ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1521

Impact of Time Since Diagnosis, Age, and Number of Prior Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on 52-Week Clinical Response to Adalimumab in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Joachim Sieper1, Atul A. Deodhar2, Maja Hojnik3, Ying Zhang4 and Maxime Dougados5, 1Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 3AbbVie, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 4AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 5René Descartes University and Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Adalimumab, Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Axial spondyloarthritis and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose : Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients (pts) were found to respond better to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) if treated early in the disease course.1 The actual disease onset and hence disease duration is not always known. Previously, younger age was found to have the largest positive impact on clinical outcomes following 12 weeks (wks) of adalimumab (ADA) treatment.2 The objective of this analysis was to examine the impact of time since diagnosis, age, and number of prior NSAIDs as surrogates for disease duration on clinical outcomes in AS pts from ATLAS trial treated with ADA for 52 wks.

 

Methods : ATLAS3,4 was a phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo(PBO)-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of originator ADA in pts with active AS who failed NSAID therapy. In this post hoc analysis, pts who received at least one dose of ADA during the PBO-controlled period or open label extension and received prior NSAID(s) at baseline (BL) were categorized by BL: (1) time since diagnosis (<2 vs ≥2; <5 vs ≥5; <10 vs ≥10 years [y]), (2) age (<35, 35–45, and >45 y), and (3) number of prior NSAIDs (≤ 2 vs >2). The effect of time since diagnosis, age, and number of prior NSAIDs on AS outcome measures following 52 wks of ADA treatment was examined.

 

Results : At wk 52, 274 pts had received at least one dose of ADA and had at least one prior NSAID at BL. A majority of pts were ≥5 y since AS diagnosis (188 [68.6%]), ≤45 y of age (163 [59.5%]), HLA-B27+ (213 [77.7%]), and had ≤2 prior NSAIDs (158 [57.7%]). Pts with shorter time since diagnosis were generally younger (late thirties). Across all subcategories, >70% of pts were male. The BL disease activity measures were numerically similar across most categories. Following 52 wks of ADA treatment, the proportions of pts achieving ASAS20 and ASAS40 responses were numerically higher and mean decreases in BASDAI and BASFI scores from BL larger in subcategories with shorter time since diagnosis, younger age, and fewer prior NSAIDs (Table). There were significant differences in ASAS40, BASDAI, and BASFI scores between time since diagnosis (<2 vs ≥2 and <5 vs ≥5 y) and age (<35 vs >45 y) subcategories.

Conclusion : Following 52 wks of ADA treatment, shorter time since diagnosis and younger age were associated with greater clinical responses and improvements in disease activity and functionality. Although younger age (<35 vs >45 y) had significant positive impact on the clinical outcomes similar to wk 12 results, shorter time since diagnosis (<2 vs ≥2 and <5 vs ≥5 y) was also associated with better 52-wk clinical outcomes. These results suggest that early effective treatment intervention may improve long-term clinical outcomes in AS pts.

References:

1.            Rudwaleit, M. et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2004; 63:665−70.

2.            Sieper, J. et al., Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10).

3.            Van der Heijde, D. et al., Ann Rheum Dis, 2007; 67:1218-21.

4.            Sieper, J. et al., Ann Rheum Dis, 2012; 71:700-6.



 


 


Disclosure: J. Sieper, AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sun Pharma, and UCB, 2,AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sun Pharma, and UCB, 5,AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sun Pharma, and UCB, 9; A. A. Deodhar, AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Merck-Sharp-Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB., 2,AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Merck-Sharp-Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharma, and UCB., 5; M. Hojnik, Abbvie, 1,abbvie, 3; Y. Zhang, AbbVie, 3,AbbVie, 1; M. Dougados, AbbVie, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB., 2,AbbVie, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB., 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sieper J, Deodhar AA, Hojnik M, Zhang Y, Dougados M. Impact of Time Since Diagnosis, Age, and Number of Prior Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on 52-Week Clinical Response to Adalimumab in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-time-since-diagnosis-age-and-number-of-prior-non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory-drugs-on-52-week-clinical-response-to-adalimumab-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-time-since-diagnosis-age-and-number-of-prior-non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory-drugs-on-52-week-clinical-response-to-adalimumab-in-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology