ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2310

Improving Access to Health Care in Rheumatology Practices through Initiation of an Outpatient Urgent Care Clinic, a Paradigm Shift

Ruchi Jain, Meenakshi Jolly, Theodore Pincus, Isabel Castrejón, Annie Huang and Joel A. Block, Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Access to care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Urgent care clinics are built into some primary care practices, but no reports are available of urgent care clinics in rheumatology settings.  Many rheumatologists currently reserve slots in their schedules to accommodate patients with urgent needs.  However, this practice may be inadequate as the slots may become filled by waitlisted, follow-up, or new patients, particularly in academic practices where providers may see patients only a few days per week.  A survey of patients with rheumatic diseases indicated that 50% reported inadequate provider access for urgent concerns, which was greater among patients of providers whose clinical activities involved fewer rather than 5 days per week.  We studied patients seen at an academic rheumatology urgent care clinic to analyze possible reduction in emergency room (ER) visits, and possible improved patient confidence that timely care by their rheumatologist is available.

Methods: A weekly urgent care clinic was initiated for established patients under care at an academic rheumatology setting who had issues that could not wait until their next appointment, as well as for recently discharged inpatients with need of early outpatient follow up.  A control group of 100 patients seen sequentially in routine care was identified, and compared to the urgent care group using t tests and chi square tests.  Each patient in the control and urgent care group completed a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) at each visit as part of routine care, with scores for physical function, pain, patient global assessment, RAPID3  (routine assessment of patient index data), and demographic data.  Each physician scored a contemporaneous physician global assessment.  An additional survey for urgent care clinic patients queried if patients would have gone to the ER if not seen today (Yes or No) and the level of the patients’ confidence that future urgent concerns would be met (0=no confidence – 10=great confidence).

Results: Demographics of the 42 patients and 100 controls are in Table 1. Those seen in the urgent care clinic were older, less likely to work full time, and more likely to have osteoarthritis than the controls.  MDHAQ scores were significantly higher in the urgent care clinic vs controls (Table 1).  61% of urgent care patients reported that they would have gone to the ER if the urgent care clinic were not available, and mean confidence score of patients in the urgent care clinic group was 9.75 on a 0-10 scale.

 

Control Group

N=100

Urgent Care Group

N=42

P

Female, n (%)

81 (81.0%)

34 (80.9%)

0.99

Age, mean (SD)

51.8 (16.8)

59.9 (15.8)

0.01

Ethnicity, n (%)

Caucasian

Afro-American

Hispanic

Others

–

48 (48%)

36 (36%)

8 (8%)

8 (8%)

–

13 (31.7%)

22 (53%)

5 (12.2%)

2 (3.1%)

–

0.11

Education, mean (SD)

14.6 (2.9)

14.1 (2.7)

0.45

Work Full time, n (%)

34 (40%)

5 (19%)

0.05

Diagnosis, n (%):

RA

OA

SLE

Crystal Diseases

Other Diseases

–

29 (29%)

9 (9%)

16 (16%)

3 (3%)

43 (43%)

–

9 (21.9%)

10 (24.4%)

2 (4.8%)

5 (5.7%)

16 (43.2%)

–

0.037

Physician Global (0-10), mean (SD)

3.6 (2.2)

5.4 (1.0)

<0.001

Patient Global (0-10) , mean (SD)

4.3 (2.9)

7.2 (1.6)

<0.001

PAIN (0-10) , mean (SD)

4.6 (3.3)

7.3 (2.2)

<0.001

FUNCTION (0-10) , mean (SD)

2.3 (2.2)

4.5 (2.9)

<0.001

RAPID3 (0-30) , mean (SD)

10.9 (7.4)

17.7 (4.3)

<0.001

Anxiety (0-3.3)

0.57 (0.77)

0.91 (0.16)

0.03

Depression (0-3.3)

0.44 (0.73)

0.82 (0.97)

0.018

All scores are mean (standard deviation=SD)

Conclusion: Patients seen in the urgent care clinic had poorer clinical status than control patients, with higher patient and physician scores.  61% would have gone to the ER had they not been seen in the urgent care clinic.  These patients also expressed high confidence that timely access would be available in the future. Improved patient access for urgent needs may be met by a dedicated urgent care clinic.


Disclosure:

R. Jain,
None;

M. Jolly,
None;

T. Pincus,
None;

I. Castrejón,
None;

A. Huang,
None;

J. A. Block,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-access-to-health-care-in-rheumatology-practices-through-initiation-of-an-outpatient-urgent-care-clinic-a-paradigm-shift/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology