ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1583

Impact of Telehealth Implementation on Practice Patterns and Electronic Health Record Utilization During COVID19

Mithu Maheswaranathan1, Philip Chu1, Andrew Johannemann1, Megan Clowse2, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber3 and David Leverenz1, 1Duke University, Durham, NC, 2Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC, 3Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: COVID-19, Measurement, quality of care

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Measures & Measurement of Healthcare Quality Poster

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The COVID19 pandemic necessitated practice changes throughout health systems worldwide.  Our academic rheumatology practice rapidly adopted telehealth (telephone or video visits), with unknown consequences regarding providers’ time spent in the electronic health record (EHR) and ability to maintain patient care.  We therefore analyzed changes in EHR utilization with telehealth implementation within our practice during COVID19.

Methods: Data were obtained using Slicer Dicer and Signal, analytic data tools in our EHR to evaluate practice patterns.  We evaluated changes in the proportion of in-person versus telehealth visits, physician time spent per scheduled appointment in EHR activities (notes, orders, clinical review, and in-basket), and number of in-basket messages per day.  Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and national emergency declared on March 13, 2020, our practice (28 providers) began transitioning to telehealth on March 15.  During the Pre-Telehealth Period (Jan 5 – Mar 14), there was an average of 468 in-person visits/week and 0 telehealth visits.  During the Telehealth Implementation Period (Mar 15 – Apr 4), the proportion of total visits completed via Telehealth expanded rapidly: 52% in Week 1, 82% in Week 2, and 87% in Week 3 (Figure 1).  Post-Telehealth Implementation (Apr 4 – May 23), telehealth visits peaked at 92% (Apr 18) followed by a gradual decline to 63% (May 23).  The average number of total visits per week in the Post-Telehealth Implementation Period was 400, a 15% decline compared with the Pre-Telehealth Period.

During the Telehealth Implementation Period, we observed increased average EHR time per appointment in notes, in-basket and clinical review while time in orders remained stable (Figure 2).  The average number of in-basket messages/day for patient advice requests, prescription authorization requests, and overdue lab result messages all increased (Figure 3).  During the Post-Telehealth Implementation Period, patient advice and prescription authorization requests approached Pre-Telehealth levels, with a delayed increase in overdue lab result messages/day (Figure 3).

Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, our practice’s clinical volume only declined by 15% by rapidly shifting from all in-person visits to 87% of visits ( >300/week) by Telehealth over 3 weeks.  This transition required more time spent in multiple EHR activities and more in-basket requests (especially patient advice and prescription requests) during telehealth implementation.  We hypothesize that this reflects increased time spent coordinating care, answering patient questions about COVID19, and refilling hydroxychloroquine and other DMARDs in advance of potential shortages.  Subsequently, our overall EHR utilization returned near baseline, suggesting sustainability of this practice pattern.  During telehealth implementation, we observed a decrease in result messages per day, highlighting the difficulty of obtaining medication toxicity monitoring and other laboratory testing during telehealth.  We plan to continue monitoring this data with future shifts in practice.


Disclosure: M. Maheswaranathan, None; P. Chu, None; A. Johannemann, None; M. Clowse, UCB, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Astra Zeneca, 5, Pfizer, 2; L. Criscione-Schreiber, None; D. Leverenz, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maheswaranathan M, Chu P, Johannemann A, Clowse M, Criscione-Schreiber L, Leverenz D. Impact of Telehealth Implementation on Practice Patterns and Electronic Health Record Utilization During COVID19 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-telehealth-implementation-on-practice-patterns-and-electronic-health-record-utilization-during-covid19/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-telehealth-implementation-on-practice-patterns-and-electronic-health-record-utilization-during-covid19/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology