Background/Purpose: The GO-VIBRANT study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) golimumab (GLM) in adult patients (pts) with active PsA (biologic-naïve).

Methods:  GO-VIBRANT is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial. Biologic-naïve active PsA pts were randomized (1:1) to IV GLM 2mg/kg at weeks (wk) 0, 4, and every 8 wks thereafter or PBO at wks 0, 4, 12, and 20 with crossover to GLM at wk24. The primary endpoint was ACR20 response at wk14. Multiplicity-controlled endpoints included ACR50, ACR70, PASI 75, change from baseline in HAQ-DI, enthesitis, dactylitis; and ACR50 and change from baseline in total modified vdH-S (structural damage) score at wk24. Efficacy analyses were based on randomized treatment. Adverse events (AE) through wk24 are reported here.

Results: 480 pts were randomized (PBO: 239; GLM: 241). The study met its primary and all controlled secondary endpoints. At wk14, significantly greater proportions of GLM pts vs PBO achieved ACR20 (75.1% vs. 21.8%). Also, GLM treatment resulted in significant change from baseline HAQ-DI score (-0.60 vs. -0.12), ACR50 (43.6% vs. 6.3%), PASI 75 (59.2% vs. 13.6%), ACR70 (24.5% vs. 2.1%), and change from baseline in enthesitis and dactylitis scores (-1.8 vs. -0.8 and -7.8 vs. -2.8, respectively) (all p<0.001) at wk14.  At wk24, significantly greater proportions of GLM pts vs. PBO pts achieved ACR 50 (53.5% vs. 6.3%, p<0.001). At wk24, there was significantly less progression of structural damage for GLM pts vs PBO as measured by change from baseline in total modified vdH-S score (-0.36 vs. 1.95; p<0.001). ACR20 was significantly higher with GLM than PBO as early as wk2 (45.6% vs. 7.5%; p<0.001).  27.0% of GLM pts (vs. 4.2% PBO) achieved Minimal Disease Activity by wk14. In a post-hoc analysis, the number needed to treat for ACR20 at wk14 was 1.9 (Table). Through wk24, 46.3% of GLM pts and 40.6% of PBO pts had ≥1 AE; 2.9% vs. 3.3% of pts, respectively, had ≥1 serious AE. Two deaths and 2 malignancies, all in PBO pts and 1 demyelinating event in a GLM pt were reported. The most common type of AE was infection (20.0% of GLM pts vs. 13.8% of PBO pts). No opportunistic infection or tuberculosis was reported through wk24. The rate of infusion reactions in GLM-treated pts was low at <2%; none was serious or severe.

Conclusion: In pts with active PsA, IV GLM demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements of disease activity and physical function, skin psoriasis clearance, HRQoL, dactylitis and enthesitis, and inhibition of structural damage progression. GLM was well-tolerated through wk24; the safety profile was consistent with other anti-TNF therapies, including SC GLM.