ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2185

MRI-detected Abnormalities in Prediction Models of Incident Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis over 10 Years of Follow-up

C. Kent Kwoh1, Frank Roemer 2, Erin Ashbeck 3, ChengCheng Hu 1, Edward Bedrick 1, Leena Sharma 4 and Ali Guermazi 5, 1University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 2University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany, 3The University of Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tuccson, AZ, Tucson, AL, 4Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 5Boston Medical Center, Boston

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Knee and epidemiology, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Osteoarthritis, radiography

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) is a semi-quantitative scoring system used to assess MRI-detected structural abnormalities including over 100 raw scores representing multiple joint tissues, different ordinal grades and joint subregions or locations. Our objective was to compare 8 different representations of MOAKS in terms of prediction performance for time to incident radiographic OA over 10 years of follow-up.

Methods: We randomly selected 859 OAI participants with at least one knee at risk of developing ROA (i.e., KL 0,1 at baseline). 3T knee MRIs were assessed by expert readers using MOAKS. Radiographs were centrally read for KL grade, with ROA defined as KL³2. The 8 representations of MOAKS included features summarized at the whole knee level, the tibiofemoral and patellafemoral (PF) level, and the medial, lateral, subspinous, and PF level, with either maximum scores or sums for ordinal scores of the same feature/type (e.g., maximum number of BML lesions in a subregion (maxBMLLes]); additionally, raw scores as linear predictors and raw scores with indicators for each category were also included.

For each MOAKS representation, we fit lasso penalized Cox models and selected the penalty parameter that achieved a partial log-likelihood deviance within one standard error of the minimum in 10-fold cross validation. Performance of the optimal regularized model was then evaluated with a .632+ bootstrap estimate of the time-dependent Brier score, a weighted mean squared error for predicted survival probability and observed survival status, as well as area under the time-dependent ROC curve.

Results: A total of 244 knees developed incident ROA over the 10 year follow-up. Prediction error based on the area under the estimated prediction error curve was similar for the 8 representations of MOAKS. Variables selected under 6 of 8 representations of MOAKS are shown in Table 1. Performance and model interpretation for the whole knee maximum score model are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Prediction error increased over the course of follow-up (Figure 1a), with the greatest area under the time-dependent ROC curve achieved at 1 and 2 year follow-up (Figure 1b). The nomogram shows the MOAKS variables selected in the model, with the point values for each score, and the correspondence between the total points from these features out of a maximum of 350 points and the 2 year probability of survival from ROA (Figure 2a). For example, a total of 260 points from the 7 variables in the whole knee maximum score model corresponds to a .7 probability of not having ROA 2 years later. Estimated probability of ROA over 10 years is shown for knees with risk scores above and below the median total risk score (Figure 2b).

Conclusion: Different representations of MOAKS, whether maintaining granular-level information or summarizing at the whole knee level with maximum scores or sums of scores, have similar prediction performance for incident ROA. MRI-detected abnormalities provide the greatest discrimination between knees that do and do not develop ROA in the short term (1-2 years), while providing the greatest improvement in prediction over long-term follow-up.


Inc ROA Table 1 rev 3

Table 1 Selected Feature Scores for 6 of 8 representations of MOAKS

1a Prediction error for whole knee maximum scores model
The blue line is the estimated prediction error curve over 10 years based on the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate, without incorporating any MOAKS data
The black line is the .632+ bootstrap estimate of prediction error based on the Cox model with MOAKS predictors
The red line is the apparent estimate of prediction error -in the full sample- based on the Cox model with MOAKS predictors
1b Area under time-dependent ROC curve for whole knee maximum scores model with bootstrapped 95% confidence bands

2a Nomogram for whole knee maximum scores model
2b Predicted Probability of ROA for low risk and high risk knees based on the whole knee maximum scores model; knees with risk scores below the median are “low risk”, while knees with risk scores above the median are “high risk”.


Disclosure: C. Kwoh, Express Scripts, 5, GSK, 5, Kolon Tissue Gene, 5, MerckSerono, 5, Regeneron, 5, Regulus, 5, Taiwan Liposome Company, 5, Thusane, 5; F. Roemer, BICL, 1, Boston Imaging Core Lab, 1, 6, Shareholder BICL,LLC, 1; E. Ashbeck, EMD Serono, 5, MerckSerono, 5; C. Hu, None; E. Bedrick, None; L. Sharma, None; A. Guermazi, AstraZeneca, 5, BICL, 1, Boston Imaging Core Lab (BICL), 1, Galapagos, 5, MerckSerono, 5, Pfizer, 5, Roche, 5, Shareholder BICL,LLC, 1, TissueGene, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kwoh C, Roemer F, Ashbeck E, Hu C, Bedrick E, Sharma L, Guermazi A. MRI-detected Abnormalities in Prediction Models of Incident Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis over 10 Years of Follow-up [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mri-detected-abnormalities-in-prediction-models-of-incident-radiographic-knee-osteoarthritis-over-10-years-of-follow-up/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mri-detected-abnormalities-in-prediction-models-of-incident-radiographic-knee-osteoarthritis-over-10-years-of-follow-up/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology