ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 812

Intravenous Golimumab Inhibits Radiographic Progression and Maintains Clinical Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy: 1-Year Results of a Phase 3 Trial

Michael Weinblatt1, Clifton O. Bingham III2, Alan Mendelsohn3, Lenore Noonan4, Shihong Sheng5, Lilianne Kim6, Kim Hung6, Jiandong Lu6, Daniel Baker6 and Rene Westhovens7, 1Rheumatology & Immunology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 3Immunology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 4Immunology, Janssen Research & Development, LLC., Spring House, PA, 5Biostatistics, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 7Rheumatology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: radiography and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases I: Ultrasound and X-ray

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Intravenous Golimumab Inhibits Radiographic Progression and Maintains Clinical Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy: 1-Year Results of a Phase 3 Trial

Background/Purpose: To evaluate long-term clinical/radiographic efficacy of IV golimumab(GLM) 2mg/kg+MTX in pts with active RA despite MTX through wk 52.

Methods: Pts (n=592) with active RA (≥6/66 swollen joints, ≥6/68 tender joints, CRP≥1.0mg/dL, RF and/or anti-CCP positive at screening) despite ≥3months of MTX(15-25mg/wk) participated in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo(PBO)-controlled study. Pts were randomized to IV GLM 2mg/kg or PBO at wks0&4 and q8wks; all pts continued stable MTX. Pts randomized to PBO with <10% improvement in SJC+TJC at wk16 could early escape to IV GLM 2mg/kg (wks16&20, q8wks). All PBO pts received IV GLM 2mg/kg starting at wk24. Primary study endpoint was wk14 ACR20 response; major secondary clinical efficacy endpoints are reported through wk24. Radiographs of hands and feet were taken at baseline, wk24(wk16 for early escape) and wk52 and were scored by 2 independent readers and adjudicator (as needed) using modified vdHS score.
Results:  Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were comparable between grps. 93% of pts (553/592) continued through wk52. 39 pts d/c, mostly due to AEs(18 pts).GLM+MTX-tx pts demonstrated significantly (sig) less radiographic progression (total vdHS+subscores) vs PBO+MTX at wk24. Pts randomized to PBO+MTX who began GLM at wk16/24 demonstrated marked slowing of radiographic progression, to the same rate as pts randomized to GLM, from wk24 to wk52. At wk14, sig (p<0.001) larger proportions of GLM+MTX vs PBO+MTX pts achieved ACR20,  DAS28-CRP good/moderate , ACR50 and ACR70 responses and greater median improvement in HAQ score (0.50vs0.13). Through wk52, ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and DAS28 good/moderate response rates in pts randomized to GLM+MTX were 66%, 39%, 18%, and 81%, resp. Among pts who achieved ACR20, ACR50, ACR70 and DAS28 good/moderate responses by wk24, 82%, 72%, 61%, and 88%, resp, maintained response through wk52. Through wk52, all GLM-tx pts were followed for an average of 44wks. AEs and serious AEs occurred in 65% and 9%, resp, of GLM-tx pts (vs 43% and 4% at wk24). 1 case of TB and no serious opportunistic infections were reported through wk52. 1 pt receiving GLM+MTX (0.16%) died. Through wk52, the proportions of infusions and pts with infusion reactions were 0.7% and 3.6%, resp, (vs 1.1% and 3.5% at wk24).
Conclusion: GLM+MTX sig inhibited radiographic progression (for total vdHS and subscores) at wk24&52. Among PBO-tx pts who began GLM at wk16/wk24, marked slowing of radiographic progression, to the rate in pts randomized to GLM, was observed from week 24 to wk52. IV GLM+MTX sig improved and maintained RA signs/symptoms in pts with active RA despite ongoing MTX and continued to demonstrate an acceptable safety profile through wk52.

 

Table:    Summary of efficacy among randomized pts. Data shown are number (%) of pts or mean±SD / median (interquartile range).

 

Placebo + MTX (n=197)

GLM 2mg/kg + MTX (n=395)

CLINICAL EFFICACY

 

 

Week 14

 

 

ACR20*/ACR50 /ACR70

49 (24.9%)/17 (8.6%)/6 (3.0%)

231 (58.5%)/118 (29.9%)/49 (12.4%)***

DAS28-CRP moderate or good response

79 (40.1%)

321 (81.3%)***

Improvement from baseline in HAQ score

0.50 ± 0.58  / 0.13 (-0.13, 0.50)

0.19 ± 0.56  / 0.50 (0.13, 0.88)***

Week 24

 

 

ACR 20 response

62 (31.5%)

248 (62.8%)***

ACR 50 response

26 (13.2%)

142 (35.9%)***

ACR 70 response

8 (4.1%)

69 (17.5%)***

DAS28-CRP moderate or good response

88 (44.7%)

331 (83.8%)***

Improvement from baseline in HAQ score

0.21± 0.55 / 0.13 (-0.13, 0.50)

0.53 ± 0.64  / 0.50 (0.13, 0.88)***

Improvement in HAQ≥0.25 from baseline

89 (45.2%)

266 (67.3%)***

Week 52

 

 

ACR20 response

121 (61.4%)

260 (65.8%)

ACR50 response

62 (31.5%)

153 (38.7%)

ACR70 response                                                             

29 (14.7%)

72 (18.2%)

DAS28-CRP moderate or good response

149 (75.6%)

321 (81.3%)

Improvement from baseline in HAQ score

0.42 ± 0.59 / 0.38 (-1.1; 1.9)

0.51 ± 0.65 /  0.38 (-1.0; 2.5)

  Improvement in HAQ≥0.25 from baseline

123 (62.4%)

253 (64.1%)

RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION

 

 

Baseline Total vdHS

 

 

  Total score

50.26 ± 59.85 / 29.00 (8.50, 77.24)

47.59 ± 54.63 / 28.00 (9.00, 67.50)

  Erosion subscore

25.63 ± 32.38 / 13.00 (4.00, 36.00)

23.89 ± 29.00) / 13.50  (4.00, 32.00)

  Joint space narrowing subscore

24.63 ± 29.47 / 12.50 (4.00, 37.50)

23.70 ± 28.26 13.00 (3.00, 35.50)

Total vdHS Change from baseline at wk24

 

 

  Total score 

1.09 ± 3.19 / 0.00 (0.00, 1.49)

0.03 ± 1.90 / 0.00 (-0.50, 0.50)***

  Erosion subscore

0.53 ± 2.09 / 0.00 (0.00, 0.50)

-0.12 ± 1.15 / 0.00 (-0.50, 0.00)***

  Joint space narrowing subscore

0.56 ± 1.73 / 0.00 (0.00, 0.50)

0.14 ± 1.33 / (0.00, 0.00)**

Proportions of pts at wk24

 

 

 Progression based on smallest detectable change (SDC)

 

 

    Total (SDC=1.91)

38 (19.3%)

34 (8.6%)***

    Erosion (SDC=1.57)

21 (10.7%)

15 (3.8%)***

    Joint space narrowing (SDC=1.19)

34 (17.3%)

39 (9.9%)**

 Change in vdHS ≤ 0

113 (57.4%)

279 (70.6%)***

Total vdHS change from wk24-wk 52#

 

 

 

0.12 ± 2.44 / 0.00 (-0.50, 0.50)

0.15± 1.83 / 0.00 (-0.50, 0.50)

Total vdHS change from wk0-wk52

1.22± 3.98 / 0.00 (0.00, 1.50)

0.13 ± 3.11 / 0.00 (-0.50, 0.50)***

*Primary endpoint, **, ***p-value vs. placebo + MTX < 0.01, 0.001, respectively.

*Pts with missing total vdHS score at wk24 were excluded.

 

 


Disclosure:

M. Weinblatt,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

;

C. O. Bingham III,

Roche, Genentech, Biogen/IDEC,

2,

Roche, Genentech,

5;

A. Mendelsohn,

Janssen Research & Development, LLC,

3;

L. Noonan,

/janssen Research and Development, LLC,

3;

S. Sheng,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

3;

L. Kim,

Research and Development, LLC,

3;

K. Hung,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

3;

J. Lu,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

3;

D. Baker,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

3;

R. Westhovens,

Janssen Research and Development, LLC,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/intravenous-golimumab-inhibits-radiographic-progression-and-maintains-clinical-efficacy-and-safety-in-patients-with-active-rheumatoid-arthritis-despite-methotrexate-therapy-1-year-results-of-a-phase/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology