ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2503

Making Room for RA Patient Symptoms into Treatment Decision: A Physician Perspective Study

Iris Navarro-Millán1, Ronan O'Beirne2, Melanie Morris3, Bernadette Johnson1, James Willig4, Huifeng Yun5, Andrea Cherrington6, Liana Fraenkel7, Monika M. Safford8 and Jeffrey Curtis9, 1Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Continuing Medical Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Med - Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 6Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 7Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 8Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 9Division Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster III: Treatment – Monitoring, Outcomes, Adverse Events

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

 

Background/Purpose: Little is known on what subjective or objective data that rheumatologists consider most important for them to inform their treatment decisions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: To understand what data is most relevant for rheumatologists to inform treatment recommendations for their RA patients.

Methods: Participants were recruited nationally by email invitation to participate in one of 3 nominal groups held in March and April of 2016.  Each of the 3 groups generated a list of elements from their patients’ history, signs, and symptoms (‘items’), that they deemed helpful in making treatment decisions. The results of each group were combined into a single data set, categorized by a sorting procedure, in which items were independently reviewed and then aggregated into common topic groups, redundant or duplicate items were removed, and the topic groups were then identified according to the major theme emerging from each group. These themes were then evaluated through calculation of a rank-order coefficients based number of items in each theme, number of items in each theme ranked in the top 3 in terms of importance, and the average score for each item within a theme. 

Results: A total of 21 rheumatologists participated. Twelve themes emerged and 10 of these received ranking votes (Figure). Subjective information such as patient symptoms was the theme with the highest amount of votes (43%) while more objective data such as signs and tests captured only 21% of the ranking votes.  These physicians did not rank assessment of medication adherence very highly. Among the unranked themes, “social relationships” had the fourth highest number of items (7 items emerged but no votes to any for any of these items), consistent with the concept that rheumatologists are aware of patients’ social context for their health, but most do not yet recognize it as an important component in patients’ care.

Conclusion:  Most rheumatologists highly valued patients’ symptoms to inform their treatment decisions. Collection of subjective data from patients between physician appointments (e.g. via Smartphone technology), even for domains not directly related to RA (e.g. sleep symptoms), appears valuable to rheumatologists to have a more complete representation of RA patient’s health.     Figure: Themes that emerged during physician nominal groups regarding the elements of RA patient’s history, signs and symptoms they value the most and their respective percentage of votes  


Disclosure: I. Navarro-Millán, None; R. O'Beirne, None; M. Morris, None; B. Johnson, None; J. Willig, None; H. Yun, None; A. Cherrington, None; L. Fraenkel, None; M. M. Safford, None; J. Curtis, Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, Corrona, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 2,Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, Corrona, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Navarro-Millán I, O'Beirne R, Morris M, Johnson B, Willig J, Yun H, Cherrington A, Fraenkel L, Safford MM, Curtis J. Making Room for RA Patient Symptoms into Treatment Decision: A Physician Perspective Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/making-room-for-ra-patient-symptoms-into-treatment-decision-a-physician-perspective-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/making-room-for-ra-patient-symptoms-into-treatment-decision-a-physician-perspective-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology