ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1552

Kinetics of Mucocutaneous and Musculoskeletal Responses to Deucravacitinibin Patients with Active SLE in the Phase 2 PAISLEY Trial

Ronald Van Vollenhoven1, Joseph Merola2, Kathryn H. Dao3, Piotr Leszczynski4, Marilyn Pike5, Samantha Pomponi6, Coburn Hobar6, Matthew J. Colombo6, Ravi Koti6, Subhashis Banerjee6, Thomas Wegman7 and Eric Morand8, 1Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2UT Southwestern Medical Center, Newton, MA, 3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, 4Department of Internal Medicine, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland, 5Rheumatology, MedPharm Consulting, Inc., Raleigh, NC, 6Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 7Bristol Myers Squibb, Beaver Falls, PA, 8School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: clinical trial, Cutaneous, Outcome measures, Randomized Trial, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: SLE – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Deucravacitinib is a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor approved in multiple countries for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The 48-week, double-blind, phase 2 PAISLEY trial in patients with active SLE (NCT03252587) met its primary endpoint and all key secondary endpoints at the deucravacitinib 3-mg twice-daily (BID) dose vs placebo. In this post hoc analysis, response rates over time were evaluated for ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score in patients with a baseline CLASI activity score ≥ 10 (CLASI-50), ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in active (swollen plus tender) joint count in patients with ≥ 6 active joints at baseline (JC-50), and other key secondary endpoints.

Methods: Patients with active SLE receiving standard of care were randomized 1:1:1:1 to placebo (n = 90) or deucravacitinib 3 mg BID (n = 91), 6 mg BID (n = 93), or 12 mg once daily (QD; n = 89). Previous reporting from PAISLEY used strict nonresponder imputation criteria with several conditions considered a nonresponse applied after week 20, including not achieving a glucocorticoid dose of ≤ 7.5 mg/day by week 20, resulting in different imputation methods used before vs after week 20. Here, we characterize disease activity improvement in 2 key lupus manifestations, imputing only missing data as nonresponse (M=NR) through week 48 and assessing response rate kinetics using the same imputation method throughout.

Results: Patients receiving deucravacitinib had numerically higher CLASI-50 response rates than those receiving placebo starting at week 4 (placebo, 4.2%; 3 mg BID, 21.7%; 6 mg BID, 8.0%; 12 mg QD, 27.6%) (Figure 1A); robust differences were maintained through week 48. Numerical differences in JC-50 response rates were first observed at week 8 (placebo, 54.7%; 3 mg BID, 69.8%; 6 mg BID, 73.8%; 12 mg QD, 59.7%) and became more notable from week 24 (Figure 1B). Differences in responses of both organs were maintained with deucravacitinib beyond week 20, after the protocol-mandated glucocorticoid taper.

Conclusion: These data suggest that higher response rates with deucravacitinib vs placebo occur early on for mucocutaneous and somewhat later for musculoskeletal manifestations. Permitted concomitant glucocorticoid use may partially explain the placebo group responses. Robust differences were seen after the glucocorticoid taper, further supporting the efficacy of deucravacitinib.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: R. Van Vollenhoven: AbbVie, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, Biogen, 2, Biotest, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, GSK, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, 12, Support for educational programs, Roche, 12, Support for educational programs, Servier, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; J. Merola: AbbVie, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Amgen, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, AstraZeneca, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Biogen, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Boehringer Ingelheim, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Bristol Myers Squibb, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Dermavant, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Eli Lilly, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Janssen, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, MoonLake, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Novartis, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Pfizer, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Sanofi-Regeneron, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, Sun Pharma, 12, Consultant and/or investigator, UCB, 12, Consultant and/or investigator; K. Dao: Bristol Myers Squibb, 2; P. Leszczynski: AbbVie, 6, AstraZeneca, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, UCB, 6; M. Pike: AstraZeneca, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Pfizer, 2, UCB, 2; S. Pomponi: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 12, Shareholder; C. Hobar: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 12, Shareholder; M. Colombo: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 8; R. Koti: Bristol Myers Squibb, 12, Employee of Syneos Health, providing statistical services to Bristol Myers Squibb, at the time of study conduct; S. Banerjee: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 8; T. Wegman: Bristol Myers Squibb, 3, 8; E. Morand: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Dragonfly, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, EMD Serono, 2, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, RemeGen, 2, Roche, 5, 6, Takeda, 2, 5, UCB, 5, Zenas, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Van Vollenhoven R, Merola J, Dao K, Leszczynski P, Pike M, Pomponi S, Hobar C, Colombo M, Koti R, Banerjee S, Wegman T, Morand E. Kinetics of Mucocutaneous and Musculoskeletal Responses to Deucravacitinibin Patients with Active SLE in the Phase 2 PAISLEY Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/kinetics-of-mucocutaneous-and-musculoskeletal-responses-to-deucravacitinibin-patients-with-active-sle-in-the-phase-2-paisley-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/kinetics-of-mucocutaneous-and-musculoskeletal-responses-to-deucravacitinibin-patients-with-active-sle-in-the-phase-2-paisley-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology