ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 702

Is Skin Disease More Important to Patients or Physicians in the Assessment of Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis?

Dalton Sholter1, Proton Rahman2, J Antonio Avina-Zubieta3, John Kelsall4, Regan Arendse5, Majed M. Khraishi6, S Shaikh7, William G. Bensen8, Emmanouil Rampakakis9, John S. Sampalis10, Francois Nantel11, May Shawi12, Susan Otawa13, Cathy Tkaczyk13 and Allen J Lehman12, 1Rheumatology Associates, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2Rheumatology, St. Clare's Mercy Hospital, St. John's, NF, Canada, 3Medicine, University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Mary Pack Arthritis Centre, Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 6Nexus Clinical Research, St Johns, NF, Canada, 7Niagara Peninsula Arthritis Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 8St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 9JSS Medical Research, St-Laurent, QC, Canada, 10McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 1119 Green belt Dr, Janssen Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 12Janssen Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 13Medical Affairs, Janssen Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Outcome measures, Psoriatic arthritis, registry and skin

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I: Clinical Aspects and Assessments

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Patient (PtGA) and physician (MDGA) global assessment of disease activity are standard outcome measures used in clinical practice and research to ascertain patient and physician subjective perception of disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Given that the PtGA and MDGA measure the same construct from two different perspectives, assessing their concordance may provide valuable insight on patient and physician differences with respect to the relative importance placed on specific disease parameters. The aim of this analysis was to assess the agreement between PtGA and MDGA, and to compare the correlation of PtGA or MDGA with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in PsA patients treated with infliximab (IFX) in a Canadian real-world, routine clinical practice setting.

Methods:

BioTRAC is an ongoing, prospective registry of patients initiating treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or PsA with IFX or golimumab as first biologics or after having been treated with a biologic for <6 months. Eligible people for this analysis included PsA patients treated with IFX who were enrolled between 2005 and 2012. The correlation between disease parameters was assessed with the Spearman’s rho coefficient (r), while the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha (CA) was used to assess internal consistency.

Results:

A total of 92 patients (52.2% male) were included with a mean (SD) age of 48.7 (9.9) years and disease duration of 6.8 (9.1) years. At baseline, mean (SD) disease parameters were: PASI = 3.3 (5.6); swollen joint count (SJC28) = 4.0 (3.8); tender joint count (TJC28) = 5.9 (5.3); PtGA = 5.0 (2.8); MDGA = 5.8 (2.2) cm. Prior to IFX initiation, 78 (84.8%) patients had been treated with a traditional DMARD (71.7% with methotrexate).Overall, a strong agreement was observed between PtGA and MDGA (r=0.632). The correlation of PASI with PtGA was low (r=0.213), whereas it was moderate with MDGA (r=0.343) (Figure 1). Overall, internal consistency was poor between PASI and both PtGA (CA = 0.373, ICC = 0.229) and MDGA (CA = 0.445, ICC = 0.286) although it was higher with the latter. Multivariate linear regression resulted in the exclusion of PtGA from the model, also supporting the stronger association of MDGA with PASI. When considering other disease parameters, PtGA showed a very strong correlation with pain (r=0.885) and strong with HAQ-DI (r=0.596),whereas a strong correlation was observed between MDGA and both pain and HAQ-DI (r=0.652 and r=0.520, respectively).

Conclusion:

The results of this analysis show that the association of PASI is stronger with MDGA when compared to PtGA. However, patient-reported pain and HAQ-DI were better correlated with PtGA and MDGA when compared to PASI, suggesting that both patients and rheumatologists place more emphasis on pain and functional activity than on skin symptoms when evaluating the global status of PsA.


Disclosure: D. Sholter, Janssen Inc., 5; P. Rahman, Janssen Inc, 5; J. A. Avina-Zubieta, Janssen Inc., 5; J. Kelsall, Janssen Inc., 5; R. Arendse, Janssen Inc., 5; M. M. Khraishi, Janssen Inc., 5; S. Shaikh, Janssen Inc., 5; W. G. Bensen, Janssen Inc., 5; E. Rampakakis, JSS Medical Research, a Contract Research Organization, 3; J. S. Sampalis, JSS Medical Research, 3; F. Nantel, Janssen Inc., 3; M. Shawi, Janssen Inc., 3; S. Otawa, Janssen Inc., 3; C. Tkaczyk, Janssen Inc., 3; A. J. Lehman, Janssen Inc., 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sholter D, Rahman P, Avina-Zubieta JA, Kelsall J, Arendse R, Khraishi MM, Shaikh S, Bensen WG, Rampakakis E, Sampalis JS, Nantel F, Shawi M, Otawa S, Tkaczyk C, Lehman AJ. Is Skin Disease More Important to Patients or Physicians in the Assessment of Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-skin-disease-more-important-to-patients-or-physicians-in-the-assessment-of-disease-activity-in-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-skin-disease-more-important-to-patients-or-physicians-in-the-assessment-of-disease-activity-in-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology