ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2603

Induction of Lupus Nephritisin in Real Situation: Cyclophosphamide or Mycophenolate Mofetil?

Gabriela Munhoz1, Maira Lacerda1, Michelle Lopes1, Eduardo Ferreira Borba1, Luciana Seguro2 and Eloisa Bonfa3, 1Rheumatology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Rheumatology Divison, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: cyclophosphamide, Lupus nephritis, mycophenolate mofetil and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapeutics and Clinical Trial Design

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (Euro-lupus) and Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are well established in lupus nephritis induction therapy, but there are few studies comparing both treatments. Our aim was to compare their efficacy and safety after 6-month induction therapy

Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of a single tertiary center. Patients with active lupus nephritis were treated with Euro-lupus (500mg, 15/15 days for 3 months, followed by MMF / azathioprine) or MMF (3g/day) as induction therapy. Clinical and laboratory data were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. Serious infectious were defined as infections requiring hospitalization and/or intravenous antibiotics. Exclusion: creatinine clearance <10mL/min and pregnancy.

Results: 40 patients received Euro-lupus and 70 patients received MMF. Euro-lupus and MMF groups were comparable in age (35.23 ± 10.32 vs. 37.43 ± 11.43 years, p=0.316), female gender (85.0 vs. 84.2%, p=1.0), white race (75.0 vs. 62.9%, p=0.212) and disease duration (5.65 ± 5.64 vs. 6.20 ± 6.44 years, p=0.653). Baseline laboratory parameters, SLEDAI and glucocorticoid therapy data are shown in table 1. The frequency of previous nephritis (70.0 ± 60.0%, p = 0.312), systolic blood pressure (BP) levels (p=0.597) and diastolic BP (p=0.217) were comparable in the two groups. Six-month laboratory parameters, SLEDAI and glucocorticoid therapy data are shown in table 2. After 6 months, Euro-lupus had a higher increase in C3 (p=0.038) and C4 (p=0.046) levels and a greater reduction in prednisone daily dose (-24.69 ± 14.72 vs. -18.43 ± 13.97 mg/day, p=0.029) than MMF. Euro-lupus presented higher frequency of serious infections (22.5 vs. 7.1%, p=0.034) than MMF.

Conclusion: Euro-lupus and MMF protocols were effective as induction therapy for active lupus nephritis with a comparable frequency of patients achieving the proteinuria target and in spite of worse baseline parameters in the former group. The higher frequency of serious infection in Euro-lupus group may be associated with more aggressive glucocorticoid regimen in these patients.

Table 1: Baseline laboratory parameters, SLEDAI and glucocorticoid therapy data of Euro-lupus vs. MMF

Euro-lupus

MMF

p

Creatinine, mg/dL

1.08 ± 0.82

0.85 ± 0.32

0,039*

Albumin, g/dL

3.20 ± 0.56

3.35 ± 0.59

0.243

Positive anti-dsDNA

31 (77.5%)

46 (65.7%)

0.279

C3, mg/dL

64.93 ± 29.59

72.27 ± 29.42

0.212

C4, mg/dL

10.10 ± 8.17

12.05 ± 9.17

0.267

24-hour proteinuria, g

2.46 ± 1.84

2.21 ± 1.39

0.434

Presence of hematuria

35 (87.5%)

43 (61.4%)

0.004*

SLEDAI

13.80 ± 5.64

11.69 ± 5.87

0.068

Prednisone dose, mg/day

44.00 ± 15.20

37.71 ± 16.37

0.049*

IV methylprednisolone

32 (80.0%)

42 (60.0%)

0.036*

Table 2: 6-month laboratory parameters, SLEDAI and glucocorticoid therapy data of Euro-lupus vs. MMF

Euro-lupus

MMF

p

Creatinine, mg/dL

0.89 ± 0.47

0.82 ± 0.34

0.342

Albumin, g/dL

3.88 ± 0.46

3.61 ± 0.74

0.070

Positive anti-dsDNA

18 (45.0%)

24 (34.3%)

0.310

C3, mg/dL

97.03 ± 26.03

91.32 ± 28.06

0.300

C4, mg/dL

19.42 ± 10.77

16.87 ± 9.09

0.190

24-hour proteinuria, g

0.64 ± 0.48

0.89 ± 1.19

0.216

24-hour proteinuria <0.8g/day

29 (72.5%)

47 (67,1%)

0.669

Presence of hematuria

13 (32.5%)

18 (25.7%)

0.511

SLEDAI

4.75 ± 3.44

4.51 ± 4.06

0.751

Prednisone dose, mg/day

19.31 ± 10.99

19.28 ± 13.08

0.991


Disclosure: G. Munhoz, None; M. Lacerda, None; M. Lopes, None; E. F. Borba, None; L. Seguro, None; E. Bonfa, None, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Munhoz G, Lacerda M, Lopes M, Borba EF, Seguro L, Bonfa E. Induction of Lupus Nephritisin in Real Situation: Cyclophosphamide or Mycophenolate Mofetil? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/induction-of-lupus-nephritisin-in-real-situation-cyclophosphamide-or-mycophenolate-mofetil/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/induction-of-lupus-nephritisin-in-real-situation-cyclophosphamide-or-mycophenolate-mofetil/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology