ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1293

Is Virtual Care Here to Stay? : Rheumatology Patients’ Satisfaction in Early vs Late Pandemic

Ummugulsum Gazel1, Tommy Han2, Seyyid Bilal Acikgoz3, Tara Swami1, Hart goldhar4, Urusa Shah3, Rokshana Chowdhury3, Nataliya Milman3, Nancy Maltez1, Catherine Ivory1, Susan Humphrey-Murto3 and Sibel Aydin1, 1University of Ottawa, Rheumatology, Ottawa, Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2University of Ottawa, Medical School, Ottawa, Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 3University of Ottawa, Rheumatology, Ottawa, Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 4William Osler Health Centre Etobicoke General Site, Rheumatology, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: COVID-19, quality of care, Surveys

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed the delivery of healthcare, with virtual care becoming the new standard. In the early stages of the pandemic, physicians were very creative to rapidly adapt to virtual care and studies reported high levels of patient satisfaction. It is unclear whether this high level of satisfaction would be maintained long term, after patients experience multiple virtual visits. We aimed to compare patients’ satisfaction with virtual visits in the early and late period of the Covid-19 pandemic and to determine the impacting factors in patients’ satisfaction.

Methods: We sent patient satisfaction surveys with virtual visits to patients who had at least one virtual visit during the early Covid-19 pandemic (May 2020-Sept 2020). Patients who agreed to participate in an extension study received a similar survey to reflect their satisfaction levels for their later visits between Aug 2021-May 2022. Chi-square tests was used for comparisons for early vs late pandemic satisfaction levels and factors impacting the satisfaction levels were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: A total of 741 and 270 patients responded to surveys in the early and late Covid-19 pandemic periods respectively. Patient demographics for both periods were similar for age, sex and diagnosis (table-1-2). Overall satisfaction levels decreased in the later stages in comparison to the early stages with 89% vs 81.2%, respectively, p=0.003) patients reporting they were satisfied to very satisfied with virtual care. Despite the reduced satisfaction levels in the late period, 55.5 % of the patients still declared their willingness to continue with virtual care even after the pandemic, a similar result to early pandemic (Figure). In multivariate analysis, speaking with a rheumatologist (p=0.035; OR (95%CI) 1.921 (1.047-3.526)), being called on time (p< 0.001; OR (95%CI) 4.807(2.330-9.915)) and capability of using phone (p< 0.001, OR (95%CI) 4.361(2.503-7.597)) were found to be associated with overall satisfaction in the early period. In the late Covid-19 pandemic period, being called on time (p=0.038; OR (95%CI) 2.333(1.046-4.768)) and capability of using phone (p=0.001; OR (95%CI) 3.516 (1.729-7.150)) were found to be associated with overall satisfaction. However, there was no association between speaking with a rheumatologist vs a resident and overall satisfaction in the late Covid-19 pandemic period (p=0.263; OR (95%CI) 1.639(0.690-3.892)).

Conclusion: Our results suggested that while the patients’ satisfaction with the virtual visit decreased slightly over time, approximately 80% of the patients still are satisfied with virtual care. In addition, more than half of the patients support ongoing virtual visits after the pandemic. This study has important implications for policy decision makers as they consider resource allocation for long term virtual care.

Supporting image 1

Table_1: Patient demographics, characteristic of virtual visits and background information about phone visits

Supporting image 2

Table_2: The comparison of factors affecting the patient satisfaction in early and late Covid_19 pandemic period.

Supporting image 3

Figure: The patients’ thoughts and satisfaction on the virtual visit in early and late Covid_19 pandemic period


Disclosures: U. Gazel, None; T. Han, None; S. Acikgoz, None; T. Swami, None; H. goldhar, AbbVie/Abbott, Fresenius Kabi; U. Shah, None; R. Chowdhury, None; N. Milman, None; N. Maltez, None; C. Ivory, None; S. Humphrey-Murto, None; S. Aydin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gazel U, Han T, Acikgoz S, Swami T, goldhar H, Shah U, Chowdhury R, Milman N, Maltez N, Ivory C, Humphrey-Murto S, Aydin S. Is Virtual Care Here to Stay? : Rheumatology Patients’ Satisfaction in Early vs Late Pandemic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-virtual-care-here-to-stay-rheumatology-patients-satisfaction-in-early-vs-late-pandemic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-virtual-care-here-to-stay-rheumatology-patients-satisfaction-in-early-vs-late-pandemic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology