ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3136

Impact of Novel Smartphone Application on Pain and Mobility in Osteoarthritis Patients Treated with Hylan G-F 20

Nebojsa Skrepnik1, Andrew Spitzer2, Roy Altman3, John A. Hoekstra4, John Stewart5 and Richard Toselli6, 1Tucson Orthopaedic Institute, Tucson, AZ, 2Cedars-Sinai Orthopedic Center, Los Angeles, CA, 3UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 4National Clinical Research–Richmond, Richmond, VA, 5Sanofi, Laval, QC, Canada, 6Sanofi, Cambridge, MA

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Clinical research, Knee, mHealth and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspect II: Treatment and Imaging

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: OA is a leading cause of disability in the US. Although no disease-modifying therapies exist, patients with knee OA who walk 6,000 steps/day or more reduce the risk of developing a functional limitation within the next 2 years by half.1 The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the impact of a mobile application (OA GO) plus wearable activity monitor/pedometer in increasing the mobility of knee OA patients who were treated with hylan G-F 20.

Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label study in knee OA patients treated with a single 6-ml injection of hylan G-F 20 and randomized 1:1 to unblinded wearable activity monitor and OA GO (Group A; n=107) or blinded wearable activity monitor only (Group B; n=104). Participants were aged 30 to 80 years, were eligible to receive hylan G-F 20 per US labeling, and were familiar with smartphone technology. Outcome measures included mean number and percent change from baseline in steps/day, pain and distance of 6-minute walk test, patient/physician satisfaction surveys, Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), and adverse events (AEs) at 90 days. Descriptive statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics and least square means were used to compare changes from baseline.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In both groups, significant increases in mean number and percent change of steps/day from baseline were observed; a significantly greater improvement in both outcomes was observed for Group A versus Group B (1199 vs 467, P=.0345 for number of steps/day; 35.81 vs 11.48, P=0.0189 for percent change of steps/day). In the 6-minute walk test, there was a greater improvement from baseline for Group A versus Group B in reducing pain (−55.3% vs −33.8%, P=0.0068) and increasing distance (18.2% vs 6.3%, P=0.9583). There was a greater number of patients (65.4%)/physicians (67.3%) who would be likely/very likely to use/recommend the devices than those who would be unlikely to do so. In both groups, PAM-13 scores improved from baseline however, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups (5.0% vs 6.9%, P=0.9931). The AE profiles were similar for the two arms.

Conclusion: In this study, both groups were treated with hylan G-F 20 and showed significantly increased mobility and reduced pain, however, patients using the wearable activity monitor and OA GO mobile application had significantly improved mobility over controls without adding safety concerns. Overall, patient use of a novel smartphone application in conjunction with a wearable activity monitor enhanced the efficacy imparted by hylan G-F 20 treatment for knee OA in steps per day and pain with walking in the 6-minute walk test. Sanofi provided funding for the study.   1White DK, Tudor-Locke C, Zhang Y, Fielding R, LaValley M, Felson DT, et al. Daily walking and the risk of incident functional limitation in knee OA: An observational study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66:1328-36.


Disclosure: N. Skrepnik, Biomimetic, 2,Genzyme Corporation, 2,Johnson & Johnson, 2,Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2,Orthofix, Inc., 5,Q-med, 5,Regeneration Technologies, Inc, 2,SamuMed, 5,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 2,Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2,Stryker, 2,Wright Medical Technology, Inc, 2; A. Spitzer, DePuy, A Johnson Johnson Company, 5,Flexion Therapeutics, 5,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 5,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 8; R. Altman, Ferring Pharmaceutical, 5,Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 5,Pfizer Inc, 5; J. A. Hoekstra, Amgen Co., 8; J. Stewart, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 1,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 3; R. Toselli, Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 1,Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Skrepnik N, Spitzer A, Altman R, Hoekstra JA, Stewart J, Toselli R. Impact of Novel Smartphone Application on Pain and Mobility in Osteoarthritis Patients Treated with Hylan G-F 20 [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-novel-smartphone-application-on-pain-and-mobility-in-osteoarthritis-patients-treated-with-hylan-g-f-20/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-novel-smartphone-application-on-pain-and-mobility-in-osteoarthritis-patients-treated-with-hylan-g-f-20/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology