ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2340

Lighten the Load: Artificial Intelligence Reveals Body Mass Index Outranks Treatment in One-Year Psoriatic Arthritis Outcomes—Findings from the SPEED Trial

Alexander Garaiman1, Sophia Massa1, Elnaz Saeedi2, Nicola Gullick3, William Tillett4, Raphaël Hurtubise1, jean-guillaume letarouilly5 and Laura Coates6, 1Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK., Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK., Oxford, 3Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK, Coventry, United Kingdom, 4Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, 5Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, Oxford, United Kingdom, 6Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biostatistics, body composition, body mass, Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2338–2376) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Personalizing care in early psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is challenging. We set out to identify predictors of one-year response on the PASDAS using AI-based methods to guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes.

Methods: We analyzed the SPEED trial, a multicenter, open-label study of patients with early PsA and poor prognostic factors. Participants were randomized to standard step-up csDMARD therapy, combination csDMARD therapy, or early TNF inhibitor induction. Recursive partitioning (RPART) modeling identified predictors of PASDAS response at 48 weeks based on baseline variables, including BMI, treatment arm, baseline PASDAS, disease phenotype, disease duration, sex, age, education level, smoking status, and alcohol use. This approach mirrors clinical reasoning by breaking complex data into clear, logical steps, generating a decision tree based on real-world patient characteristics. The resulting tree begins with the most influential predictor and branches by relevant cutoffs. An importance plot showed each variable’s contribution to the outcome, and decision rules derived from the tree offer actionable insights to guide personalized treatment.

Results: Among 192 patients (median age 49 [IQR: 34–58]; median BMI 28.96 kg/m² [IQR: 26.06–33.63]), baseline PASDAS was 5.60 (IQR: 4.94–6.34), improving to 3.84 (IQR: 2.38–4.99) at week 48, with 37.1% achieving “good” PASDAS (< 3.2). Most (82.8%) had polyarticular involvement; 53.5% were non-smokers, and 64.7% reported alcohol use.BMI was deemed the most influential baseline predictor of lower PASDAS at 48 weeks (fig. 1); treatment ranked sixth. The RPART-derived prediction rules reveal important trends in treatment response (tbl. 1, fig. 2): (1) patients with BMI < 25 kg/m² and lower baseline disease activity (PASDAS < 5.4) experienced the most favorable outcomes (predicted PASDAS = 2.1) at week 48—regardless of treatment type; (2) among patients with higher baseline disease activity (PASDAS ≥ 5.4) and BMI < 27 kg/m², early TNF inhibitor therapy was associated with better outcomes (PASDAS = 2.6) compared to standard or combination csDMARD therapy (PASDAS = 4.0), highlighting the potential benefit of early biologic intervention; (3) poorer outcomes were observed in patients with higher BMI (≥ 27 kg/m²), longer disease duration (≥ 12 months), and polyarticular disease, particularly among those aged 51–74, with predicted PASDAS scores reaching as high as 6.0. Findings highlight the cumulative negative effect of obesity, chronicity, and disease severity.

Conclusion: BMI was the most influential predictor of achieving a lower PASDAS at one year, even more so than treatment exposure. As a modifiable factor, maintaining a BMI below 27 kg/m²—ideally under 25 kg/m²— can significantly improve patient outcomes. High baseline disease activity, obesity, and chronicity predicted poorer responses, and in these groups, treatment with early TNF inhibitors was superior to csDMARDs reinforcing the need for aggressive therapy in such patients. The predictive rules derived from this analysis offer clinicians valuable insights to support personalized care and encourage patients to prioritize weight management as a key component of their PsA treatment strategy.

Supporting image 1 Table 1. Recursive partitioning-derived prediction rules for PASDAS at week 48

Supporting image 2Figure 1. Variable Importance Plot from Recursive Partitioning Model Identifying Key Predictors of ASDAS at One Year

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Decision Tree Plot Depicting Prediction Rules for One-Year PASDAS Based on BMI and Other Baseline Characteristics.

Each node represents a decision point based on key patient characteristics (e.g., BMI, baseline PASDAS). The final leaves show the predicted PASDAS score at 48 weeks, with the numbers representing the mean PASDAS value and the percentage indicating the proportion of patients in that group. To interpret the tree, follow the path from the root to the leaves, where each branch splits based on the patient’s characteristics, leading to a predicted treatment outcome.


Disclosures: A. Garaiman: None; S. Massa: None; E. Saeedi: None; N. Gullick: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Alfasigma, 2, AstraZeneca, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; W. Tillett: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Ono Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Takeda, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; R. Hurtubise: Biojamp, 6, Celltrion, 6, UCB, 6; j. letarouilly: Abbvie, 6, Celltrion, 6, Janssen, 6, MSD, 6, Pfizer, 6; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Domain, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Garaiman A, Massa S, Saeedi E, Gullick N, Tillett W, Hurtubise R, letarouilly j, Coates L. Lighten the Load: Artificial Intelligence Reveals Body Mass Index Outranks Treatment in One-Year Psoriatic Arthritis Outcomes—Findings from the SPEED Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lighten-the-load-artificial-intelligence-reveals-body-mass-index-outranks-treatment-in-one-year-psoriatic-arthritis-outcomes-findings-from-the-speed-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/lighten-the-load-artificial-intelligence-reveals-body-mass-index-outranks-treatment-in-one-year-psoriatic-arthritis-outcomes-findings-from-the-speed-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology