ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0148

Implementation of an Interprofessional Safety Check to Screen for Latent Tuberculosis at an Academic Tertiary Referral Rheumatology Clinic Increased Screening Rates Compared to Historical Levels

Meera Subash, Hailyn Nielsen, Neda Noori Nassr, Diana Ung and Andrew Gross, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Health Services Research, Quality Indicators, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 6, 2021

Title: Health Services Research Poster I: Lupus, Inflammatory Arthritis, & More (0128–0148)

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Certain disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) increase the risk of reactivation of latent tuberculosis (TB). While screening for latent TB prior to initiation of these DMARDs is recommended for a most patients, low rates of screening have been reported in national rheumatology registry data3. A prior study conducted in our rheumatology clinic at an academic tertiary referral center suggested that only 63% of eligible patients from 2013-2017 were screened for latent TB prior to DMARD initiation. We highlight our approach of implementing a pharmacy-integrated safety check to capture this key safety measure.

Methods: Analysis 1: In October of 2019, we implemented a new pharmacy-integrated workflow in which clinicians prescribe new oral or injectable DMARDs to the university specialty pharmacy which reviews cases for adequate TB screening. DMARD prescriptions were filled or routed to patients’ contracted specialty pharmacies only once adequate TB screening was completed unless the clinician specified otherwise. Analysis 2: Using SQL to extract data from the electronic health record (EHR) for the calendar year 2020, we generated a list of patients eligible for TB screening which served as the denominator in calculating our TB screening rate. First, all qualifying DMARD prescriptions were identified. We excluded refills, patients switching between DMARDs, and patients with a history of TB using historic prescription data and information from the past medical history of problem list. Adequately screened cases (numerator) had a result for an interferon gamma release assay or purified protein derivative test within 365 days prior to or 60 days after the DMARD prescription start date We validated all inadequately screened cases by manual chart review.

Results: Analysis 1: In 2020, 97 new qualifying DMARD prescriptions were routed through our workflow. In three cases, the medication was not started due to patient or clinician preference or lack of insurance coverage. These were excluded from the denominator. In two instances, the clinician overrode the requirement for TB screening within 365 days as it had been performed with the prior 18 months. Analysis 2: EHR data extraction identified 159 cases in 2020 eligible for TB screening, and 130 were screened adequately for a TB screening rate of 82%. Differences in numbers of eligible patients in EHR data versus through the workflow were analyzed via manual chart review. Chart review also suggested reasons for inadequate screening including prior TB screening outside of the defined timeframe, treatment hiatus, and prescription of an infusion.

Conclusion: Our intervention was associated with a significant improvement of 19% in our clinic’s TB screening rate compared to historic rates. Reviewing EHR data identified additional reasons for missed screening. These reasons for missed screening may inform future process improvement cycles related to capturing this key safety measure.


Disclosures: M. Subash, None; H. Nielsen, None; N. Noori Nassr, None; D. Ung, None; A. Gross, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Subash M, Nielsen H, Noori Nassr N, Ung D, Gross A. Implementation of an Interprofessional Safety Check to Screen for Latent Tuberculosis at an Academic Tertiary Referral Rheumatology Clinic Increased Screening Rates Compared to Historical Levels [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/implementation-of-an-interprofessional-safety-check-to-screen-for-latent-tuberculosis-at-an-academic-tertiary-referral-rheumatology-clinic-increased-screening-rates-compared-to-historical-levels/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/implementation-of-an-interprofessional-safety-check-to-screen-for-latent-tuberculosis-at-an-academic-tertiary-referral-rheumatology-clinic-increased-screening-rates-compared-to-historical-levels/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology