ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0327

Lipoprotein(a) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Is Associated with History of Proteinuria and Renal Insufficiency

Caoilfhionn Connolly1, Jessica Li2, Daniel Goldman3, Andrea Fava2, Laurence Magder4 and Michelle Petri3, 1Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, 2Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 3Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 4University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Cardiovascular, Renal, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Diagnosis (0323–0356)

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-recognized, independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Indeed, women with lupus have 2.66 times increased risk compared to controls, with both SLE-specific and traditional cardiovascular risk factors playing a role. In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated Lp(a) levels in patients with SLE and evaluated for an association between atherosclerotic events, thrombotic events, renal disease, and disease activity.

Methods: SLE patients fulfilling the revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or SLICC classification criteria with a measurement of Lp(a) were included in the analysis. A cutoff of 125 nmol/L was chosen based on expert opinion. Chi-square test was used to compare the differences between patient characteristics, including traditional and disease specific cardiovascular risk factors, and Lp(a) levels. Logistic regression or linear regression were used, where appropriate, to assess the association between Lp(a) values and the measured outcomes.

Results: 389 measurements of Lp(a), contributed from 375 patients were analyzed; 12 patients had 2 measurements and 1 had 3 measurements. Of these patients, 90% were female, 42% African American, and 47% Caucasian. The distribution of Lp(a) was heavily right skewed; values ranged from 8 to 671 nmol/L with a mean of 94 and median of 47nmol/L. Men, African American patients, patients with history of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were more likely to have Lp(a) levels >=125 nmol/L. Patients with a history of diabetes were less likely to have levels >=125 nmol/L (Table 1).

In this study, we did not observe an association between Lp(a) and atherosclerotic or thrombotic events. There was an association between elevated Lp(a) level and a history of proteinuria (OR 1.78, p-value=0.026). This association remained significant following adjustment for age, sex, race, low C3, and elevated anti-dsDNA (OR=1.74, p-value=0.0498). There was also an association with eGFR< 60 (p=0.03). Patients with higher Lp(a) levels also had higher physician global activity (p=0.02).

Conclusion: Consistent with the general population, Lp(a) levels skewed toward lower values in patients with SLE. There was not an association between Lp(a) and atherosclerotic or thrombotic events, but this may have been limited due to small sample size. Elevated levels of Lp(a) were associated with proteinuria, reduced eGFR and physician global activity, with an inverse association observed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. An increase in Lp(a) concentrations has previously reported in non-SLE renal disease even prior to reduction in eGFR. The role of Lp(a) as a potential biomarker for early renal disease and poor renal outcomes in SLE warrants further evaluation with consideration for more granular subphenotyping.

Table 1. Patient characteristics grouped by Lp(a). Lp(a) levels were grouped into <125 and >=125nmol/L

Table 2. Associations between events and Lp(a). Lp(a) levels were grouped into <125 and >=125nmol/L


Disclosures: C. Connolly, None; J. Li, None; D. Goldman, None; A. Fava, None; L. Magder, None; M. Petri, Alexion, 1, Amgen, 1, Astrazeneca, 1, 5, Aurinia, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 5, Emergent Biosolutions, 1, Exagen, 5, Gilead Biosciences, 2, GSK, 1, 5, IQVIA, 1, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, 2, Janssen, 1, 5, Merck EMD Serono, 1, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, 2, PPD Development, 1, Sanofi, 2, Thermofisher, 5, UCB Pharmaceuticals, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Connolly C, Li J, Goldman D, Fava A, Magder L, Petri M. Lipoprotein(a) in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Is Associated with History of Proteinuria and Renal Insufficiency [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lipoproteina-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-is-associated-with-history-of-proteinuria-and-renal-insufficiency/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lipoproteina-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-is-associated-with-history-of-proteinuria-and-renal-insufficiency/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology