ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1481

Negative Effect Of Glucocorticoids Persistence Therapy On Porosity In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With TNFα Blockers

Hubert Marotte1, Sara Djemouai2, Béatrice Pallot-Prades2, Hervé Locrelle3 and Thierry Thomas4, 1LBTO INSERM U1059 University Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France, 2University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France, 3INSERM U1059 and University Hospital, Hôpital Nord, Saint-Etienne, France, 4INSERM U1059 and University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, Bone, glucocorticoids and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common joint inflammatory disease associated with an increased risk of bone fractures. The standard of therapeutic strategy is to achieve remission of the disease, which may require a combination of treatment including anti-TNFa therapy and long-term glucocorticoids (GC). While the former has already shown a beneficial effect on bone loss in RA patients, use of GC has two paradoxical effects: it can effectively reduce arthritis and inflammation-induced bone loss while it can also impair bone remodelling balance which results in bone loss. Moreover, GC-induced bone fragility may occur rapidly suggesting deleterious effects on the cortical envelope together with reduced trabecular bone volume. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of GC persistence in RA patients with TNFa blockers on cortical porosity.

Methods:

In this pilot study, we selected a group of RA patients in the mid-age range, excluding those below 18 and above 65 years old, with neither concomitant bone disease nor endocrinopathy, to avoid any alteration of bone status unrelated to RA. We enrolled 6 RA patients requiring anti-TNFa therapy because of a methotrexate non-responding disease.

Porosity was assessed by High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computerized Tomography (HRpQCT) on radius at the diaphysis site before, 6 and 12 months after introducing anti-TNFa therapy. At the same time, bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed at the radial distal site.

Results:

These 8 RA patients (4 men and 4 women) shared the usual characteristic of RA patients with a median age of 49.5 years (range: 35.8-62.4), median disease duration of 3 years (1-11), and a median DAS28 of 4.8 (3.9-6.1) with elevated biological inflammation (ESR: 25 mm/hr (9-68) and CRP at 27.1 mg/L (3-68). Rheumatoid factor and ACPA were present in 71%. Four of the 8 RA patients received GC therapy at the inclusion.

While BMD remained stable under treatment, we observed an increasing of cortical porosity between baseline and 12 month (P<0.05). Doses of GC therapy during the 6 last months correlated with the increasing of porosity in the same time (P=0.042; R=0.653), whereas we observe no correlation during the 6 first months (P=0.34; R=0.122). 

Conclusion:

Despite the small sample size of this pilot study, the strong difference between the 2 periods infers that the anti-inflammatory effects of GC participate to the beneficial effects of therapy on bone while persistence of GC on the long term contribute to bone damage with increasing cortical porosity.


Disclosure:

H. Marotte,
None;

S. Djemouai,
None;

B. Pallot-Prades,
None;

H. Locrelle,
None;

T. Thomas,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/negative-effect-of-glucocorticoids-persistence-therapy-on-porosity-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-treated-with-tnf%ce%b1-blockers/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology