ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2203

Impact of Hypothetical Changes in the Use of Analgesics on the Burden of Osteoarthritis: A Population-based Microsimulation Study

Jacek Kopec1, Eric Sayre 2, Anya Okhmatovskaia 3, Jolanda Cibere 4, Linda Li 5, Nick Bansback 6, Hubert Wong 5 and John Esdaile 7, 1Arthritis Research Canada and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Arthritis Research Canada and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 5University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 7Arthritis Research Canada and the University of British Columbia, Richmond, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: medication, microsimulation and quality-adjusted life years, Osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Analgesics are the cornerstone of medical treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) but are associated with serious side effects. A more optimal use of analgesics in OA is one strategy to reduce the population health burden of OA. The purpose of this simulation study was to assess the impact of hypothetical changes in the use of analgesics on the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) among persons with OA in the general population.

Methods: We used a previously validated population-based microsimulation model of OA in Canada, POHEM-OA. Model parameters were derived from a large administrative database in British Columbia, Canadian national surveys, and the scientific literature. The model included data on OA incidence, frequency of use of 4 classes of medication (acetaminophen, traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], COX-2 inhibitors [coxibs], and opioids), treatment benefits in terms of pain reduction, frequency and quality-of-life (QOL) impact of adverse effects associated with each medication type (dyspepsia, ulcer, cardiovascular disease [CVD], stroke, and “other”) and overall QOL measured by the Health Utilities Index 3. We assessed the impact of changes in medication use on overall QALYs. In the base-case scenario we assumed that the relative risk of adverse effects due to medication is doubled among persons aged 70+ compared to those < 70 years of age. Alternative assumptions were tested in sensitivity analyses. The scenarios involved increases and decreases in the use of all medications and each medication type individually.

Results: Under the base-case scenario, an average person with OA accumulated about 13.3 QALYs from OA diagnosis till death. Increasing the odds of using analgesics by 50%, 100% and 200% resulted in incrementally greater improvements in overall QALYs. However, the improvements were small (0.05-0.15 QALYs) and were observed only for opioids and acetaminophen. Increasing NSAIDs had virtually no effect on overall QALYs. Targeting persons with moderate or severe pain ( >2 or >3 on a 5-point scale) for aggressive treatment (increasing the odds of treatment 3-fold) achieved a greater overall benefit than targeting all OA patients. Reducing the odds of using all analgesics by 50% among older (70+) patients with OA did not affect QALYs, whereas eliminating NSAIDs in this group had a slight beneficial effect at the population level. These results were sensitive to the assumptions about the relative risk of adverse effects among the elderly.

Conclusion: We found a beneficial but relatively small impact on QALYs of more aggressive treatment of OA with acetaminophen and opioids, and no benefit from increasing NSAIDs. For coxibs, even though gastrointestinal complications were reduced compared to traditional NSAIDs, the benefits of pain reduction were virtually nullified by the increased risk of CVD and stroke. Overall, the results seem plausible and support the validity of the simulation model. A limitation of the current model is that it does not consider the long-term harmful effects of opioids, including addiction and overdose.


Disclosure: J. Kopec, None; E. Sayre, None; A. Okhmatovskaia, None; J. Cibere, None; L. Li, None; N. Bansback, None; H. Wong, None; J. Esdaile, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kopec J, Sayre E, Okhmatovskaia A, Cibere J, Li L, Bansback N, Wong H, Esdaile J. Impact of Hypothetical Changes in the Use of Analgesics on the Burden of Osteoarthritis: A Population-based Microsimulation Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-hypothetical-changes-in-the-use-of-analgesics-on-the-burden-of-osteoarthritis-a-population-based-microsimulation-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-hypothetical-changes-in-the-use-of-analgesics-on-the-burden-of-osteoarthritis-a-population-based-microsimulation-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology