ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 101

Kidney Function and the Risk of Incident Gout in A Population-Based Cohort of Adults: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Mara McAdams DeMarco1, Anna Kottgen2, Andrew Law3, Janet W. Maynard4, Josef Coresh1 and Alan N. Baer5, 1Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 2Renal Division, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 3Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, 4Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 5Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services Research: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Rheumatic Disease I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  The 1-year cumulative incidence of gout in patients with new onset end stage renal disease is 5% and rises to 15% by 5 years, far exceeding the risk in the general population. This higher prevalence of gout could be explained by hyperuricemia as a consequence of reduced renal function and subsequent development of gout or due to common risk factors. Although the risk of developing gout is high among those with end stage renal disease, the risk of gout for those with moderate kidney dysfunction is unclear. We estimated the risk of developing gout over a range of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in participants enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort study.

Methods: ARIC is a prospective population-based cohort recruited in 1987-1989 from 4 US communities, consisting of 4 visits over 9 years. Participants were included in this analysis if they answered the gout query and were free of gout at baseline. Incident gout was defined as self-reported onset after baseline. Serum creatinine was estimated using a modified kinetic Jaffé reaction. Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using the CKD-Epi equation and categorized as ≥90, 60-90, or <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Using a Cox Proportional Hazards model (age as time scale), we estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of incident gout by baseline eGFR, adjusted for confounders (sex, race, and center) and clinical factors (diuretic use, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and alcohol intake). Additionally, we adjusted for visit 2 serum urate level (measured with the uricase method) to test for mediation.

Results: A total of 10,871 ARIC participants met the study criteria. The study population was 43% male, 21% African American and the mean age at cohort entry was 54 years (SD=5.7). The mean eGFR was 92 (SD=14.9) ml/min/1.73 m2. At baseline, 217 (2%) participants were classified as having eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2; 4,502 (41%) with an eGFR between 60 and 90 ml/min/1.73 m2; and 6,152 with an eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2 (57%). There were 274 incident gout cases. The results are presented in the table. After accounting for confounders and clinical factors, a 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 decrease in eGFR was associated with increased risk of gout (HR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.10-1.25). Compared to those with an eGFR ≥90, the adjusted HR of incident gout was 1.13 (95% CI: 0.88-1.46) for those with an eGFR between 60 and 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 2.57 (95% CI: 1.58-4.17) for those with an eGFR< 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. eGFR was not associated with incident gout after accounting for V2 serum urate level, suggesting full mediation. There was no evidence of effect measure modification by race (p=0.46) or sex (p=0.39).

 

Table. Risk of Gout by eGFR

 

HR of Gout

(95% CI)

P-value

Model 1: Unadjusted

 

 

eGFR for each 10 unit decrease

1.12 (1.03, 1.22)

0.004

eGFR≥90

Ref

0.01

60£eGFR<90

1.08 (0.84, 1.38)

 

eGFR <60

2.80 (1.74, 4.50)

 

 

 

 

Model 2: Adjusted  sex, race, and center

 

 

eGFR for each 10 unit decrease

1.18 (1.09, 1.27)

<0.0001

eGFR≥90

Ref

0.002

60£eGFR<90

1.17 (0.91, 1.51)

 

eGFR <60

2.93 (1.82, 4.73)

 

 

 

 

Model 3: Adjusted sex, race, center, diuretic use, hypertension, diabeties, obesity, continuous alcohol intake

 

 

eGFR for each 10 unit decrease

1.15 (1.10, 1.25)

0.0003

eGFR≥90

Ref

0.009

60£eGFR<90

1.13 (0.88, 1.46)

 

eGFR <60

2.57 (1.58, 4.17)

 

Model 4: Adjusted sex, race, center, diuretic use, hypertension, diabeties, obesity, continuous alcohol intake, serum urate level at visit 2.

 

 

eGFR for each 10 unit decrease

0.97 (0.90, 1.05)

0.47

eGFR≥90

Ref

0.20

60£eGFR<90

0.82 (0.63, 1.06)

 

eGFR <60

0.88 (0.52, 1.48)

 

Conclusion: Moderately reduced kidney function was associated with a 2.6-fold increased risk of gout independent of comorbid conditions. These findings suggest that kidney function may be a risk factor for gout that is partially mediated by increased serum urate levels.


Disclosure:

M. McAdams DeMarco,

Takdeda Pharmaceuticals,

2;

A. Kottgen,
None;

A. Law,
None;

J. W. Maynard,
None;

J. Coresh,
None;

A. N. Baer,

Takeda Pharmaceutocals,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/kidney-function-and-the-risk-of-incident-gout-in-a-population-based-cohort-of-adults-atherosclerosis-risk-in-communities-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology