ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1277

Improving Patient Appropriate Osteoporosis Screening with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scans in an Academic Internal Medicine Practice

Nithin Pusapati1, Rebecca Fitzpatrick1, Manya Gupta1 and Sonali Khandelwal2, 1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Rush University, Chicago, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Bone density, Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), education, medical, osteoporosis, Quality Indicators

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Measures and Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Nearly 53.6 million people in America have osteoporosis with increasing incidence each year (Brauer, JAMA 2009). Almost 25% of people with a hip fracture die within 1 year of the fracture (Wright, Journal Bone Mineral Research 2014). Currently, screening for osteoporosis is recommended for women over the age of 65 or over 50 with noted risk factors. Bisphosphonate therapy has been shown to reduce both fracture risk and mortality in people with osteoporosis. (Brauer, JAMA 2009). Primary care settings are often the first line opportunity to provide appropriate screening measures to adult patients. Our project aims to both identify and improve the frequency of osteoporosis screening by providers in an Internal Medicine practice, as well as to increase comfort with treatment.

Methods: An initial survey was sent to a large urban academic practice of Internal Medicine residents and attendings to determine current practice and attitudes toward osteoporosis screening and management. After the initial survey, a lecture on osteoporosis screening indications, diagnosis, and general management was delivered to physicians in the same practice. A repeat survey was sent to assess the effectiveness of the educational material. Qualitative statistics were used to analyze the data. A p-value of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.

Results: A total of 51 providers completed the initial survey. Their demographics and responses to osteoporosis screening and management are in Table 1. Roughly half of providers “rarely/never” discussed osteoporosis screening with patients. Nearly 67% of providers stated that they “usually/always” order osteoporosis screening; 74% of providers knew the indications for osteoporosis screening. A majority (82%) of providers, thought that screening would change their management. Forty-six percent of providers were comfortable with osteoporosis management. After the educational material/intervention, another survey was sent and 24 providers responded, with results noted in Table 2. After the education, 56% of providers were likely to discuss osteoporosis screening (p=0.7). 96% stated they knew the indications for screening (p=0.03). There was also a large increase of providers who felt comfortable with osteoporosis management (60.9%) post-lecture (p=0.2).

Conclusion: In an academic Internal Medicine practice of physicians, a dedicated lecture on osteoporosis improved both knowledge about osteoporosis screening indications, diagnosis and management, and provider willingness to discuss osteoporosis screening with their patients. This project demonstrated that, at minimum, a traditional lecture format reliably improved provider knowledge of screening guidelines and should be incorporated into medical educational curricula. A more structured, targeted Rheumatology focused educational series may be even more impactful. As such, further research is necessary to determine if these interventions translate to improved bone health outcomes and if additional educational interventions can continue to increase Internists’ comfort with the management of bone loss.

Supporting image 1

Table 1 notes the results of the survey sent to Internal Medicine residents and attendings regarding their practice of osteoporosis screening and management prior to the educational intervention.

Supporting image 2

Table 2 notes the results of the survey sent to Internal Medicine residents and attendings regarding their practice of osteoporosis screening and management after the educational intervention.


Disclosures: N. Pusapati, None; R. Fitzpatrick, None; M. Gupta, None; S. Khandelwal, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pusapati N, Fitzpatrick R, Gupta M, Khandelwal S. Improving Patient Appropriate Osteoporosis Screening with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scans in an Academic Internal Medicine Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-patient-appropriate-osteoporosis-screening-with-dual-energy-x-ray-absorptiometry-scans-in-an-academic-internal-medicine-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-patient-appropriate-osteoporosis-screening-with-dual-energy-x-ray-absorptiometry-scans-in-an-academic-internal-medicine-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology