ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1894

Is It Worth It to Include MRI of the Spine in the ASAS Classification Criteria for Axial Spondyloarthritis?

Manouk de Hooge1, Jean-Baptiste Pialat2, Antoine Feydy3, Monique Reijnierse1, Pascal Claudepierre4, Alain Saraux5, Maxime Dougados3 and Désirée van der Heijde1, 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France, 3Descartes University, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France, 4Henri Mondor Teaching Hospital, Creteil, France, 5CHU de la Cavale Blanche, Brest Cedex, France

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Inflammation, MRI, spine involvement and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases: X-ray, MRI and CT

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Spinal MRI lesions suggestive of axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are not included in the ASAS definition of a positive MRI, but do occur in the absence of affected sacroiliac joints (SIJ). It is unknown how often this happens and if it is useful to perform a MRI of the spine in patients (pts) with negative MRI-SIJ. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of a positive MRI-spine in pts with short symptom duration and a negative MRI-SIJ

Methods: Pts aged 18-50 with inflammatory back pain (IBP) (≥3 months, ≤3 years) from 25 participating centers in France were included in the DESIR-cohort (n=708). All available baseline MRIs of the spine were independently scored by 2 well-calibrated central readers who were blind to any other data. MRIs-SI were scored according to the ASAS definition1 (lesions highly suggestive of sacroiliitis plus ≥1 lesion on ≥2 consecutive slices or >1 lesion on 1 slice). Inflammatory lesions on MRI-spine suggestive of spondylitis were scored when visible on ≥2 consecutive slices and according to the ASAS consensus definition2 (≥3 lesions). In case of disagreement, an experienced radiologist served as adjudicator. MRI was considered positive if 2/3 readers agreed.

Results: All pts with MRI-spine and MRI-SIJ (n=650) were included in the analyses. There were 231 pts (35,5%) with a positive MRI-SIJ and 102 pts (15.7%) with a positive MRI-spine; 67 pts (10.3%) were positive for both MRI-SIJ and MRI-spine, 384 (59.1%) were negative for both; and 35 pts (5.4%) had a positive MRI-spine but a negative MRI-SI. Thirty of these were <45 years at symptom onset (entry criterion for ASAS axSpA criteria); 8 of these 30 pts fulfilled the modified New York criteria, 16 of these 30 pts fulfilled the clinical arm of the ASAS axSpA criteria and 6 pts did not fulfil the criteria. All these 6 pts were HLA-B27 negative. Therefore, if the MRI-spine would be considered to count for imaging for the ASAS criteria, 6 additional pts would have been classified and 16 pts would have fulfiled both the imaging and clinical arm; Two of the 5 pts with age >45 years at symptom onset fulfilled the mNY criteria.

Overall, only 25 pts (3.8%) had a pos MRI-spine without sacroiliitis on MRI or radiographs.

Conclusion: In 3.8% of IBP pts aged 18-50 ≥3 spinal inflammatory lesions suggestive of axSpA are found in absence of sacroiliitis on MRI or radiograph. Therefore the yield of including MRI-spine as additional imaging criterion in the ASAS axSpA classification criteria is considered unacceptably low.

References:1Rudwaleit ARD 2009;68:1520-7 2Hermann ARD 2012;71:1278-88


Disclosure:

M. de Hooge,
None;

J. B. Pialat,
None;

A. Feydy,
None;

M. Reijnierse,
None;

P. Claudepierre,
None;

A. Saraux,
None;

M. Dougados,
None;

D. van der Heijde,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-it-worth-it-to-include-mri-of-the-spine-in-the-asas-classification-criteria-for-axial-spondyloarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology