ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1973

Intramuscular Versus Ultrasound Guided Peritendinous Glucocorticoid Injection for Tenosynovitis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis – a Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Study

Mads Ammitzbøll-Danielsen1,2, Mikkel Ostergaard2,3, Viktoria Fana4, Daniel Glinatsi2,5, Uffe Møller Døhn6, Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg7, Esperanza Naredo8 and Lene Terslev6, 1Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Copenhagen, Denmark, 2Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet , Glostrup, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Copenhagen, Denmark, 5Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark, 6Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Copenhagen, Denmark, 7Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón and Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: glucocorticoids, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Tendonitis/bursitis, treatment options and ultrasonography

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases II: Ultrasound in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:                                                              The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intramuscular versus ultrasound (US)-guided peritendinous glucocorticoid injection in providing disease control after 2, 4 and 12 weeks in rheumatoid arthritis(RA) patients with tenosynovitis.

Methods: Fifty RA patients with tenosynovitis were randomised into two double-blind groups: A. “intramuscular group”, receiving intramuscular injection of betamethasone and US-guided peritendinous isotonic saline injection and B. “peritendinous group” receiving saline intramuscularly and US-guided peritendinous betamethasone injection. All patients were in stable disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment prior to and during the study. Patients were excluded, and considered non-responders, if any treatments were altered during the follow-up period. “US tenosynovitis remission”, defined as US tenosynovitis grey-scale score ≤1 and colour Doppler score=0, was assessed at week 4 (primary outcome), and weeks 2 and 12, using non-responder imputation for missing data.  The tenosynovitis was assessed at baseline, 2,  4 and 12 weeks using the semi-quantitative scoring system for GS (0-3) and CD(0-3) as proposed by the OMERACT US group, clinical assessment and a patient reported pain tenosynovitis visual analogue scale (VAS tenosynovitis) from 0-100

Results: US tenosynovitis remission at week 4 was achieved in 25% (6/24) [95% confidence limits: 8%; 42%] in the “intramuscular group”, versus 64% (16/25) [45%; 83%] in the “peritendinous group” (Fisher exact test; p<0.01). Corresponding values for the “intramuscular group” versus the “peritendinous group” at 2 and 12 weeks were 21% [5%; 37%] versus 48% [28%; 68%] (p=0.07) and 8% (0%; 19%) versus 44% (24%; 63%) (p<0.01). Most US and clinical/patient-reported scores improved more in the “peritendinous group” at all follow up visits (see table 1).

Conclusion: In this randomised double-blind clinical trial, RA patients with tenosynovitis responded significantly better to US guided peritendinous glucocorticoid injection than to intramuscular glucocorticoid injection, both at 4 and 12 weeks follow up.


Disclosure: M. Ammitzbøll-Danielsen, None; M. Ostergaard, Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Celgene, Sanofi, Regeneron, Novartis, 2; V. Fana, None; D. Glinatsi, None; U. M. Døhn, None; L. M. Ørnbjerg, None; E. Naredo, None; L. Terslev, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ammitzbøll-Danielsen M, Ostergaard M, Fana V, Glinatsi D, Døhn UM, Ørnbjerg LM, Naredo E, Terslev L. Intramuscular Versus Ultrasound Guided Peritendinous Glucocorticoid Injection for Tenosynovitis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis – a Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/intramuscular-versus-ultrasound-guided-peritendinous-glucocorticoid-injection-for-tenosynovitis-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-randomised-double-blind-controlled-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/intramuscular-versus-ultrasound-guided-peritendinous-glucocorticoid-injection-for-tenosynovitis-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-randomised-double-blind-controlled-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology