ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1316

Is MRI of Use in Identifying Which Undifferentiated Arthritis Patients Will Develop RA?

W.P. Nieuwenhuis1, E.C. Newsum1, H.W. van Steenbergen2, L. Mangnus1, T. W. J. Huizinga1, M. Reijnierse3 and A.H.M. van der Helm- van Mil2, 1Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II: X-ray, MRI, PET and CT

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) identify RA patients earlier than the 1987 ACR criteria. However, still a considerable amount of patients not fulfilling the 2010 criteria or other rheumatic diagnoses (i.e. undifferentiated arthritis, UA) develop RA.1,2Previous studies revealed that auto-antibodies and existing prediction rules fail to identify the UA patients that will progress to RA. In this observational study we studied the use of MRI-detected inflammation to identify these UA patients.

Methods:

202 patients presenting with 2010UA consecutively included in our early arthritis cohort were studied. Unilateral, 1.5T extremity MRI of the metacarpophalangeal, wrist and metatarsophalangeal joints was performed at baseline. Bone marrow edema (BME), synovitis and tenosynovitis were scored according the RA MRI scoring system by 2 independent readers blinded for clinical data. MRI positivity was defined as the presence of inflammation with a prevalence <5% in age matched symptom free controls. Clinical and laboratory findings were also recorded. Two outcome measures were studied; fulfilling the 1987 ACR RA criteria and initiation of DMARD therapy within the first year.

Results:

The 202 UA-patients had a median symptom duration of 8.7 weeks; 29 patients (14%) progressed to RA and 75 (37%) started DMARD therapy. A positive MRI for any MRI inflammation was associated with both RA development (OR 6.1 95%CI 1.4-26.8) as well as initiation of DMARD-therapy (OR 2.4 95%CI 1.2- 4.6). When assessing the MRI features BME, synovitis and tenosynovitis separately, only tenosynovitis was associated with RA development and initiation of DMARD-therapy (OR 5.4 95%CI 1.9-15.2 and OR 4.2 95%CI 2.3-7.8 respectively). When evaluating traditional inflammatory measures, the swollen joint count at baseline (SJC) and C-reactive protein level at baseline (CRP) were also associated with RA-development, in contrast to the presence of ACPA or RF. Multivariable analyses including SJC and CRP with RA-development as outcome, yielded ORs of 5.6 (95%CI 1.2-25.6) for any MRI detected inflammation and 6.3 (95%CI 2.1-19.3) for MRI detected tenosynovitis. Similar analyses with initiation of DMARD therapy as outcome yielded ORs of 1.8 (95%CI 0.9-3.6) and 3.6 (95%CI 1.9-6.9) respectively.

Conclusion:

Within 2010UA, a positive MRI was associated with RA development, independent of commonly used measures of inflammation (SJC, CRP). MRI detected tenosynovitis in particular was most predictive. The next step is to determine the clinical benefit of extremity MRI to enable an early diagnosis of RA.

References:

  1. Krabben A et al. Ann Rheum Dis2012;71:238–41.
  2. Krabben A et al. Rheumatology 2013;52:1265–70.

Disclosure: W. P. Nieuwenhuis, None; E. C. Newsum, None; H. W. van Steenbergen, None; L. Mangnus, None; T. W. J. Huizinga, None; M. Reijnierse, None; A. H. M. van der Helm- van Mil, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nieuwenhuis WP, Newsum EC, van Steenbergen HW, Mangnus L, Huizinga TWJ, Reijnierse M, van der Helm- van Mil AHM. Is MRI of Use in Identifying Which Undifferentiated Arthritis Patients Will Develop RA? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-mri-of-use-in-identifying-which-undifferentiated-arthritis-patients-will-develop-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-mri-of-use-in-identifying-which-undifferentiated-arthritis-patients-will-develop-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology