ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0733

Median Patient Global Assessment Varies Far More According to FAST4 (fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tool) and MDS2 (MDHAQ Depression Screen) on a Single MDHAQ (multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire) Than According to Primary Diagnosis

Theodore Pincus1, Kathryn Gibson2, Juan Schmukler1, Tengfei Li3 and Joel Block1, 1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 3Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: depression, Disease Activity, fibromyalgia, Patient reported outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Health Services Research Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Patient global assessment (PATGL) is a component of DAS28 (disease activity score 28) and CDAI (clinical disease activity index) to assess patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ASDAS (ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score) in axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), DAPSA (disease activity in psoriatic arthritis) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and other indices. PATGL generally reflects inflammatory activity in selected patients in clinical trials, who may, however, be fewer than 20% of all patients in routine care. PATGL and index scores may be elevated in the absence of inflammation due to fibromyalgia (FM) and/or depression (DEP). These conditions may be easily diagnosed but are often underrecognized. A feasible quantitative tool to identify FM or DEP could clarify interpretation of high PATGL and index scores in routine care, e.g., for treat-to-target, is available from 2 validated indices within a single multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), fibromyalgia assessment screening tool (FAST4) which agrees ~90% with 2011 revised FM criteria, and MDS2 (MDHAQ depression screen) agrees ~80% with reference HADS-D (hospital anxiety and depression scale–DEP). We analyzed patients seen in routine rheumatology care at two settings on different continents according to FAST4 and MDS2

Methods: The MDHAQ is a 2-page patient self-report questionnaire administered to all patients with all diagnoses in routine rheumatology care at two sites. The MDHAQ includes a 0-10 pain VNS, 0-10 fatigue VNS, 0-3.3 DEP query, self-report 0-54 patient painful joint count, 60-symptom checklist including DEP, medical history queries, and FAST4 and MDS2 indices. FAST4 indicates FM if 3/4 of: pain VNS ≥6/10, fatigue VNS ≥6/10, self-report painful joint count ≥16/54, and/or symptom checklist ≥16/60. MDS2 indicates DEP if 0-3.3 DEP response is ≥2.2 OR positive DEP on the symptom checklist. Median and interquartile range (IQR) for PATGL was computed according to primary diagnoses in patients who were FAST4-/MDS2-, FAST4+/MDS2-, FAST4-/MDS2+, and FAST4+/MDS2.

Results: Median PATGL in 928 unselected patients was 5.0 at both sites (range of medians of specific diagnoses 3.0-6.5, other than primary FM) (Table), higher in non-inflammatory vs inflammatory diagnoses, e.g, 5.0 at both sites in RA and 6.0-6.5 in OA (Table). Median PATGL was 3.0 and 3.3 in FAST4-/MDS2- patients (range 2.0-4.5 except primary FM), 5.0 in FAST4/MDS2+ (range 3.0-6.0 except if only 1 patient in category), 8.0 in FAST4+/MDS2- (range 6.5-9.0), and 8.0 in FAST4+/MDS2+ patients (range 6.5-10.0), similar at both sites.

Conclusion: Median 0-10 PATGL was 2-3-fold higher in FAST4+/MDS2+ patients than in FAST4-/MDS2-. Similar patterns were seen with most diagnoses other than for FM in primary FM, higher in non-inflammatory than in inflammatory diagnoses. These patterns were similar patterns at 2 independent sites on 2 continents. Differences according to FAST4 and MDS2 to screen for FM and DEP were considerably greater than according to any primary diagnosis, feasibly recognized on a single MDHAQ.

Supporting image 1

Table: Median patient global assessment in 928 patients with various rheumatic diagnoses at 2 sites, according to 2 feasibly collected and scored indices within a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), fibromyalgia assessment screening tool (FAST4) and MDHAQ depression screen (MDS2)

*=Only 1 patient in category, NA=No patient in category


Disclosures: T. Pincus, Medical History Services, LLC, Medical History Services LLC; K. Gibson, Eli Lilly Pty Ltd; J. Schmukler, None; T. Li, None; J. Block, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pincus T, Gibson K, Schmukler J, Li T, Block J. Median Patient Global Assessment Varies Far More According to FAST4 (fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tool) and MDS2 (MDHAQ Depression Screen) on a Single MDHAQ (multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire) Than According to Primary Diagnosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/median-patient-global-assessment-varies-far-more-according-to-fast4-fibromyalgia-assessment-screening-tool-and-mds2-mdhaq-depression-screen-on-a-single-mdhaq-multidimensional-health-assessment-qu/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/median-patient-global-assessment-varies-far-more-according-to-fast4-fibromyalgia-assessment-screening-tool-and-mds2-mdhaq-depression-screen-on-a-single-mdhaq-multidimensional-health-assessment-qu/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology