ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1819

Myocarditis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Alexandra Perel-Winkler1, Sabahat Bokhari2, Anca D. Askanase3 and Laura Geraldino-Pardilla4, 1Rheumatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 2Cardiology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, NY, NY, 3Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 4Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, new york, NY

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: imaging techniques, Lupus, myocardial involvement and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster II: Damage Accrual and Quality of Life

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose : Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death in patients with SLE. Lupus patients have a 2-3 fold increased risk of heart failure compared to age matched controls. Although the mechanisms remain unclear, lupus myocarditis (LM) has been proposed as a contributor. 18F-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging has emerged as a novel modality to visualize myocardial inflammation in rheumatic diseases. The current study discusses our experience with FDG-PET/CT scanning in LM.

Methods: A total of eight SLE patients diagnosed with LM by FDG-PET/CT are described in this series. Demographics, SLE-specific characteristics, and CVD risk factors were ascertained. Coronary artery disease was evaluated by the Agatston coronary calcium score and/or coronary catheterization.

Results: Eight SLE patients (mean age 43±12 years) seen at the Lupus Center for complaints of chest pain 4 (50%), intermittent shortness of breath 2 (25%) or palpitations 2 (25%) followed from November 2015 to February 2016, underwent cardiac FDG-PET/CT for evaluation of LM. Six patients were female, 4/8 were Hispanic and 4/8 were non-Hispanic Black. The median SLEDAI-2K and SLICC SDI scores were 5 (2-11) and 1.5 (0-2), respectively. Mean SLE disease duration prior to the diagnosis of LM was 11±6 years. One patient had hypertension and diabetes, and 3 patients were former or current smokers. Of the 8 patients, 1 had a history of pericarditis and 5 had prior severe lupus activity and organ involvement: 4 had lupus nephritis and 1 had CNS lupus. All patients were ANA positive, 7 ds-DNA+ and 5 were anti-SSA antibody positive. None of the patients had anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome or APL antibodies. One patient had elevated troponins and elevated pro-BNP. Electrocardiographic abnormalities were noted in all patients with 5 having non-specific ST-T changes and sinus tachycardia. Interestingly, only 5 patients had echocardiographic abnormalities: pericardial effusion in 3 (38%), global hypokinesis in 2 (25%) and valvular abnormalities 2 (25%). The mean ejection fraction was 41±16% (Table 1). On cardiac FDG-PET/CT imaging, all patients had diffuse myocardial uptake (Figure 1).

Conclusion: These data propose that cardiac FDG-PET/CT imaging has higher sensitivity than 2-D echocardiography in detecting myocardial inflammation in SLE and support the use of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of myocarditis in SLE. Table 1. Diagnostic Findings of SLE patients with FDG-PET/CT diagnosed myocarditis (n=8).

Laboratory Data
     C3, mean (±SD) 84.5 ± 26.5
     C4,  mean (±SD) 16.8 ± 11.1
     Ds-DNA Antibody titer, mean (±SD) 113.4 ±99.7
     ESR, mean (±SD) 45.4 ± 26.6
     CRP, mean (±SD) 5.5 ± 28.9
     Elevated Troponin, n (%) 1 (12%)
     Elevated Pro-BNP, n (%) 1 (12%)
EKG abnormalities
     Non-specific ST-T-wave abnormalities, n(%) 5 (63%)
     Sinus Tachycardia, n(%) 5 (63%)
     Right Bundle Branch Block, n(%) 2 (25%)
     Left Atrial Dilatation, n(%) 1 (12%)
     No abnormalities n (%) 0 (0%)
Transthoracic Echocardiogram
  Ejection Fraction (EF) , mean % (±SD) 41(16.3)
     Abnormal EF, n (%) 4 (50%)
  Other Echocardiographic Abnormalities
     Global hypokinesis, n(%) 2 (25%)
     Pericardial effusion, n(%) 3 (38%)
     Wall Motion abnormalities, n (%) 1 (12%)
     Valvular abnormalities, n(%) 2 (25%)
     Left atrial dilatation, n(%) 1 (12%)
     Left Ventricular Dilatation, n(%) 1 (12%)
     No abnormalities, n(%) 3 (38%)
Abnormal Coronary Angiogram (n=4) 1 (12%)
Coronary Calcium Score >0 (n=4) 1 (12%)
18F-FDG-PET/CT
     Diffuse myocardial uptake, n(%) 8 (100%)
     Focal on diffuse myocardial uptake, n(%) 1 (12%)

  Figure 1. Transverse and Coronal views of 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging of Lupus Myocarditis showing septal, lateral and inferior uptake.


Disclosure: A. Perel-Winkler, None; S. Bokhari, None; A. D. Askanase, None; L. Geraldino-Pardilla, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Perel-Winkler A, Bokhari S, Askanase AD, Geraldino-Pardilla L. Myocarditis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/myocarditis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/myocarditis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology