ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1059

Increased Risk of Atrioventricular Block, Atrial Fibrillation and Pacemaker Implantation in Ankylosing Spondylitis, Undifferentiated Spondylarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Compared to the General Population

Karin Bengtsson1, Helena Forsblad-d'Elia2, Elisabeth Lie1, Eva Klingberg1, Mats Dehlin1, Sofia Exarchou3, Ulf Lindström1, Johan Askling4 and Lennart TH Jacobsson1, 1Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2Departments of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Rheumatology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden, 3Section of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, 4Clinical Epidemiology Unit and Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), heart block, Psoriatic arthritis, risk and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Clinical Aspects and CoMorbidities

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:
There is a known association between conduction disturbances and ankylosing
spondylitis (AS). The risk of conduction disturbances in other phenotypes of spondylarthritis (SpA) is less
well studied. Studies have also indicated that SpA patients
have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is
both an expression of cardiac disease and a risk factor for stroke. Our
objective was to investigate the incidence of atrioventricular (AV) block and
AF in patients with AS, undifferentiated spondylarthritis
(uSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)
compared to each other and to general population (GP) comparators. We also
investigated the incidence of pacemaker implantation, a possible consequence of
severe arrhythmia.

Methods:
The study design was a prospective nationwide population-based cohort study,
including an AS cohort (n=6228), an uSpA cohort
(n=4795), a PsA cohort (n=16039) and a GP cohort
(n=269815). The cohorts were identified between 2001 and 2009 in the Swedish
patient and population registers. Patients with diagnoses for more than one SpA phenotype (n=1943) were excluded. The follow-up began
January 1, 2004 or at the date of first diagnosis thereafter in previously
undiagnosed cases and extended until the first outcome occurrence, death,
emigration or December 31, 2012, whichever occurred first. Subjects with a
history of each of the outcomes of interest were excluded from the analysis of
that outcome. Number of outcomes, person-years at risk, crude rates and age-
and sexstandardized rates to the GP cohort were
calculated for each outcome and cohort. Age- and sexadjusted
hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression
analysis.  

Results:
Age-and sexadjusted HRs for AV block, AF and
pacemaker implantation were significantly increased in both AS, uSpA and PsA compared to the GP
cohort. AS patients had not only a 2-fold increase in HRs for AV block and
pacemaker implantation compared to GP but also a significantly increased HR
compared to patients with PsA. The increased HR for
AV block was most pronounced for men in both the AS and uSpA
cohort, with an over 3-fold increase compared to GP comparators (Table).

 

AS

uSpA

PsA

GP

Atrioventricular block

 

 

 

 

Subjects at risk, n

6170

4773

15990

269125

Incident events, n

47

19

68

1329

Crude rates

1.1 (0.8-1.4)

0.6 (0.3-0.9)

0.6 (0.5-0.8)

0.6 (0.5-0.6)

Standardized rates*

1.1 (0.8-1.5)

1.2 (0.5-1.9)

0.7 (0.5-0.9)

na

Hazard ratio† (GP as ref.)

2.75 (2.05-3.69)

2.71 (1.72-4.27)

1.45 (1.14-1.86)

1

Hazard ratio† (PsA as ref.)

1.70 (1.16-2.49)

1.74 (1.03-2.92)

1

na

Male hazard ratio# (GP as ref.)

3.01 (2.21-4.11)

3.77 (2.29-6.20)

1.66 (1.23-2.23)

1

Female hazard ratio# (GP as ref.)

1.65 (0.68-4.00)

1.07 (0.34-3.33)

1.16 (0.75-1.78)

1

Atrial fibrillation

 

 

 

 

Subjects at risk, n

5983

4720

15568

263558

Incident events, n

204

82

625

11669

Crude rates

5.1 (4.4-5.8)

2.7 (2.1-3.3)

6.2 (5.7-6.7)

5.3 (5.2-5.4)

Standardized rates*

7.2 (5.8-8.6)

6.1 (4.4-7.9)

7.1 (6.5-7.7)

na

Hazard ratio† (GP as ref.)

1.43 (1.25-1.65)

1.26 (1.01-1.56)

1.49 (1.38-1.62)

1

Hazard ratio† (PsA as ref.)

0.99 (0.84-1.17)

0.83 (0.66-1.05)

1

na

Pacemaker implantation

 

 

 

 

Subjects at risk, n

6165

4769

15972

268806

Incident events, n

70

24

140

2429

Crude rates

1.7 (1.3-2.1)

0.8 (0.5-1.1)

1.3 (1.1-1.6)

1.1 (1.0-1.1)

Standardized rates*

2.1 (1.4-2.7)

1.5 (0.7-2.2)

1.5 (1.2-1.7)

na

Hazard ratio† (GP as ref.)

2.19 (1.73-2.79)

1.76 (1.17-2.63)

1.60 (1.35-1.90)

1

Hazard ratio† (PsA as ref.)

1.43 (1.07-1.93)

1.13 (0.73-1.76)

1

na

Rates are
presented as number of events/1000 person-years. All rates and hazard ratios
are calculated with 95 % confidence interval given in parenthesis. *Age- and sexadjusted with the GP cohort as reference. †Age- and sexadjusted. #Age-adjusted.

Conclusion:
Patients with AS, uSpA and PsA
had a significantly increased risk of AV block, AF and pacemaker implantation
compared to GP comparators. Male AS and uSpA patients
had a more than 3-fold increased risk of AV-block compared to GP. These results
demonstrate both similarities and differences in subtypes of SpA, which were partly sex-specific.


Disclosure: K. Bengtsson, None; H. Forsblad-d'Elia, None; E. Lie, None; E. Klingberg, None; M. Dehlin, None; S. Exarchou, None; U. Lindström, None; J. Askling, None; L. T. Jacobsson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bengtsson K, Forsblad-d'Elia H, Lie E, Klingberg E, Dehlin M, Exarchou S, Lindström U, Askling J, Jacobsson LT. Increased Risk of Atrioventricular Block, Atrial Fibrillation and Pacemaker Implantation in Ankylosing Spondylitis, Undifferentiated Spondylarthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Compared to the General Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increased-risk-of-atrioventricular-block-atrial-fibrillation-and-pacemaker-implantation-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-undifferentiated-spondylarthritis-and-psoriatic-arthritis-compared-to-the-general-po/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/increased-risk-of-atrioventricular-block-atrial-fibrillation-and-pacemaker-implantation-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-undifferentiated-spondylarthritis-and-psoriatic-arthritis-compared-to-the-general-po/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology