ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 354

Multidomain Functional Assessment in a Cohort of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Pilot Study

Laura Plantinga1, Benjamin Tift2, C. Barrett Bowling3, Charmayne M. Dunlop-Thomas4, S. Sam Lim5 and Cristina Drenkard5, 1Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 2Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Spartanburg, SC, 3Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, 4Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 5Division of Rheumatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: functional status, geriatrics and patient-reported outcome measures, Lupus

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, complex disease with multiple comorbid conditions and non-disease-specific manifestations. Consequently, the impact of SLE on both physical and cognitive function may be analogous to what is seen in the general geriatric population. We used a multidomain functional assessment, commonly performed in geriatric patients but novel among SLE patients, to better understand the magnitude of the functional impairment in this population.

Methods:  We recruited 60 adult (≥20 years old) SLE patients from an ongoing cohort study of Atlanta-area SLE patients for an in-person visit (10/16-4/17), in which we evaluated physical and cognitive function in several domains shown to be associated with poor outcomes in geriatric populations: physical performance (by the Short Physical Performance Battery; range on balance, gait speed, and lower body strength scores, 0-4; higher scores = better performance); cognitive performance (by NIH Toolbox measures of five fluid cognition domains; reported as adjusted t-scores); and self-reported measures including physical functioning (reported as t-scores), activities of daily living (ADLs), falls, and life-space mobility, which measures how far, how often, and how much help is needed as respondents move through their community (scale 0-120; higher scores = greater community mobility).

Results:  Balance and gait speed scores were high, while mean lower body strength scores were low (Table). Cognitive performance was close to average (score=50) in the domains of episodic and working memory, but mean scores for cognitive flexibility, processing speed, and attention/inhibitory control were ~1 SD below average for healthy individuals of the same age, sex, race, ethnicity, and education level. Patients reported independence in most basic ADLs but dependence in several instrumental ADLs. Nearly half (45.0%) of patients reported falling in the prior year, and only 40.0% reported unlimited ability to travel without the help of another person. Overall, scores did not differ substantially by age, although older patients had slightly lower self-reported physical functioning and higher cognitive performance scores than younger patients in general.


Conclusion:  SLE patients of all ages report a substantial burden of functional impairment across multiple domains, similar to that among geriatric patients. Because impairment seems to be relatively independent of age in SLE and because greater levels of function may lead to better clinical and patient-centered outcomes, such as the ability to live independently, the value of functional assessment in the setting of SLE should be further explored. Further research could help inform potential interventions to improve or prevent further declines in functioning in this population.

 


Disclosure: L. Plantinga, None; B. Tift, None; C. B. Bowling, None; C. M. Dunlop-Thomas, None; S. S. Lim, None; C. Drenkard, No commercial interest, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Plantinga L, Tift B, Bowling CB, Dunlop-Thomas CM, Lim SS, Drenkard C. Multidomain Functional Assessment in a Cohort of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Pilot Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/multidomain-functional-assessment-in-a-cohort-of-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-pilot-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/multidomain-functional-assessment-in-a-cohort-of-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-a-pilot-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology