ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1493

Improvement in the Signs and Symptoms of Psoriatic Arthritis with Ixekizumab Compared to Adalimumab in Patient Subgroups Defined by Baseline Disease Characteristics

Joseph Merola1, Aubrey Trevelin Sprabery 2, Amanda Gellett 2, Chen-Yen Lin 2 and Dennis McGonagle 3, 1Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Enthesitis, IL-17 and psoriasis, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Multiple biologic DMARD (bDMARD) treatments are available for PsA, but there is limited research that compares the safety and efficacy of these treatments. Head-to-head (H2H) studies may improve the strength of PsA treatment guidelines and provide valuable guidance to physicians in selecting optimal treatment.1 SPIRIT-H2H, the first completed H2H superiority study in active PsA, showed superiority of ixekizumab (IXE), an IL-17A antagonist, over adalimumab (ADA), a TNF inhibitor, on a combined endpoint at Week 24.2 Here we report the Week 24 efficacy of IXE and ADA in subgroups defined by baseline disease characteristics.

Methods: SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551) is a 52-week, multicenter, open-label, blinded assessor study in bDMARD-naïve patients who were inadequate responders to conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) with active PsA (≥3 tender joint count [TJC] and ≥3 swollen joint count [SJC]) and plaque psoriasis (body surface area [BSA] ≥3%). All patients met Classification Criteria for PsA. Patients were randomized 1:1 to IXE or ADA on-label dosing based on presence/absence of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (BSA ≥10% + Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥12 + static Physician Global Assessment [sPGA] ≥3). A blinded assessor measured TJC, SJC, enthesitis, dactylitis, PASI, sPGA, BSA, and fingernail psoriasis. This post hoc subgroup analysis assessed efficacy in patients with baseline enthesitis (presence/absence), dactylitis (presence/absence), fingernail psoriasis (presence/absence), BSA (10% cutoff), and CRP (6 mg/L cutoff). Week 24 outcomes were compared between IXE and ADA at ACR20/50/70 responses and minimal disease activity (MDA). Missing data were imputed by nonresponder imputation. While the post hoc analysis was not controlled for multiplicity, all comparisons were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test.

Results: The Table summarizes Week 24 efficacy outcomes by subgroup. There were no statistical differences between IXE and ADA at ACR20 and ACR50 response rates across all of the examined subgroups. ACR70 responses were comparable across subgroups, except significantly more IXE-treated patients with baseline fingernail psoriasis achieved ACR70 than ADA-treated patients (p=.02). Significantly more IXE- than ADA-treated patients achieved MDA-6 in subgroups with baseline enthesitis (p=.002), without dactylitis (p=.015), with fingernail psoriasis (p< .001), CRP≤6 mg/L (p=.046), and BSA ≥10% (p=.01). All other subgroups analyzed demonstrated comparable efficacy on IXE and ADA.
A limitation of this analysis is that it was completed post hoc, not controlled for multiplicity, and patients were not stratified by these baseline disease characteristics.

Conclusion: IXE and ADA are associated with comparable efficacy in the signs and symptoms of PsA in patient subgroups defined by baseline enthesitis, dactylitis, fingernail psoriasis, BSA, and CRP.

References:

  1. Singh JA, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):5-32.
  2. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT03151551?term=spirit-h2h&rank=1


Table

Table: Efficacy Outcomes at Week 24 in patient subgroups defined by baseline disease characteristics -NRI-


Disclosure: J. Merola, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Aclaris, 2, 5, Almirall, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Biogen Idec, 2, 5, Biogen IDEC, 5, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard, 3, Burrage Capital Management Boston Advisory Board, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, Dermavant, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Leo Pharma, 2, 5, Lilly, 5, Merck, 5, Merck Research Laboratories, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 5, Samumed, 2, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sanofi Regeneron, 2, 5, Science 37, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; A. Trevelin Sprabery, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; A. Gellett, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; C. Lin, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; D. McGonagle, AbbVie, 9, Abbvie, 2, 8, BMS, 9, Celgene, 2, 8, 9, Janssen, 2, 8, Johnson & Johnson, 9, Lilly, 2, 8, MSD, 9, Novartis, 2, 8, 9, Pfizer, 2, 8, 9, UCB, 8, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Merola J, Trevelin Sprabery A, Gellett A, Lin C, McGonagle D. Improvement in the Signs and Symptoms of Psoriatic Arthritis with Ixekizumab Compared to Adalimumab in Patient Subgroups Defined by Baseline Disease Characteristics [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvement-in-the-signs-and-symptoms-of-psoriatic-arthritis-with-ixekizumab-compared-to-adalimumab-in-patient-subgroups-defined-by-baseline-disease-characteristics/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improvement-in-the-signs-and-symptoms-of-psoriatic-arthritis-with-ixekizumab-compared-to-adalimumab-in-patient-subgroups-defined-by-baseline-disease-characteristics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology