Session Information
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose:
To determine whether socioeconomic status, as measured by education, impacts disease activity (measured by SLAM-2, SLEDAI-2K) or disease damage (measured by SLICC SDI) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods:
Data from the 1000 Canadian Faces of Lupus, a multi-center, prospective cohort database included adult SLE patients from June 2005 onward. Socioeconomic status, as measured by education was defined as being either low (did not complete high school) or high (completed high school or further). The relationships between education and SLE outcomes were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and logistic regression analyses.
Results: 484 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 47 years, 91.5% female, mean disease duration of 10 years); 80.4% had completed high school education or higher and 19.6% had not. One-way ANOVA analyses demonstrated: SLEDAI-2K (p=0.01), SLAM-2 (p<0.3) and SLICC (p=1.0). Proportionately more Aboriginal people were in the low education group (6.4% in high education vs. 17.9% in low education) and work disability was twice as common in low education group (13.6% vs. 28.4%). Income was higher in high education stratum. Logistic regression did not demonstrate significance between education and SLEDAI-2K when adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, and disease duration. See table for results.
*P<0.05 |
High SES |
Low SES |
Total (% of group) |
389 (80.4) |
95 (19.6) |
Female |
360 (92.5) |
83 (87.4) |
Age, mean (SD), years |
44.9 (12.8) |
54.9 (13.2) |
Ethnicity† Caucasian Black Asian Aboriginal |
287 (73.8) 38 (9.8) 39 (10) 25 (6.4) |
72 (75.8) 4 (4.2) 2 (2.1) 17 (17.9)* |
Work Disabled ¤ |
53 (13.6) |
27 (28.4)* |
Disease Duration |
10.4 (8.9) |
10.8 (9.6) |
Income Level†† Per annum household income <$15,000 $15,000 – $29,999 $30,000-$49,999 ≥$50,000 |
30 (7.7) 47 (12.1) 68 (17.5) 136 (35) |
19 (20) 8 (8.4) 16 (16.8) 8 (8.4)* |
Disease Activity SLAM-2 SLEDAI-2K |
6.01 (3.8) 4.40 (4.1) |
5.67(4.1) 5.67(5.2) |
Disease Damage SLICC |
1.34 (1.8) |
1.33 (1.8) |
Conclusion: This was mostly a prevalent, cohort so low income and work disability could be a result of SLE disease activity and damage. This cohort was literate and had access to lupus specialists so data may not be generalizable. Socioeconomic status, as measured by education, did not impact damage or disease activity in this cohort.
Disclosure:
A. George,
None;
C. Peschken,
None;
E. Silverman,
None;
C. A. Pineau,
None;
C. D. Smith,
None;
H. Arbillaga,
None;
M. Zummer,
None;
A. Clarke,
None;
S. Bernatsky,
None;
M. Hudson,
None;
C. A. Hitchon,
None;
P. R. Fortin,
None;
J. E. Pope,
None.
« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/low-socioeconomic-status-ses-as-measured-by-education-is-not-associated-with-worse-outcome-in-sle-data-from-the-1000-canadian-faces-of-lupus/