ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2601

Modified Rodnan Ultrasound Skin Score:  An Ultrasound Skin Scoring Approach In Systemic Sclerosis

Ingeborg Sacksen1, P. Scott Pollock2 and Mark H. Wener3, 1Rheumatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 3Rheumatology & Lab Med, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multi-organ disease characterized by thickening, hardening and tightening of the skin. Skin thickening is described by physical exam and measured semi-quantitatively as the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Ultrasound (US) has been investigated to measure skin thickening, however, approaches to convert and relate US findings to mRSS’s have not been adopted, in part because of the variability of normal skin thickness at different sites (as well as by age and gender).  We present preliminary data reproducing a 17-point mRSS in scleroderma patients and controls by using mid frequency ultrasound (15mHz) and correlating it to physical exam findings.  We propose development of an ultrasound adaptation of the mRSS: the Modified Rodnan Ultrasound Skin Score (mRUSS), which is easy to use, quantifiable, and allows ultrasound-based categorization of the skin in scleroderma patients.

Methods:   We examined the skin of 16 patients (8 women) with diffuse cutaneous SSc and 10 healthy controls using a Sonosite M-Turbo 15mHz ultrasound machine operated by a single examiner. Each patient underwent a 17-point mRSS physical exam, and 12 patients had a second mRSS performed by an experienced rheumatologist.  All patients then underwent a 17-point, comprehensive ultrasound skin exam at reproducible, predefined sites corresponding to the anatomic sites examined in the mRSS.  The sites were: single sites on the face, chest wall, and abdomen, and bilateral 3rd finger, dorsum of the hand, extensor forearm, upper arm, thighs, lower legs, and the dorsal surface of the feet.  Two dermal thickness measurements were taken from each image and averaged.  The mean and standard deviation (SD) was calculated for controls at each site, and the z-score for each site calculated as [(skin thickness)-(mean control thickness at that site)]/(SD of control at that site)]. 

Results: Various cut-points were tested for translating the z-score to mRUSS’s assigned to each anatomic site, and the best concordance between the overall mRSS and the overall mRUSS were obtained with the following criteria: z-score <1= mRUSS 0; z-score 1-3=mRUSS 1; z-score 3-5 =mRUSS 2; z-score >5 =mRUSS 3.  Total mRUSS’s were then correlated to the mRSS (physical exam). The correlation between observer 1 mRSS compared to US score (assuming this to be the gold standard) was .90 and .73 for observer 2 (less experienced provider) (see figure 1).  The r-value comparing observer 1 to observer 2 was 0.97.

Conclusion:   Use of mid frequency US (15-mhz) is a readily available, reproducible, objective method for evaluating skin thickness in scleroderma.  The newly proposed mRUSS scoring system correlates well with the mRSS based on physical exam findings.  These findings will require verification with more patients and by independent examiners, but they have promise for use of precise ultrasound measurements to generate a mRSS equivalent. 


Disclosure:

I. Sacksen,
None;

P. S. Pollock,
None;

M. H. Wener,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/modified-rodnan-ultrasound-skin-score-an-ultrasound-skin-scoring-approach-in-systemic-sclerosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology