ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1234

Inconsistency in Uric Acid Reference Ranges Among 20 Top United States Hospitals: What Is “Normal”?

Brittany Frankel1, Grant Hughes 1 and Mark Wener 1, 1University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout and laboratory tests, hyperuricemia, uric acid

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Metabolic & Crystal Arthropathies Poster II: Clinical Trials & Basic Science

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Elevated serum uric acid (UA) concentration is associated with the urate crystal deposition disorders gout and nephrolithiasis, as well as hypertension, the metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Hyperuricemia is often defined as a serum urate level greater than 6.8 – 7.0 mg/dL, a physicochemical cutoff above which monosodium urate crystals precipitate in body fluids. Here, we determined whether leading United States (U.S.) hospitals used this physicochemical cutoff in their definition of the reference ranges for serum UA, and if the reference ranges were consistent across institutions.

Methods: The top 20 hospitals listed in the U.S. News & World Report Best Hospitals 2018-2019 rankings were queried. Data were obtained in May 2019 using either online publicly available information, or by telephone contact with the laboratory. Information about the type of assay used to measure serum uric acid was obtained. Reference ranges reported by each laboratory for adult males and females were obtained. If a given laboratory reported age-dependent reference ranges for a given sex, the median UA thresholds for that sex were used.

Results: All surveyed laboratories reported utilizing enzymatic (uricase) methods, which were obtained from a variety of instrument manufacturers. The median reported upper limit of the reference range (ULRR) for UA in males was 8.0 mg/dL (range 7.0 – 9.0 mg/dL). The median reported ULRR for females was 6.6 mg/dL (range 5.7 – 8.0 mg/dL). Among the 20 laboratories, 12 different upper limits were used for males, and 11 different upper limits were used for females. For adult males, 15% of hospitals reported an ULRR of 6.8 – 7.0, while 85% used an ULRR greater than 7.0, and 0% used an ULRR less than 6.8. For adult females, 15% of hospitals used an ULRR of 6.8 – 7.0, 30% used an ULRR greater than 7.0, and 55% used an ULRR less than 6.8. Only one laboratory used an age-adjusted reference range.

Conclusion: The upper limits of the reference ranges for serum UA reported by leading U.S. hospitals do not consistently align with the physicochemical definition of hyperuricemia. Additionally, there is considerable variability in the ULRR among surveyed hospitals. This likely reflects use of population-based distributions rather than physicochemical criteria to define hyperuricemia. Most surveyed hospitals used an ULRR for adult females which was lower than 6.8. Most hospitals surveyed used an ULRR for adult males which was higher than 7.0. This practice may result in under-recognition of clinically significant hyperuricemia and under-dosing of uric acid lowering agents in the treatment of gout in male patients.


Disclosure: B. Frankel, None; G. Hughes, None; M. Wener, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Frankel B, Hughes G, Wener M. Inconsistency in Uric Acid Reference Ranges Among 20 Top United States Hospitals: What Is “Normal”? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inconsistency-in-uric-acid-reference-ranges-among-20-top-united-states-hospitals-what-is-normal/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/inconsistency-in-uric-acid-reference-ranges-among-20-top-united-states-hospitals-what-is-normal/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology