ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1040

Impact of Ultrasound Limitation to Assess Aortitis in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: Comparative Study with FDG-PET/CT

Juan Molina-Collada1, Isabel Castrejon2, Irene Monjo3, Elisa Fernandez-Fernandez4, Gabriela Torres5, JULIA MARTINEZ BARRIO6, Jose María Alvaro-Gracias7 and Eugenio De Miguel5, 1Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, 3University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 4La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 5Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 6Rheumatology, Gregorio Marañon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, 7Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, Imaging, Ultrasound, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: (1033–1051) Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Aortitis is a serious potential complication of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) and may lead to dilation, aneurysms or dissection. Since ultrasound (US) has limited access to detect aortitis, comparative studies with other imaging modalities to determine the clinical impact of this limitation and the specific situations warranting their use are needed. Our aim was to determine the impact of US intrinsic limitation to assess aortitis vs FDG-PET/CT in patients with US-proven GCA and to identify factors associated with aortic involvement.

Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients referred to US fast-track clinics at two academic centres over a four-year period. Only patients with GCA confirmed by US were included. Temporal (TA) and extracranial arteries US were performed at baseline. FDG-PET/CT was performed according to clinician’s criteria. An FDG artery uptake at the aorta higher than liver uptake was considered positive for aortitis.

Results: Seventy-two of 186 patients with US-proven GCA underwent an FDG-PET/CT; 29 (40.3%) had a positive FDG-PET/CT and 24 (33.3%) presented aortitis. Only 6 (20.7%) patients with positive FDG-PET/CT had negative US findings of large vessel (LV)-GCA. Among patients with aortitis in FDG-PET/CT, only 2 (8.3%) had negative US findings of LV-GCA. Patients with aortitis were younger (68.9 vs 81;p< 0.001), more frequently females (79.2% vs 39.6%;p=0.002) and had higher platelets count (413.4 vs 311.1;p=0014) (Table 1). Patients with aortitis presented positive TA US less frequently (41.7% vs 83.3%;p< 0.001), but more LV US involvement (91.7% vs 41.7%; p< 0.001) versus patients without aortitis (Table 2). None of the patients with aortitis exhibited visual symptoms (0% vs31.2%;p=0.001).

Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT can detect aortitis in 1 out of every 3 patients with US-proven GCA. However, a negative US examination for LV-GCA suggests a low risk of aortitis. Younger and female GCA patients with thrombocytosis, absence of visual manifestations and LV-GCA on US may more frequently present aortitis by FDG-PET/CT.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Clinical, laboratory and histology findings of patients with and without aortic involvement.

Supporting image 2

Table 2. US patterns of vascular involvement in patients with or without aortitis in FDG-PET/CT.


Disclosures: J. Molina-Collada: None; I. Castrejon: Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 6, Galapagos, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 1, 6, Lilly, 1, 6, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 6; I. Monjo: Amgen, 6, Gedeon Richter, 6, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 6, Roche, 6, UCB, 6; E. Fernandez-Fernandez: None; G. Torres: None; J. MARTINEZ BARRIO: None; J. Alvaro-Gracias: Abbvie, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, GSK, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; E. De Miguel: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Molina-Collada J, Castrejon I, Monjo I, Fernandez-Fernandez E, Torres G, MARTINEZ BARRIO J, Alvaro-Gracias J, De Miguel E. Impact of Ultrasound Limitation to Assess Aortitis in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: Comparative Study with FDG-PET/CT [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-ultrasound-limitation-to-assess-aortitis-in-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-comparative-study-with-fdg-pet-ct/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-ultrasound-limitation-to-assess-aortitis-in-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-comparative-study-with-fdg-pet-ct/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology