ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 507

Inhibition of Joint Destruction in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Peficitinib in Combination with Methotrexate: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Japan

Tsutomu Takeuchi1, Yoshiya Tanaka 2, Mitsuhiro Rokuda 3, Hiroyuki Izutsu 3, Yuichiro Kaneko 3, Musashi Fukuda 3, Daisuke Kato 3 and Désirée van der Heijde 4, 1Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 2University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan, 3Astellas Pharma, Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 4Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, Janus kinase (JAK), joint destruction and randomized trials, rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Novel Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Peficitinib (PEF), a novel oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in Phase 3 studies of patients with RA (NCT02305849).1 We report the evaluation for suppression of joint destruction of PEF compared with placebo (PBO) in this study.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study was conducted in Japan. Patients with RA (< 10 years’ duration) and inadequate response (IR) to MTX were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive PEF 100 or 150 mg/day (PEF100 or PEF150) or PBO once daily, plus MTX. Patients receiving PBO were switched to PEF100 or PEF150 at Week (W) 28, or W12 for IR. Hand and foot X-rays were taken at baseline (BL), W12, 28 and 52. Mean change from BL (linear extrapolation) in van der Heijde modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at W28 in the full analysis set (FAS) was a primary endpoint, and was analyzed with rank analysis of covariance (rank ANCOVA) with treatment group as factor and BL rank mTSS as covariate in the primary analysis. Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy analysis were: 1. rank ANCOVA with LOCF imputation; 2. rank ANCOVA as observed data; 3. rank ANCOVA using the per protocol set-mTSS as the analysis set; 4. ANCOVA; 5. ANCOVA with multiple imputation method. The proportions of patients with no joint damage (mTSS < 0.5) and yearly progression of mTSS >5 were calculated. Subgroup analyses of mTSS for different demographic and BL characteristics were presented, in which interaction term with treatment group was significant at a two-sided significance level of 0.15 by ad hoc analysis.

Results: In total, 518 patients were included in the FAS: PBO n=170; PEF100 n=174; PEF150 n=174. BL demographics were similar between groups. The primary and secondary endpoint results from RAJ4 were met and have been described previously.1 Sensitivity analyses showed that the change in mTSS at W28 was similar to the primary analysis result, showing the robustness of the primary analysis (Table 1). At W28, a significantly greater proportion of patients achieved a change in mTSS of ≤0.5 for both PEF100 and PEF150 compared with PBO (67.1% and 72.6% vs 45.8%, respectively; p< 0.001 for both). This was maintained at W52 (64.0% and 68.9% vs 42.5%, respectively; p< 0.001 for both) (Table 2). The proportion of patients showing rapid radiographic progression (yearly progression of mTSS ≥5) was also significantly lower for both PEF100 and PEF150 compared with PBO (10.4% and 9.8% vs 35.3%, respectively; p< 0.001 for both: Table 2).

Selected parameters from the subgroup analysis showing significant results for their interaction with treatment group were age group, BL mTSS, BL DAS28-CRP, duration of RA, BL CRP, concomitant steroid at BL, prednisone dose at BL, and body weight at screening at a two-sided significance level of 0.15 by ad hoc analysis (Table 3).

Conclusion: Peficitinib 100 mg and 150 mg both demonstrated significant inhibition of joint destruction compared with PBO.

  1. T. Takeuchi et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018; 70 (Suppl 10): Abstract 888


Table 1_v1.0


Table 2_v1.0


Table 3_v1.0


Disclosure: T. Takeuchi, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie GK, 2, 9, Asahi Kasei, 2, Asahikasei, 2, Asahikasei Pharma Corp., 2, Astellas, 2, 8, 9, Astellas Pharma Inc, 2, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 5, 8, 9, Astra Zeneca, 2, AstraZeneca, 8, AYUMI, 2, 9, AYUMI Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2, BMS, 2, 8, Boehringer-ingelheim, 9, Bristol–Myers K.K., 9, Bristol-Myers, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 8, Chugai, 2, 8, 9, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., 2, Daiichi Sankyo, 2, 8, 9, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 2, Eisai, 2, 5, 8, 9, Eisai Co., Ltd., 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 8, Eli Lilly Japan, 9, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 9, GlaxoSmithKline K.K, 9, GSK, 8, Janssen, 2, 8, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K, 9, Mitsubishi Tanabe, 2, 9, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., 2, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp, 2, 8, 9, Nippon Kayaku, 2, Nipponkayaku, 2, 9, Nipponkayaku Co.Ltd., 2, Novartis, 2, 8, Novartis Pharma K.K, 2, 9, Novartis Pharma K.K., 2, Pfizer, 2, 8, Pfizer Japan, 2, 9, Pfizer Japan Inc., 2, Sanofi, 8, Sanofi K.K, 9, Shionogi & Co., 2, Shionogi & Co., LTD., 2, Taiho, 2, 8, 9, Taisho, 9, Taisho Toyama, 2, 8, Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation, 2, Takeda, 2, 8, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 2, Teijin, 2, 8, UCB, 8, 9, UCB Japan, 9; Y. Tanaka, Abbvie, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Asahi-kasei, 2, Asahi-Kasei, 2, Asahi-kasei, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, 2, Astellas, 8, Astellas Pharma, 9, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, Astellas, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Pfizer, Sanofic, UCB, YL Biologics, 8, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers, 2, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 8, Chugai, 2, 8, Daiichi-Sankyo, 2, 8, Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Sanofi, Abbvie, Pfizer, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, 8, Eisai, 2, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 8, Genzyme, 5, Glaxo-Smithkline, UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Takeda, Janssen, Asahi-kasei, 8, Janssen, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, 2, 8, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Takeda, Abbvie, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ono, MSD, Taisho-Toyama., 2, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai, Bristol-Myers, MSD, Astellas, Abbvie, Eisai, 2, Novartis, 8, Ono, 2, Pfizer, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 8, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, 8, Teijin, 8, UCB, 2, YL Biologics, 8; M. Rokuda, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; H. Izutsu, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; Y. Kaneko, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; M. Fukuda, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; D. Kato, Astellas Pharma, Inc., 3, 9; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 5, AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, 5, Amgen, 5, Astellas, 5, 9, Astellas Pharma, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, BMS, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 5, Daiichi, 5, 9, Daiichi Sankyo, 5, Director of Imaging Rheumatology, 6, Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv, 9, Eli Lilly, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Eli-Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, 5, GSK, 5, 8, Imaging Rheumatology bv, 9, Imaging Rheumatology BV, 9, Imaging Rheumatology bv., 9, Janssen, 5, 8, Janssen Pharmaceutica, 5, Merck, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 5, Regeneron, 5, 8, Rheumatology bv, 4, 9, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Takeda, 5, 8, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, 5, UCB, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Rokuda M, Izutsu H, Kaneko Y, Fukuda M, Kato D, van der Heijde D. Inhibition of Joint Destruction in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Peficitinib in Combination with Methotrexate: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Japan [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inhibition-of-joint-destruction-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-treated-with-peficitinib-in-combination-with-methotrexate-a-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-trial-in-japan/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inhibition-of-joint-destruction-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-treated-with-peficitinib-in-combination-with-methotrexate-a-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-trial-in-japan/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology