1, 5, 8, Sanofi, 1, 4, 5, 8, Sun Pharma, 5, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, 5, UCB, 5; D. Horowitz, SetPoint Medical, 2; C. Peterfy, AbbVie, 5, Acerta, 5, Amgen, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Centrexion, 5, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Daiichi Sankyo, 5, Daiichi Sankyu, 5, EMD Serono, 5, Five Prime, 5, Five Prime Therapeutics, 5, Flexion Therapeutics, 5, Genentech, 5, Genescence, 5, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Hoffmann-La Roche, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, MedImmune, 5, Merck, 5, Modern Bioscience, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Plexikkon, 5, Plexxikon, 5, Regeneron, 5, Roche, Salix-Santarus, 5, Samsung, 5, Sanofi, 5, SetPoint, 5, Sorrento, 5, Spire Sciences, Inc., 1, 3, 4; Y. Levine, SetPoint Medical, 3, 4; D. Chernoff, SetPoint Medical, 3, 4, Crescendo BioScience, 5; M. Genovese, AbbVie, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, 5, AbbVie, Inc., 9, Astellas, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, EMD Merck Serono, 2, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Galapagos NV, 2, 5, 9, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, Gilead Science, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2, 5, 9, GSK, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 9, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Pfizer, Inc., 9, Pzier, 9, RPharm, 5, Sanofi Genzyme, 2, 5, Vertex, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gaylis N, Sikes D, Kivitz A, Horowitz D, Peterfy C, Levine Y, Chernoff D, Genovese M. Neurostimulation for Treatment of Drug Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis: A First-in-Human Study Using a Novel Vagus Nerve Stimulator [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neurostimulation-for-treatment-of-drug-refractory-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-first-in-human-study-using-a-novel-vagus-nerve-stimulator/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/neurostimulation-for-treatment-of-drug-refractory-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-first-in-human-study-using-a-novel-vagus-nerve-stimulator/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology