ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0925

Impact of Initiating Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs on Pain Medication Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Mengdong He1, Yvonne Lee2, Yinzhu Jin3, Rishi Desai3, Seanna Vine3 and Seoyoung Kim3, 1UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 2Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Administrative Data, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), pain, Pharmacoepidemiology, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Chronic pain associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) leads to impaired patient function and quality of life. Prior studies suggest initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is associated with RA pain relief. However, real-world evidence on the impact of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs) on pain treatments is limited. This study aims to assess pain medication use before vs. after bDMARD or tsDMARD initiation in RA patients in a real-world setting.

Methods: Using Optum Clinformatics data (2009-20), we conducted a cohort study with 4 groups of adult RA patients who were first- or second-line initiators of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. Patients were required to have ≥one-year continuous insurance enrollment before and after cohort entry (i.e., bDMARD or tsDMARD initiation date), without pregnancy, cancer, kidney transplant, or dialysis at baseline (i.e., one year before cohort entry), and without initiating >1 bDMARD or tsDMARD at cohort entry. Our study outcomes include use of 5 medication classes for pain management (NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, opioids, oral corticosteroids, gabapentinoids, and muscle relaxants), use of 6 subclasses of opioids, and daily prednisone and morphine equivalent dose among oral corticosteroid and opioid users. Using intention-to-treat analysis, study participants were followed one year from one day after cohort entry.

Results: The study cohort included 16,403 bDMARD first-line initiators, 15,458 bDMARD second-line initiators, 893 tsDMARD first-line initiators, and 2,455 tsDMARD second-line initiators. Their mean (standard deviation) age ranged between 54.28 (12.65) and 60.22 (12.70) years. 76.00-82.89% were female. Patients in all 4 groups had high prevalence of osteoarthritis, corticosteroid joint injections, and high-dose and long-term opioid use at baseline (Table 1). Before initiating bDMARDs or tsDMARDs, the prevalence of pain medication use in first-line initiators was 46.19-48.80% for NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, 70.13-72.48% for oral corticosteroids, 54.87-60.91% for opioids, 18.17-21.61% for gabapentinoids, and 21.78-24.91% for muscle relaxants. Within one year after initiation, the prevalence decreased by 7.95-9.35% for NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, 8.51-9.56% for oral corticosteroids, 2.91-4.22% for opioids, and 0.52-1.46% for muscle relaxants, but increased by 1.23-1.41% for gabapentinoids (Figure). Reduced opioid use was mainly driven by the decline in hydrocodone and tramadol use. Mean daily prednisone equivalent dose among oral corticosteroid users decreased from 2.60-2.63mg to 2.10-2.21mg while mean daily morphine equivalent dose among opioid users increased from 11.09-11.66mg to 11.69-11.95mg (Table 2). Changes were smaller though similar in second-line users.

Conclusion: Initiation of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs in RA patients is associated with decreased use of NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, oral corticosteroids, opioids, and muscle relaxants, but increased use of gabapentinoids within one year post the drug initiation. Among oral corticosteroid and opioid users, bDMARD or tsDMARD initiation had very small but opposite impact on dose changes. The observed utilization patterns warrant further studies.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: M. He, None; Y. Lee, Pfizer, Cigna-Express Scripts, Eli Lilly, Sanofi-Genzyme; Y. Jin, None; R. Desai, Bayer, Vertex, Novartis; S. Vine, None; S. Kim, Pfizer, AbbVie/Abbott, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS).

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

He M, Lee Y, Jin Y, Desai R, Vine S, Kim S. Impact of Initiating Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs on Pain Medication Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-initiating-biologic-and-targeted-synthetic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-on-pain-medication-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-initiating-biologic-and-targeted-synthetic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-on-pain-medication-use-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology