ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 735

Impact of Time Since Diagnosis, Age, and Number of Prior Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Response to Adalimumab (HUMIRA) in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Joachim Sieper1, Atul A. Deodhar2, Maja Hojnik3, Ying Zhang4 and Maxime Dougados5, 1Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 3AbbVie, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 4AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, 5René Descartes University and Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Adalimumab, Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Axial spondyloarthritis and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster I: Axial and Peripheral Spondyloarthritis – Clinical Aspects, Imaging and Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients (pts) were found to respond better to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) if treated early in the disease course. The objective of this analysis was to examine the impact of time since diagnosis, age, and number of prior NSAIDs as surrogates for disease duration on clinical outcomes in AS pts treated with adalimumab (ADA) in ATLAS trial.

Methods:  ATLAS1,2 was a phase III randomized double-blind trial comparing safety and efficacy of ADA with placebo (PBO) in pts with active AS who failed NSAID therapy. In this post hoc analysis, pts were categorized by baseline (BL) (1) time since diagnosis (<2 vs ≥2, <5 vs ≥5, and <10 vs ≥10 years [yrs]), (2) age (<35, 35 – 45, and >45 yrs), and (3) number of prior NSAIDs (≤ 2 vs >2). The effect of time since diagnosis, age and number of prior NSAIDs on AS outcome measures at week (wk) 12 was determined in pts who received at least one dose of ADA during the PBO-controlled period or open label extension and received prior NSAID(s) at BL.

Results:  Of the 301 pts included in this analysis, a majority of them had ≥5 yrs since AS diagnosis (205 [68.1%]), were <45 yrs of age (182 [60.5%]), and had ≤2 prior NSAIDs (170 [56.5%]). Pts with shorter time since diagnosis were generally younger, while those with longer time since diagnosis were more frequently HLA-B27+. There were more men than women across all subcategories. CRP was numerically higher in patients with ≤2 prior NSAIDs. The BL disease activity measures were however numerically similar across most categories (Table 1). At wk 12, the proportions of pts achieving ASAS20 and ASAS40 responses were numerically higher and mean decreases in BASDAI and BASFI scores from baseline larger in subcategories with shorter time since diagnosis, lower age, and fewer prior NSAIDs (Table 2). The differences in the clinical outcomes were significant between <35 and >45 yrs age categories (ASAS20: P<0.001; ASAS40: P=0.003; BASDAI: P=0.002; BASFI: P=0.012).

Conclusion:  Shorter time since diagnosis, younger age, and lower number of prior NSAIDs resulted in numerically greater clinical responses and improvements in disease activity and functionality following ADA treatment in pts with AS. The younger age (<35 yrs) had the largest positive impact on the clinical outcomes as compared with higher age (>45 yrs), suggesting its closest association with the actual disease duration. Overall, the results support the need for early effective treatment intervention in AS pts to improve clinical outcomes. References:

  1. Van der Heijde, D. et al., Ann Rheum Dis, 2007; 67:1218-21.
  2. Sieper, J. et al., Ann Rheum Dis, 2012; 71:700-6.


Disclosure: J. Sieper, AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer, and UCB., 9; A. A. Deodhar, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Merck-Sharp-Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB., 9; M. Hojnik, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; Y. Zhang, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; M. Dougados, AbbVie, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB., 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sieper J, Deodhar AA, Hojnik M, Zhang Y, Dougados M. Impact of Time Since Diagnosis, Age, and Number of Prior Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Response to Adalimumab (HUMIRA) in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-time-since-diagnosis-age-and-number-of-prior-non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory-drugs-on-response-to-adalimumab-humira-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-time-since-diagnosis-age-and-number-of-prior-non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory-drugs-on-response-to-adalimumab-humira-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology