ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1521

Latent Tuberculosis Screening and Treatment In Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients Eligible For Anti-TNF Therapy In Endemic Area

Renata Miossi1, Karina Rossi Bonfiglioli1, Carla G.S. Saad2, Ana Cristina Ribeiro1, Julio C. B. Moraes2 and Eloisa Bonfá1, 1Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Reumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), tuberculosis and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment: II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Anti-TNF agents have emerged as an important treatment for rheumatic diseases, particularly for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is essential before the use of these drugs. However, current recommendationsfor this screening and treatment and their efficacy are still not well established in endemic regions. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate, in an endemic area, the efficacy of LTBI screening and treatment in AS patients under anti-TNF. 

Methods: One hundred and ten AS patients eligible for anti-TNF agents were initially screened for LTBI by tuberculin skin test (TST), chest X-ray and history of contact. Patients were regularly followed at 1-3 months interval, from June 2004 to January 2013.

Results: LTBI screening was positive in 48 (43.6%) patients. TST positivity accounted for majority of LTBI diagnosis (46; 95.2%): 39 (81.2%) solely positive TST, 6 (12.5%) with positive TST and history of contact, 1 (2.1%) with positive TST and abnormal chest X-ray and 2 (4.2%) with isolated history of contact. These patients received at least 1 month isoniazid before starting anti-TNF treatment and all of them completed 6 months of isoniazid treatment.Two patients developed TB in spite of LTBI treatment: one was a medical doctor with proven exposure to TB after 8 months receiving adalimumab, and the other became symptomatic right after the second dose of adalimumab, and probably had active TB that was misdiagnosed as LTBI. Sixty seven (60.9%) patients were treated with one anti-TNF, 33 (30%) with two and 10 (9.1%) with three (86 infliximab, 49 adalimumab and 75 etanercept). Thirty three (30%) patients were under prednisone, mean dose 10.6 mg/day. No difference was observed in TST positivity rate in this group comparing with the patients without this drug (48.5% vs. 39%, p=0.40). TST was repeated in 9/64 (14%) patients initially screened negative in case of prolonged discontinuation and reintroduction of biologic treatment (n=2) or clinical tuberculosis (TB) suspicion (n=7). In the latter group, TST conversion was observed in 3 patients diagnosed with active pulmonary TB. Median duration of anti-TNF treatment (2 adalimumab e 1 infliximab) in these three patients before the diagnosis of TB was 1.8 (0.6 – 3.5) years. 

Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that TBLI screening and treatment is also efficient for endemic areas. In addition, we report that new exposure accounts for nearly all cases of TB infection and further demonstrate that symptom guided TST repetition is very effective for TB diagnosis during anti-TNF therapy in high TB incidence region.


Disclosure:

R. Miossi,
None;

K. R. Bonfiglioli,
None;

C. G. S. Saad,

Federico Foundation,

2;

A. C. Ribeiro,
None;

J. C. B. Moraes,
None;

E. Bonfá,

FAPESP #2009/51897-5 and 2010/10749-0, CNPq 301411/2009-3 and Federico Foundation,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/latent-tuberculosis-screening-and-treatment-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-patients-eligible-for-anti-tnf-therapy-in-endemic-area/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology