ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0920

Influence of Baseline Demographics on Improvements in Disease Activity Measures in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Receiving Upadacitinib: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis

Filip Van den Bosch1, Denis Poddubnyy2, Jayne Stigler3, Andrew Ostor4, Salvatore D'Angelo5, Victoria Navarro-Compán6, In-Ho Song3, Tianming Gao3, Fabiana Ganz3 and Lianne Gensler7, 1Dept. of Rheumatology - Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, Ghent, Belgium, 2Department of Rheumatology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, 3AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 4Monash University, Cabrini Hospital, and Emertius Research, Malvern, Australia, 5Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL) – Rheumatology Department of Lucania, “San Carlo” Hospital of Potenza and “Madonna delle Grazie” Hospital of Matera, Potenza, Italy, 6Rheumatology service, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain, 7Department of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), clinical trial

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster I: Axial Spondyloarthritis (0908–0939)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy and safety through 14 weeks in the SELECT-AXIS 1 study in biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naïve patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).1 The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of UPA 15 mg once daily (QD) in selected subgroups of patients with AS based on different baseline characteristics.

Methods: In SELECT-AXIS 1, patients were randomized to 14 weeks of blinded treatment with UPA 15 mg QD or placebo (PBO). This post hoc analysis evaluated the proportions of patients achieving ≥40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria (ASAS40), ≥50% improvement in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI50), and change from baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS[CRP]) at Week 14 across subgroups based on the following baseline patient characteristics: gender, age, body mass index, AS symptom duration, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging index, and human leukocyte antigen B27 status. For missing data, non-responder imputation analysis was used for ASAS40 and BASDAI50, and mixed model repeated measures analysis was used for ASDAS(CRP).

Results: Baseline disease characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups at randomization, as previously reported.1 ASAS40 and BASDAI50 response rates at Week 14 were numerically higher with UPA 15 mg versus PBO across the demographic and disease characteristic subgroups evaluated (Figure), including some subgroups with small sample sizes, such as patients with disease duration < 5 years and female patients. Improvements from baseline in ASDAS(CRP) were also consistently greater with UPA 15 mg versus PBO across the subgroups evaluated (Table).

Conclusion: Within subgroups evaluated, most patients with active AS receiving UPA 15 mg demonstrated greater improvements versus PBO in disease activity measures assessed by ASAS40, BASDAI50, and change from baseline in ASDAS(CRP). There was some evidence that gender, AS symptom duration, and baseline CRP levels seemed to influence outcomes, though results should be interpreted with caution due to small sample sizes for some subgroups.

Reference: 1. van der Heijde D, et al. Lancet 2019;394:2108–17.


Disclosures: F. Van den Bosch, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6; D. Poddubnyy, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6; J. Stigler, AbbVie, 3, 11; A. Ostor, AbbVie, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Janssen, 1, 2, UCB, 1, 2, Paradigm, 1, 2; S. D'Angelo, AbbVie, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; V. Navarro-Compán, Abbvie, 5, Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, UCB, 5, Janssen, 5; I. Song, AbbVie, 3, 11; T. Gao, AbbVie, 3, 11; F. Ganz, AbbVie, 3, 11; L. Gensler, Novartis, 5, UCB, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, Pfizer, 2, Pfizer, 5, Janssen, 2, UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Van den Bosch F, Poddubnyy D, Stigler J, Ostor A, D'Angelo S, Navarro-Compán V, Song I, Gao T, Ganz F, Gensler L. Influence of Baseline Demographics on Improvements in Disease Activity Measures in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Receiving Upadacitinib: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/influence-of-baseline-demographics-on-improvements-in-disease-activity-measures-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-receiving-upadacitinib-a-post-hoc-subgroup-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/influence-of-baseline-demographics-on-improvements-in-disease-activity-measures-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-receiving-upadacitinib-a-post-hoc-subgroup-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology