ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1811

Lupus Patients, and Their Sisters, Have Higher Miscarriage Rates Than Healthy Women

Eliza Chakravarty1, David Miklos2, Nathan Pezant3, Fang Wu2, Indra Adrianto4, R. Hal Scofield3, Joel M. Guthridge5, Courtney Montgomery4 and Judith A. James4, 1Arthritis and Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 2Hematology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 3Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 4Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 5Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, OKC, OK

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: antibodies and pregnancy, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that primarily affects women during the childbearing years. Among its protean manifestation, pregnancy complications including premature delivery and preeclampsia are common. Most studies of pregnancy outcomes in women with SLE focus on complications occurring in the second half of pregnancy rather than evaluating spontaneous abortions (Sab, or miscarriage) that generally occur before 14 weeks of gestational age. While Sab occurs in up to 20% of all pregnancies and sporadic Sab is often attributed to karyotypic or genetic anomalies, it is possible that women with SLE experience higher rates of Sab than healthy women, and this may have an immunologic basis. The presence of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is the most commonly recognized risk factor for pregnancy morbidity; as late pregnancy morbidity or >3 consecutive Sab itself meets criteria for the syndrome. We sought to understand the incidence of Sab in a large cohort of SLE women, their unaffected sisters, and unrelated unaffected women.

Methods: Clinical data and stored sera from the Lupus Family Registry and Repository of 1608 parous women between ages 20-45 including SLE patients (by ACR criteria, n=832), sisters of SLE patients (n=337), and unaffected, unrelated women (n=439) were utilized. Complete reproductive history, including gestational age and outcome of all pregnancies, was available as was standardized SLE serologies. Additional autoantibodies, related to exposure to paternal antigens, included antibodies against HLA class I and II, and antibodies directed at minor histocompatibility antigens on the Y-chromosome and their X-homologues were assessed. Ratios of the number of Sab to the total numbers of pregnancies were compared between the three groups. Regression models were developed to better understand the role of auto-or allo-immunization and risk of Sab. Analyses were repeated using the subset of 1050 women who were APL negative.

Results: Both women with SLE and their unaffected sisters had higher Sab to total pregnancy ratios than healthy women in a dose-dependent fashion: Odds Ratio (OR)=1.43 (p=0.000049) for SLE and OR=1.28, (p=0.019) for sisters. Preliminary multivariate regression analyses found that only group and +APL antibodies were significantly associated with increased Sab, neither other standard SLE antibodies nor antibodies against HLA, HY, or HX were significant.

When women with +APL were removed from the analyses the Sab ratio remained significantly different for SLE (OR=1.37, p=0.0156), but not for sisters (OR=1.11, p=0.4029) compared to healthy women. Prevalence of autoantibodies did not modify the result in multivariate models.

Conclusion: SLE women have higher rates of Sab than healthy women, and sisters of SLE patients have intermediate rates. Autoantibodies do no explain these differences.

Table

Variable

SLE

Sisters

Controls

n

1396

580

564

age (mean, SD)

38.8 (7.2)*

40.17**

37.7 (7.6)

# pregnancies

2.8 (1.7)

3.0 (1.8)

2.8 (1.6)

# live births

1.8 (1.2)**

2.2 (1.3)

2.1 (1.2)

% with any Sab

39*

37

32

Sab: total pregnancy ratio

0.22**

0.17

0.15

% with +APL

40**

26

22

% with +ANA

90**

39**

21

% with ANA> 1:360

72**

17**

4

% with +dsDNA

27**

0

0

Women with -APL

SLE

Sisters

Controls

n

471

224

335

age (mean, SD)

38.9 (7.4)**

40.1 (7.2)**

37.6 (7.5)

# pregnancies

2.8 (1.5)

2.9(1.9)

2.8(1.5)

# live births

1.8(1.2)*

2.1(1.3)

2.1(1.2)

% with any Sab

38

34

34

Sab: total pregnancy ratio

0.19

0.16

0.16

* p<0.05, ** p<0.001 compared to controls by ANOVA


Disclosure: E. Chakravarty, None; D. Miklos, None; N. Pezant, None; F. Wu, None; I. Adrianto, None; R. H. Scofield, None; J. M. Guthridge, None; C. Montgomery, None; J. A. James, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chakravarty E, Miklos D, Pezant N, Wu F, Adrianto I, Scofield RH, Guthridge JM, Montgomery C, James JA. Lupus Patients, and Their Sisters, Have Higher Miscarriage Rates Than Healthy Women [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-patients-and-their-sisters-have-higher-miscarriage-rates-than-healthy-women/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lupus-patients-and-their-sisters-have-higher-miscarriage-rates-than-healthy-women/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology