ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2153

Key Differences Between US Rheumatologists’ and Dermatologists’ Management of Psoriatic Arthritis

Maxine Yarnall, Spherix Global Insights, Exton, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Interleukins, Psoriatic arthritis, skin

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2022

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster III: PsA

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The last few years have seen the approval of many new agents for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (PSO), resulting in greater options for managing moderate to severe disease. Many of these newer agents (guselkumab, upadacitinib, risankizumab) have been approved for both PSO and PsA.

As such, dermatologists’ biologic armamentarium closely parallels that of rheumatologists. With many PSO patients progressing to include joint involvement, managing joint disease has become more important. Most dermatologists are more confident in their ability to manage PsA without rheumatologists than in the past, with a subset further agreeing they treat patients for longer periods of time.

Methods: An independent market analytics firm collaborated with US rheumatologists and dermatologists in 2021 and 2022 to conduct a retrospective chart review of PsA patients who were recently switched from one advanced treatment to another (2022: 219 rheumatologists, 998 patient charts and 113 dermatologists, 510 patient charts. 2021: 203 rheumatologists, 1,022 patient charts and 157 dermatologists, 510 patient charts) in the prior twelve weeks. Physicians were able to submit up to seven patient charts. Data included patient demographics as well as physician demographics and attitudinal survey responses.

Results: Rheumatologist-treated patients have a more severe form of PsA when compared to those treated by dermatologists. However, more dermatologists are treating moderate and severe PsA when compared to 2021. PSO severity also tends to be higher among dermatologist-treated patients.

Switching patterns have remained relatively stable when compared to 2021 with Dermatologists reporting substantially greater switches from apremilast than rheumatologists. Rheumatologists were more likely to switch patients to TNFs when compared to dermatologists, with dermatologists reporting a higher incidence of switching to IL-17s and IL-23s. Rheumatologists switching patients to JAKs is lower than in 2021.

The level of co-management between the two specialties also varies. More dermatologists indicate co-management with a rheumatologist than those reported by a rheumatologist. Substantially more rheumatologists also report making the decision to switch patients without input from the dermatologist than the converse.

Conclusion: There exists several differences in the ways rheumatologists and dermatologists care for PsA patients. While dermatologists tend to see milder cases, they are primarily focused on treating skin manifestations, but the availability of a wider treatment armamentarium also means they are becoming more comfortable in treating other manifestations and therefore are more likely to feel confident in treating patients for longer periods of time before involving rheumatologists.

Rheumatologists are primarily concerned with treating joint disease and are more likely to refer to dermatologists in cases of uncontrolled skin manifestations. Rheumatologists are also less likely to involve dermatologists in treatment than vice-versa.

Supporting image 1

PsA Severity at Time of Switch: Rheumatology vs. Dermatology

Supporting image 2

PSO Severity at Time of Switch: Rheumatology vs. Dermatology

Supporting image 3

Switching Patterns: Rheumatology vs. Dermatology


Disclosures: M. Yarnall, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yarnall M. Key Differences Between US Rheumatologists’ and Dermatologists’ Management of Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/key-differences-between-us-rheumatologists-and-dermatologists-management-of-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/key-differences-between-us-rheumatologists-and-dermatologists-management-of-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology