ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0564

Improvements in Patient Reported Outcomes Through 24 Weeks of Guselkumab Treatment in Participants with Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Inadequate Response and/or Intolerance to One Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor

Alice Gottlieb1, Joseph F Merola2, Philip J. Mease3, Christopher Ritchlin4, Jose U. Scher5, Kimberly Parnell Lafferty6, Daphne Chan7, Soumya Chakravarty8, Wayne Langholff9, Yanli Wang9, Olivia Choi, MD, PhD, FAAD7, Yevgeniy Krol10 and Alexis Ogdie11, 1Department of Dermatology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 2Department of Dermatology and Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 3Department of Rheumatology, Providence-Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4University of Rochester Medical Center, Canandaigua, NY, 5New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 6Johnson & Johnson, Dermatology, Horsham, PA, 7Johnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, USA, Horsham, PA, 8Johnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, USA; Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Villanova, PA, 9Johnson & Johnson, Biostatistics, Spring House, PA, 10Johnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, 11University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0554–0592) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), a fully human IL-23p19-subunit inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in significantly improving psoriatic arthritis (PsA) signs and symptoms in participants (pts) with active PsA irrespective of prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) experience. SOLSTICE is an ongoing Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GUS on signs and symptoms of PsA disease specific patient reported outcomes (PROs), with two maintenance dosing regimens of 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and Q8W, in a dedicated PsA pt population who were inadequate responders (IR [inadequate efficacy and/or intolerance]) to one prior TNFi.

Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with active PsA (≥3 swollen joints; ≥3 tender joints; C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥0.3 mg/dL) who were TNFi-IR to one prior TNFi were eligible to be enrolled from 128 sites across 12 countries. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg Q4W; GUS at Week (W)0, W4, then Q8W; or placebo (PBO) with crossover to GUS 100 mg Q4W at W24. The major secondary PRO endpoints at W24 were mean change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI; physical function), 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS; overall Health-related Quality of Life [HRQoL]), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT- F) scores. Proportions of pts achieving clinically meaningful improvements for HAQ-DI response (improvement ≥0.35) and FACIT-F response (improvement ≥4) were prespecified endpoints, but not multiplicity-controlled.

Results: A total of 451 participants (Q4W n=150, Q8W n=151, PBO n=150) were included in the analysis. On average, pts had moderate to severe impairment of physical function at baseline that is consistent with an active PsA population (Table). At W24, greater improvements in HAQ-DI, SF-36 PCS, and FACIT-F scores were observed in both treatment groups vs the PBO group (Table). A significantly greater reduction from baseline in HAQ-DI score was observed at W24 in the Q4W (-0.42, p=0.003) and Q8W (-0.40, p=0.008) groups, vs PBO (-0.24) group (Figure 1a). Furthermore, significantly greater improvement from baseline was observed in the Q4W and Q8W groups vs PBO group for SF-36 PCS (7.0 and 7.0 vs 3.7, respectively) and FACIT-F (8.4 and 7.8 vs 3.9, respectively); p< 0.001 for both (Figure 1b). Among pts with a baseline score of ≥0.35, the proportion of pts who achieved HAQ-DI response at W24 in the Q4W and Q8W groups vs PBO group were, 55.8% (p< 0.001) and 52.8% (p=0.003) vs 35.4%, respectively (Figure 2a). Greater proportions of pts achieved clinically meaningful improvement in FACIT-F response in the Q4W (63.0%) and Q8W (63.9%) groups (p< 0.001 for both) vs PBO (38.0%) group (Figure 2b).

Conclusion: In the TNFi-IR PsA population from SOLSTICE, both GUS dosing regimens demonstrated superior efficacy vs PBO for improving physical function, overall HRQoL, and fatigue at W24. These data reinforce the effectiveness of GUS irrespective of dosing regimen in the TNFi-IR population across multi-domain measures of efficacy and PROs.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: A. Gottlieb: Amgen, 1, 2, 6, Avalo Therapeutics, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 6, Highlights Therapeutics, 1, 2, 6, MoonLake, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 6, Sanofi, 1, 2, 6, Sun Pharma, 1, 2, 6, Takeda, 1, 2, 6, Teva, 1, 2, 6, UCB, 1, 2, 5, 6, Xbiotech, 1, 2, 6; J. Merola: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Dermavant, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, LEO Pharma, 2, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi-Regeneron, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 5, UCB, 2, 5; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, Century, 2, Cullinan, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Inmagene, 2, J&J Innovative Medicine, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sana, 5, Spyre, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; C. Ritchlin: AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, MoonLake Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Solara, 2, UCB, 2; J. Scher: Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2; K. Parnell Lafferty: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; D. Chan: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; S. Chakravarty: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; W. Langholff: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; Y. Wang: IQVIA, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 12, Statistical support funded by Johnson & Johnson; O. Choi, MD, PhD, FAAD: Apogee Therapeutics Inc., 3, Johnson & Johnson, 11, 12, Employee of Johnson & Johnson at the time study was conducted; Y. Krol: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 1, 2, 5, Amgen, 1, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 2, Celgene, 1, 2, CorEvitas, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, Gilead, 1, 2, Glaxo Smith Klein, 1, 2, Johnson & Johnson, 1, 2, National Psoriasis Foundation, 5, NIAMS, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, Rheumatology Research Foundation, 5, UCB, 1, 2, University of Pennsylvania, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gottlieb A, Merola J, Mease P, Ritchlin C, Scher J, Parnell Lafferty K, Chan D, Chakravarty S, Langholff W, Wang Y, Choi, MD, PhD, FAAD O, Krol Y, Ogdie A. Improvements in Patient Reported Outcomes Through 24 Weeks of Guselkumab Treatment in Participants with Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Inadequate Response and/or Intolerance to One Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvements-in-patient-reported-outcomes-through-24-weeks-of-guselkumab-treatment-in-participants-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-and-inadequate-response-and-or-intolerance-to-one-prior-tumor-necrosi/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvements-in-patient-reported-outcomes-through-24-weeks-of-guselkumab-treatment-in-participants-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-and-inadequate-response-and-or-intolerance-to-one-prior-tumor-necrosi/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology