ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1258

Measurement of Specific Organ Domains in Lupus Randomised Controlled Trials

Kathryn Connelly1, Jeevan Vettivel2, Vera Golder2, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake2 and Eric Morand3, 1Monash University, Camberwell, Australia, 2Monash University, Clayton, Australia, 3Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: clinical trial, Outcome measures, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: Outcomes (1257–1303)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in SLE typically adopt composite responder definitions as primary efficacy endpoints, however outcomes within individual organ domains are also important to understand in order to infer the efficacy profile of a new treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate how, and how consistently, organ-specific disease activity and therapeutic responses have been measured and reported in lupus RCTs.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Johanna Briggs Institute Guidance and 2018 PRISMA statement. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane registry and clinicaltrials.gov. Eligible studies were RCTs investigating efficacy of an immune-directed drug therapy in active SLE, published January 2000-March 2021, excluding studies limited to lupus nephritis. Data items for each eligible RCT were general study/patient characteristics, and clinician-reported outcome measures of organ-specific disease activity at baseline and treatment response definitions at the primary endpoint. Data were extracted independently in duplicate into a pre-established form and summarised descriptively.

Results: A total of 34 RCTs were included (PRISMA diagram, Figure 1). Nine non-renal organ domains were measured using a limited number of instruments. Table 1 summarises the frequency of organ-specific involvement at baseline, and different response definitions used, across the RCTs. Study populations had a high, although variable, frequency of baseline musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous activity and low but also variable representation of other domains. Definitions of organ-specific responses were inconsistent, even within individual instruments. Response in most organ domains were evaluated using BILAG and SLEDAI components but meaningful comparison between treatment arms was limited by small subgroups analysed in post-hoc fashion. Outcome measures using Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index activity scores (CLASI-A) and joint counts (tender, swollen and/or active) were also commonly used, including within pre-specified organ-specific endpoints, which discriminated between treatment arms in some studies.

Conclusion: Mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal manifestations predominate in SLE RCTs. Organ-specific outcome measures are commonly reported, but definitions of involvement and response are inconsistent between trials. Research into the development of new outcome measures for key organ domains, and validation and comparison of response definitions using existing instruments is needed, to facilitate evaluation of the efficacy of novel therapies and ensure the validity, consistency, and comparability of individual organ responses within and between trials.

Figure 1: PRISMA diagram demonstrating study selection

Table 1: Definition and rates of organ-specific activity and treatment responses in the included RCTs, according to instruments employed in at least one study


Disclosures: K. Connelly, Janssen, 6; J. Vettivel, None; V. Golder, None; R. Kandane-Rathnayake, None; E. Morand, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Genetech, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 5, Neovacs, 2, Servier, 2, Wolf, 2, EMD Serono, 2, 5, Novartis, 6, Sandoz, 2, Sanofi, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Connelly K, Vettivel J, Golder V, Kandane-Rathnayake R, Morand E. Measurement of Specific Organ Domains in Lupus Randomised Controlled Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/measurement-of-specific-organ-domains-in-lupus-randomised-controlled-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/measurement-of-specific-organ-domains-in-lupus-randomised-controlled-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology