ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1765

Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Generic Patient Reported Outcomes Tools in SLE

Hervé Devilliers1, Narender Annapureddy2 and Meenakshi Jolly3, 1Department of Internal Medicine and Systemic Diseases, Hôpital François Mitterrand, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France, 2Rheumatology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 3Department of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: belimumab and outcomes, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster II: Damage Accrual and Quality of Life

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have significant impairment in quality of life (QOL). Health related QOL (HRQOL) is one of the four established core outcomes in SLE.  Generic PRO instruments such as Short Form 36(SF-36), SF-6D, EuroQOL (EQ-5D) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-Fatigue)) have been shown to be valid and reliable in SLE. The purpose of this study is to determine minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of SF-36 and FACIT-fatigue against varied physician assessed DA indices, using data sharing resource from Glaxo-Smith-Kline (GSK), collected during Belimumab clinical trial – BLISS 52.

Methods: Longitudinal data from BLISS 52 clinical trial from 867 SLE patients was acquired from GSK for purpose of these analyses. DA measures (SLEDAI, BILAG) were used as anchors. MCID estimates were obtained against all possible predefined DA and composite DA endpoints used in SLE clinical trials. Mixed model analysis was utilized for the first 4 visits, one month apart for these analyses for individual DA anchors. For SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) and composite measures, 6,069 observation data from 7 visits were used.

Results: 867 SLE patient data consisting of 95% women, with mean (SD) age 35.5 (11.1) yrs., were available. Nearly 65% were Asian or White ethnicity. Median (IQR) SLEDAI, BILAG were 10.0 (4.0) and 17 (11.0) respectively. Median (IQR) MCS, PCS, FACIT-Fatigue were 40.3 (14.3), 41.7 (12.9) and 34.0 (14.0) respectively. MCID against SLEDAI and SRI are shown in table 1 and table 2 respectively. Results for MCID against BILAG are not included in the table but will be available for presentation. SF36 domains and FACIT-fatigue were responsive to improvement in DA endpoints – SELENA-SLEDAI, SFI, BILAG and composite measures. SF36 domains and FACIT-Fatigue were not consistently responsive to worsening in DA.

Conclusion: Our study provides SLE specific MCIDs against commonly used DA measures and further reinforce the need for use of disease specific MCID over “generic” values of improvement/worsening by 2.5 and 5.0 in domain and composite scores of SF36. 


Disclosure: H. Devilliers, None; N. Annapureddy, None; M. Jolly, Pfizer Inc, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Devilliers H, Annapureddy N, Jolly M. Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Generic Patient Reported Outcomes Tools in SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/minimal-clinically-important-differences-for-generic-patient-reported-outcomes-tools-in-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/minimal-clinically-important-differences-for-generic-patient-reported-outcomes-tools-in-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology