ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2936

Is Ankylosing Spondylitis a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Diseases, and How Does These Risks Compare to Those in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Johan Askling1, Lennart Jacobsson2 and Jonas Eriksson1, 1Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 2sahlrenska academy, gothenburg, Sweden

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, registries, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), risk and spondylarthropathy

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis V - Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

 

Background/Purpose Patients with RA are at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) diseases, including acute coronary syndromes (ACS), deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and cerebrovascular diseases. Evidence suggests that traditional CV risk factors alone do not account for the entire risk increase. Instead, RA disease activity has been proposed to be of critical importance. Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a different gender- and age-distribution, pathology, and phenotype yet often with a pronounced systemic inflammation. In contrast to the literature on CV risks in RA, data on CV risks in AS are less well studied, and because of the age/sex-differences between RA and AS, not directly comparable. The aim of this study was therefore to assess and compare CV risks, by CV phenotype, between prevalent patients with AS, RA and the general population, taking age and sex-differences into account.

Methods We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study based on register linkage of prospectively recorded data from the Swedish Patient, Death, and Population Registers 2006-2011. We identified one cohort of prevalent patients with RA (n=37,245), one with AS (N=5,358) and one with general population comparator subjects (n=185,153). These cohorts were followed through 2011 for first ever occurrence of ACS, DVT/PE, and stroke, respectively (individuals with a history of the outcome were excluded). Age- and sex-specific rates for each outcome were calculated; rates were then standardised to the age/sex-distribution of the AS cohort.

Results Crude rates were the lowest for AS. However, assuming all populations had the same age/sex distribution as the AS cohort, the rate for ACS was 30% higher among patients with AS, and 60% higher in patients with RA, than in the general population (Table). For stroke, the rate was 20% higher among patients with AS, and 30% higher in patients with RA, than in the general population. For thromboembolic events, the rate was 30% higher among patients with AS, and 80% higher in patients with RA, than in the general population.

Conclusion Prevalent patients with AS in a population-based cohort are at a 20-30% increased risk of CV events compared to the general population. Whilst increased, the level of increase is around half that seen in the corresponding age/gender groups in RA.

Table. Crude rates of ACS, stroke, and DVT/PE in AS, RA and general population cohorts, and the corresponding standardised rates using the AS population as standard.

 

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Stroke

Thromboembolic events

 

AS

RA

GenPop

AS

RA

GenPop

AS

RA

GenPop

N patients at risk

4914

31 769

143 713

5252

35 528

169 224

5225

35 220

169 615

N incident events

95

1266

3438

62

1056

3790

68

1016

2866

Rates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crude rates

4.7 (2.8-6.6)

10.0 (8.9-11.1)

5.8 (5.4-6.2)

2.9 (1.4-4.3)

7.5 (6.6-8.4)

5.5 (5.1-5.8)

3.2 (1.6-4.7)

7.3 (6.4-8.2)

4.2 (3.9-4.5)

Standardised rate

4.7 (2.8-6.6)

6.1 (5.3-7.0)

3.7 (3.4-4.0)

2.9 (1.4-4.3)

3.2 (2.6-3.8)

2.4 (2.2-2.7)

3.2 (1.6-4.7)

4.4 (3.7-5.1)

2.4 (2.2-2.6)


 


Disclosure:

J. Askling,

AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD,

2;

L. Jacobsson,

Pfizer, Abbvie, UCB,

5,

MSD,

2;

J. Eriksson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/is-ankylosing-spondylitis-a-risk-factor-for-cardiovascular-diseases-and-how-does-these-risks-compare-to-those-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology