ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1017

Minimal Important Difference (MID), Minimal Detectable Change (MDC), and Disease Activity Thresholds for Two Novel Composite Instruments (3VAS, 4VAS) in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies

William Tillett1, Laura Coates2, Marijn Vis3, Joseph Merola4, Enrique R Soriano5, Michelle Perate6, May Shawi7, Miriam Zimmermann8, Emmanouil Rampakakis9, Mohamed Sharaf10, Peter Nash11 and Philip Helliwell12, 1Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, United Kingdom, 2Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, Oxford, England, United Kingdom, 3Erasmus MC Universitair Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 4Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 5Rheumatology Unit and University Institute, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 6Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, 7Immunology Global Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, 8Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Zug, Switzerland, 9McGill University, Department of Pediatrics and JSS Medical Research, Montréal, QC, Canada, 10Johnson & Johnson, Middle East FZ LLC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 11School of Medicine, Griffith University, Sunshine Coast, Australia, 12Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Outcome measures, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Though continuous composite measures of disease activity for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) assessment exist, abbreviated measures that are more feasible for screening in routine clinical practice are needed. The 3 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and 4 VAS scores were developed by abridging the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) Composite Exercise (GRACE) measure to be the first short multidimensional composite measures specifically for use in PsA routine clinical care. The measures were shown to have superior performance than several established composite measures using small datasets,1. GRAPPA members recommended further testing of 3VAS/4VAS in observational and trial datasets.

Methods: This post-hoc analysis of the DISCOVER 1/2 and COSMOS studies2-4 used pooled data through week (W) 24 from all treatment groups across studies. The correlation of 3VAS/4VAS with DAPSA, PASDAS, physician global assessment (PhGA), and patient GA (PtGA) was assessed with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Minimal Important Difference (MID) was assessed with 4 distribution-based methods (based on standard error of the measurement, effect size, reliable change index [RCI], and RCIdiff). Minimal detectable change (MDC) was assessed with the standard formula (Table 2). Clinically relevant thresholds for low, moderate and high disease activity were estimated with receiver operating characteristic analysis and DAPSA (≤4, >4-≤14, >14-≤28, >28), PASDAS (≤1.9, >1.9-≤3.2, >3.2-< 5.4, ≥5.4), and PhGA/PtGA (≤1, >1-≤3, >3-≤6, >6 cm) as anchors.

Results: 1,405 pts were included, of whom 51.3% were male, with a mean (SD) age of 47.1 (11.8), and PsA duration of 6.4 (6.5) years. At BL, the mean (SD) 3VAS, 4VAS, DAPSA, PASDAS, PhGA, and PtGA scores of 6.4 (1.6), 6.3 (1.6), 45.8 (20.2), 6.5 (1.1), 6.5 (1.6), and 6.7 (2.0), respectively, reflected high levels of disease activity. Through W24, both 3VAS and 4VAS showed very strong correlation with PtGA (r3VAS=0.92, r4VAS=0.94) and PASDAS (r3VAS=0.81, r4VAS=0.82), strong with PhGA (r3VAS=0.77, r4VAS=0.74), and moderate to strong with DAPSA (r3VAS=0.59, r4VAS=0.61). Calculated MIDs were 0.9 (range: 0.7-1.3 across methodologies) for 3VAS and 0.9 (range: 0.6-1.3) for 4VAS (Table 1). MDC estimates were 3.3 (range 2.1-4.2 across follow-up intervals) for 3VAS and 3.2 (range: 2-4) for 4VAS (Table 2). Cut-off values for low, moderate and high disease activity were 2.0, 3.4, and 4.9 for 3VAS and 2.1, 3.5 and 5.1 for 4VAS (Figure).

Conclusion: Using a large pooled clinical trial dataset of pts with active PsA, we have calculated clinically relevant thresholds for improvement, as well as disease activity thresholds, for 3VAS and 4VAS. These estimates are generally comparable to those previously reported5 and can be used to set treatment targets as well as screen disease activity in routine care when resources are limited or during remote pt monitoring.

References

  • Tillett W et al. J Rheum. 2021 Mar 1;jrheum.201675
  • Deodhar A et al. Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1115
  • Mease PJ et al. Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1126
  • Coates LC et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81(3):359
  • Tillett W et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:135
  • Supporting image 1

    Table 1. Minimally Important Difference (MID) for 3VAS, 4VAS, DAPSA, PASDAS, PhGA, and PtGA

    Supporting image 2

    Table 2. Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) for 3VAS, 4VAS, DAPSA, PASDAS, PhGA, and PtGA

    Supporting image 3

    Table 3. Disease Activity Thresholds for 3VAS & 4VAS


    Disclosures: W. Tillett, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB; L. Coates, AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Celgene, Biogen, Moonlake, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK); M. Vis, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, the Dutch Arthritis Foundation; J. Merola, AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, Arena, Avotres, EMD, LEO Pharma, Merck, Regeneron, Sanofi; E. Soriano, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Roche; M. Perate, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson; M. Shawi, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson; M. Zimmermann, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Johnson & Johnson; E. Rampakakis, Janssen, JSS Medical Research; M. Sharaf, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson and Johnson; P. Nash, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Celgene; P. Helliwell, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis.

    To cite this abstract in AMA style:

    Tillett W, Coates L, Vis M, Merola J, Soriano E, Perate M, Shawi M, Zimmermann M, Rampakakis E, Sharaf M, Nash P, Helliwell P. Minimal Important Difference (MID), Minimal Detectable Change (MDC), and Disease Activity Thresholds for Two Novel Composite Instruments (3VAS, 4VAS) in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/minimal-important-difference-mid-minimal-detectable-change-mdc-and-disease-activity-thresholds-for-two-novel-composite-instruments-3vas-4vas-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-pooled-analy/. Accessed .
    • Tweet
    • Email
    • Print

    « Back to ACR Convergence 2022

    ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/minimal-important-difference-mid-minimal-detectable-change-mdc-and-disease-activity-thresholds-for-two-novel-composite-instruments-3vas-4vas-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-pooled-analy/

    Advanced Search

    Your Favorites

    You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

    All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

    Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

    Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

    Wiley

    • Online Journal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Permissions Policies
    • Cookie Preferences

    © Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology