ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 130

Is There Clinically Relevant Plasma Interference with ELISA Detection of APS Antibodies? Reproducibility of Serum and Plasma Testing in a Real-World Clinical Setting

Michael Pham1, Giovanni Orsolini 2, Cynthia Crowson 3, Melissa Snyder 1, Rajiv Pruthi 4 and Kevin Moder 5, 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2University of Verona, Verona, Italy, 3Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, 4Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 5Mayo Clinic Rochester, rochester, MN

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Antiphospholipid, Antiphospholipid antibodies, Diagnostic Tests and antiphospholipid syndrome, Enzyme-Linked Immunoabsorbant Assays (ELISA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Traditionally in ELISA detection of APS antibodies, the use of serum is thought to be preferable over plasma according to international consensus bodies.  The dilution effects of citrate in the plasma blood draw tube or matrix effects with fibrinogen are some of the cited concerns.  However, there is scarcity of clinical data comparing reproducibility of APS antibody detection in serum versus plasma.  The purpose of this study was to determine reproducibility of anti-cardiolipin (aCL), beta2-glycoprotein-1 (β2GP1), and phosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS-PT) antibody detection between serum and plasma in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods: Patients with clinical serum draws for IgG/IgM aCL, β2GP1, and aPS-PT antibodies were identified, and same-day, platelet-poor citrated plasma samples were obtained for repeat ELISA testing with commercially available ELISA assays. Quantitative levels were determined for each isotype without citrate volume correction and further stratified into Negative (< 15.0 GPL/MPL or U/mL), Weakly Positive (15.0-39.9), or Positive (≥40.0) reference cutoff categories. Median and mean differences along with inter-sample reliability were compared using Wilcoxon paired signed-rank method and kappa coefficients, respectively.

Results: One hundred fifty patients were identified for study with 134 aCL, 110 β2GP1, and 7 aPS-PT serum samples eligible for repeat plasma testing.  Mean age was 49±16 years.  About 69% were female, 87% were Caucasian, 21% with APS, and 13% with SLE.  As shown in Table 1, median differences were generally 0.0 units and mean differences largely falling within 2 units.  The differences were technically statistically significant.  There was strong inter-sample agreement in reference cutoff category with kappa coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 1.00.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, we present the largest study examining the reproducibility of APS antibodies on paired serum and plasma samples in a real-world clinical setting.  Small differences were detected between serum and plasma for aCL and β2GP1 antibodies with similar trends in aPS-PT antibodies.  Although the observed differences were statistically significant, the magnitude of the differences was small and the clinical relevance is likely negligible.  Moreover, with kappa coefficients of at least 0.80, there was strong inter-sample agreement in reporting negative, weakly positive and positive categories for aCL and β2GP1 antibodies.  These results suggest serum and plasma could be used interchangeably for ELISA detection of antiphospholipid antibodies in a clinical setting.


zACR_Serum vs Plasma APS antibodies_PDF TABLE


Disclosure: M. Pham, None; G. Orsolini, None; C. Crowson, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Crescendo BioScience Inc., 5, Crescendo Bioscience Inc., 5, Crescendo Biosciences inc., 5, Pfizer, 2; M. Snyder, None; R. Pruthi, None; K. Moder, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pham M, Orsolini G, Crowson C, Snyder M, Pruthi R, Moder K. Is There Clinically Relevant Plasma Interference with ELISA Detection of APS Antibodies? Reproducibility of Serum and Plasma Testing in a Real-World Clinical Setting [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-there-clinically-relevant-plasma-interference-with-elisa-detection-of-aps-antibodies-reproducibility-of-serum-and-plasma-testing-in-a-real-world-clinical-setting/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-there-clinically-relevant-plasma-interference-with-elisa-detection-of-aps-antibodies-reproducibility-of-serum-and-plasma-testing-in-a-real-world-clinical-setting/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology